当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 农业技术论文 >

淤地坝系对流域水沙动力过程调控作用与模拟研究

发布时间:2018-03-07 05:12

  本文选题:淤地坝系 切入点:MIKE模型 出处:《西安理工大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:淤地坝系在黄土高原水土保持生态建设中发挥着重要作用,科学认识淤地坝系对流域水沙过程的影响,对保障淤地坝系安全运行、维护黄土高原生态安全具有重要意义。本研究以陕西省绥德县王茂沟流域为研究对象,采用统计分析、原型观测及数值模拟等手段,研究了坝地土壤水分分布规律,分析了淤地坝系对沟道侵蚀动力过程的调控作用,阐明了淤地坝系调蓄径流、拦泥减沙的作用机理。取得的主要结论如下:(1)坝地的分层淤积结构具有明显的阻水作用,使土壤水分呈层状分布。坝地表层(0-20 cm) 土壤水分空间分布均属于中等变异,0-240 cm 土层土壤平均含水量变化范围为9.92%-23.70%,随深度的增加,土壤平均含水量表现为先减小后增大;坝地土壤水分在空间上具有明显的分层现象,且坝前各层土壤含水量均明显高于坝中和坝尾,在时间上属于中等变异;MIKE SHE模型很好地模拟了坝地土壤水分的层状分布,在坝地分层土壤结构中,质地较细的泥沙层持水能力强于质地较粗的泥沙层,细颗粒泥沙含水量明显高于粗颗粒泥沙。(2)基于MIKE SHE和MIKE 11耦合建立的流域水文模型可以较好地模拟黄土高原小流域次暴雨洪水过程。模拟结果表明,淤地坝系建设使洪峰减小65.34%,洪量减少58.67%,洪水过程坦化;骨干坝、中型坝和小型坝的建设分别使洪峰减小27.28%、33.39%、40.13%,洪量减少2.18%、27.08%、44.89%;串联、并联、混联三种坝系级联方式分别使洪峰减小64.30%、75.38%、83.31%,洪量减少37.52%、50.88%、52.68%;淤地坝建设改变了洪水历时,骨干坝和中型坝的建设增加洪水历时,而小型坝缩短洪水历时。并联坝系不会改变洪峰出现时间,串联和混联坝系使洪峰滞后10min出现,串联坝系减小了洪水历时,并联和混联坝系增加了洪水历时。(3)淤地坝系明显改变了坝前坝后的水动力过程,降低了沟道径流侵蚀动力。骨干坝、中型坝、小型坝的修建使坝前的流速、径流剪切力、径流功率、单位水流功率等水动力参数急剧减小;不同坝型对坝后水动力过程影响不同,其中骨干坝后各水动力参数减幅相对较小。坝系建设改变了沟道侵蚀动力的空间分布,未建坝时,流域出口的侵蚀动力最大,坝系建成后,流域出口的侵蚀动力最小,其余坝系布局介于这两种工况之间。不同坝系级联方式对流域侵蚀动力的调控作用也不同,串联、并联、混联坝系使流域出口最大流速分别减小57.83%、69.40%、78.35%,最大径流剪切力分别减小82.23%、90.64%、95.32%,最大径流功率分别减小92.50%、97.14%、98.99%,其中混联坝系的减幅最大。(4)坝系建设明显减小了流域的径流侵蚀功率,减少了流域的输沙量。沟道未建坝时,流域多条支沟的径流侵蚀功率大于主沟,主沟沿程径流侵蚀功率大致介于2×10-4m4/(s.km2)~5×10-4m4/(s.km2)之间;坝系建成后,流域的径流侵蚀功率明显减小,径流侵蚀功率从主沟上游到下游表现为先减小后增大的趋势。与流域不建坝相比,建设骨干坝、中型坝、小型坝分别使输沙模数减少24.74%、47.11%和64.11%,其中小型坝减幅最大,坝系全部建成后流域输沙模数减少比例最大,达83.92%。
[Abstract]:Warping dam system plays an important role in the ecological construction of soil and water conservation in the Loess Plateau, the scientific understanding of the impact of runoff and sediment process of warping dam system, to ensure the safe operation of warping dam system, plays an important role in maintaining ecological security of the Loess Plateau. Based on the case study of Suide County of Shaanxi Province Wang Mao Gou basin as the research object, by using statistical analysis, prototype observation and numerical simulation, study the distribution of soil water dam, analyzed control effect of Warping Dam System on gully erosion dynamic process, the warping dam system of runoff regulation, mechanism of sediment and sediment. The main results are as follows: (1) stratified structure with water silt dam resistance obviously, the soil moisture distribution is layered. The dam surface (0-20 cm) spatial distribution of soil moisture variations are moderate, 0-240 cm soil water content is 9.92%-23.70%, with the The increase of depth, the average soil water content showed decreased first and then increased; the soil moisture had obvious stratification in space, and each layer of soil moisture before the dam dam and dam were significantly higher than the tail, a moderate variation in time; MIKE SHE model is better to simulate the layered distribution of dam soil moisture in the dam, layered soil structure, fine texture of the mud sand strong water holding capacity in sediment layer of coarse texture, fine sediment water content was significantly higher than that of coarse sediment. (2) the establishment of MIKE SHE and MIKE 11 watershed hydrological model based on coupling can be used to simulate the process of small watershed in the Loess Plateau rainstorm flood. The simulation results show that the warping dam system construction so that the peak is reduced by 65.34%, 58.67% reduction in volume, flood Tanzania; Key Dam, dam construction of medium and small dam respectively. The peak is reduced by 27.28%, 33.39%, 40.13%, 2.1 reduction in volume 8%, 27.08%, 44.89%; series, parallel, hybrid three cascade dam system respectively. The peak is reduced by 64.30%, 75.38%, 83.31%, 50.88%, volume decreased by 37.52%, 52.68%; the dam construction changed the flood duration, the construction of key dams and medium-sized dams increase flood duration, and shorten the duration of flood. The dam type small shunt the dam system will not change the flood peak time series, and hybrid dam system make the peak lag 10min series, the dam system reduces the flood duration, parallel connection of dam system increases the duration of flood. (3) warping dam system significantly changed before the dam dam after water dynamic process, reducing the channel runoff erosion power. Key Dam, medium small dam, dam construction of the dam before the runoff shear stress, flow rate, runoff power, unit flow power and other hydrodynamic parameters decrease rapidly; different dam type has different effects on the dynamic process of water dam, the dam after the bone dry hydrodynamic parameters relative reduction Small. Dam construction changed gully erosion dynamic spatial distribution, no dam, basin outlet erosion dynamic maximum dam system after the completion of the watershed outlet erosion power minimum, the other dam system layout between these two conditions. The effects of different methods on the cascade dam system of erosion power is also different. Series, parallel, hybrid dam system make the basin outlet maximum velocity is decreased by 57.83%, 69.40%, 78.35%, the maximum runoff shear stress was reduced by 82.23%, 90.64%, 95.32%, the maximum runoff power is decreased by 92.50%, 97.14%, 98.99%, the hybrid dam is the largest reduction. (4) construction of dam system significantly reduces the power erosion basin runoff, reduce the amount of sediment in the river channel. Without dam, runoff many branch ditch erosion power is greater than the main channel, the main Gouyan process of runoff erosion power roughly between 2 * 10-4m4/ (s.km2) ~ 5 * 10-4m4/ (s.km2) between the dam system; After the completion of the watershed runoff erosion power decreases, runoff erosion power from the main channel upstream to downstream is decreased first and then increased. Compared with the river basin dam, the construction of Key Dam, medium small dam dam, respectively. The sediment modulus decreased by 24.74%, 47.11% and 64.11%, of which a small dam the largest reduction, dam system after the completion of the whole sediment modulus decrease the largest proportion, up to 83.92%.

