实质等同原则缺陷与转基因作物评价原则体系构建

发布时间：2018-05-20 14:19

  本文选题：转基因作物 + 实质等同　； 参考：《自然辩证法研究》2017年08期

【摘要】：随美国转基因标识法案通过,实质等同作为转基因作物评价准则已被基本否定。该原则存在实验不足、忽视过程、线性逻辑、缺乏历时等方面的科学方法缺陷。同时,它还蕴涵技术红利价值偏好的非科学缺陷。这会造成人体健康生态环境与市场接受度等安全层面,或基于科学假设、或基于利益推测的不确定性结果。基于此,应从科学风险举证性、评价操作合理性及利害取舍正当性层面来建构转基因作物评价原则体系。
[Abstract]:With the passage of the US GMO labeling Act, substantive equivalence has been basically denied as a criterion for GM crop evaluation. There are some defects in this principle, such as lack of experiment, neglect of process, linear logic and lack of diachronic scientific methods. At the same time, it also contains the unscientific defect of the value preference of technical dividend. This will result in the safety aspects of human health, ecological environment and market acceptance, either based on scientific assumptions or uncertainty based on profit speculation. Therefore, the evaluation principle system of transgenic crops should be constructed from the aspects of scientific risk proof, the rationality of evaluation operation and the legitimacy of selection of interests.
【作者单位】： 北京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院;
【基金】：北京市软科学项目(Z151100002615031)
【分类号】：S188
，

本文编号：1914953