【学位授予单位】:西安理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S157.31

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 高海东;贾莲莲;李占斌;徐国策;赵宾华;;基于图论的淤地坝对径流影响的机制[J];中国水土保持科学;2015年04期

2 孙佳美;李瀚之;赵阳;余新晓;常玉;;构树林下枯落物对坡面流水动力学特性的影响[J];水土保持学报;2015年03期

3 晏清洪;原翠萍;雷廷武;雷启祥;张满良;苏广旭;;降水和水土保持对黄土区流域水沙关系的影响[J];中国水土保持科学;2013年04期

4 夏卫兵;;土壤侵蚀降雨物理学简论[J];中国水土保持科学;2013年02期

5 张永东;吴淑芳;冯浩;原立峰;;土壤侵蚀过程中坡面流水力学特性及侵蚀动力研究评述[J];土壤;2013年01期

6 刘仁杰;朱红春;汤国安;谢轶群;曾瑞安;;基于DEM的黄土坡面流水侵蚀潜能因子初步研究[J];水土保持通报;2012年05期

7 赵海镜;胡春宏;陈绪坚;;黄河干流河道输水量与输沙量关系研究[J];水利学报;2012年04期

8 谭贞学;王占礼;刘俊娥;袁殷;陈浩;王莎;申楠;焦念;;黄土坡面细沟径流输沙对水动力学参数的响应[J];中国水土保持科学;2011年05期

9 李君兰;蔡强国;孙莉英;郑明国;;坡面水流速度与坡面含砂量的关系[J];农业工程学报;2011年03期

10 徐宗学;程磊;;分布式水文模型研究与应用进展[J];水利学报;2010年09期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 杨启红;黄土高原典型流域土地利用与沟道工程的径流泥沙调控作用研究[D];北京林业大学;2009年

2 徐向舟;黄土高原沟道坝系拦沙效应模型试验研究[D];清华大学;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 郑良勇;黄土地区陡坡水蚀动力过程试验研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2003年



本文编号:1578064

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/1578064.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5e3df***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com