西藏地区典型小流域坡面尺度水土保持生态效应评价研究
本文选题:水土保持 + 生态效应 ; 参考:《中国水利水电科学研究院》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:水土流失是制约人类发展和社会进步的重大问题,会对生态环境可持续发展造成严重威胁,是导致生态环境恶化和地区贫困的重要原因。水土流失的危害方式主要包括破坏土壤结构、降低土壤肥力、造成土地沙漠化及石漠化、引发自然灾害等。近年来,由于全球气候变化和人类自然活动的影响,西藏地区生态系统稳定性降低、水土流失问题不断加剧。目前,由于西藏地区水土保持监测站点和监测资料的匮乏,导致有关该区域的水土保持生态效应研究极少。本文以水利部公益性行业科研专项"青藏高原区水土保持生态效应监测与评价技术"为依托,以西藏地区日喀则市的日朗河小流域和拉萨市的茶巴朗小流域为研究区域,对其坡面尺度水土保持生态效应进行全面、科学的评价,构建适用于西藏地区坡面尺度的水土保持生态效应评价指标体系,开展水土保持生态效应的量化评价,为该地区的水土保持生态建设提供规划依据和技术支撑。其主要研究内容及结论如下:(1)首先,通过对研究区水土流失特点和水土保持现状的分析,结合频数统计分析法及专家经验法,初步遴选出14个生态效应评价指标。其次,采用主成分分析法,剔除综合贡献率较低的全磷及土壤有效厚度指标;根据相关性分析结果,剔除与土壤储水量重复性较高的土壤含水率指标;结合指标变异系数和响应程度的计算值,剔除弱敏感性的土壤PH指标。最终,构建了包含土壤储水量、土壤侵蚀模数、最大持水量、土壤容重、有机质、全氮、全钾、植被盖度、生物多样性及土壤固碳量等10个指标的评价体系。(2)针对生态效应评价的特点,采用层次分析法及熵权法计算各个指标的组合权重,其结果为:土壤储水量0.109、土壤侵蚀模数0.251、最大持水量0.059、土壤容重0.021、有机质0.105、全氮0.113、全钾0.024、植被盖度0.113、生物多样性0.041、土壤固碳量0.164。(3)结合各个评价指标的权重和监测资料,计算不同水土保持措施下生态效应的综合评价值。结果表明,水土保持措施区生态效应优于无措施区,说明水土保持措施有助于水土流失治理;针对不同土地利用类型,林地、耕地及石坎梯田的生态效应均优于无措施区,其中,林地生态效应最好,耕地及石坎梯田由于人为扰动多、措施实施时间短等原因,均劣于林地;针对不同水土保持措施,除江孜县卡尔村及曲水县草方格措施外,水土保持措施区生态效应均优于无措施区,这与措施实施时间及研究区气候、土壤条件有关。(4)采用单因素方差分析法对研究区各个单项指标进行对比分析发现,总体而言,除江孜县卡尔村外,随着水土保持措施的实施,措施区各项指标较无措施区域均有所改善。卡尔村出现的异常情况与该区措施实施时间短、人口少、人为扰动少、土壤结皮较厚有关。另外,针对挪村土壤容重及曲水县杨树林土壤侵蚀模数出现异常的原因,还需对研究区进行长期动态监测,进一步研究探讨。
[Abstract]:Soil erosion is a major problem that restricts the development of human and social progress. It will cause serious threat to the sustainable development of the ecological environment. It is an important cause for the deterioration of the ecological environment and the poverty in the region. The damage ways of soil erosion mainly include destroying soil structure, reducing soil fertility, causing land desertification and rocky desertification, and causing nature. In recent years, due to the influence of global climate change and human natural activities, the stability of the ecosystem in Tibet has been reduced and the problem of soil erosion has been aggravated. At present, the lack of monitoring sites and monitoring data on Soil and water conservation in Tibet region has resulted in few studies on the ecological effects of soil and water conservation in this region. Based on the technology of monitoring and evaluating the ecological effects of soil and water conservation in the Qinghai Tibet plateau area, the public welfare industry research project is based on the technology of monitoring and evaluating the ecological effects of soil and water conservation in the Qinghai Tibet plateau area, taking the small catchment of Shigatse in Tibet and the small catchment of tea Barang in Lhasa as the research area. The ecological effects of soil and water conservation on the slope scale are fully and scientifically evaluated, and the construction of the slope is suitable for the slope of the Tibet area. The evaluation index system of soil and water conservation ecological effect of surface scale and the quantitative evaluation of ecological effect of soil and water conservation provide the planning basis and technical support for the ecological construction of soil and water conservation in this area. The main contents and conclusions are as follows: (1) first, through the analysis of the characteristics of water and soil loss and the current situation of soil and water conservation in the study area, the combination frequency 14 ecological effects evaluation indexes were selected by statistical analysis method and expert experience method. Secondly, the principal component analysis method was used to eliminate total phosphorus and soil effective thickness index with low comprehensive contribution rate, and the soil water content index, which was higher in soil water storage, was eliminated according to the correlation analysis results, and the index variation coefficient and the index variation coefficient were eliminated. In the end, the evaluation system of 10 indexes, including soil water storage, soil erosion modulus, maximum water retention, soil bulk density, organic matter, total nitrogen, total nitrogen, total potassium, vegetation coverage, biodiversity and soil carbon sequestration, was constructed. (2) according to the characteristics of ecological effect evaluation, the hierarchical classification was adopted. The method of analysis and entropy weight method is used to calculate the combination weight of each index. The results are as follows: soil water storage 0.109, soil erosion modulus 0.251, maximum water holding capacity 0.059, soil bulk weight 0.021, organic matter 0.105, total nitrogen 0.113, total potassium 0.024, vegetation coverage 0.113, biological diversity 0.041, soil carbon sequestration 0.164. (3) combined with the weight of each evaluation index and monitoring data The comprehensive evaluation of ecological effects under different soil and water conservation measures was calculated. The results showed that the ecological effect of soil and water conservation measures was better than that in the non measure zone, indicating that soil and water conservation measures were helpful for soil erosion control, and the ecological effects of soil conservation measures were better than those in the non measure areas, and the ecological effects of forest land, arable land and sill terrace were all better than those in the non measures area. The effect of soil and water conservation measures is better than that of woodland. In addition to the measures of soil and water conservation, the ecological effects of soil and water conservation measures are superior to those in the non measure areas, in addition to the measures of soil and water conservation in Carle village and Qu Shui county of Jiangzi County, the ecological effects of soil and water conservation measures are all better than those in the non measures areas. (4) the comparison and analysis of the individual indexes of the study area by the single factor ANOVA found that, in general, except the Carle village in Jiangzi County, with the implementation of the measures of soil and water conservation, the indexes of the measure areas were improved more than those in the non measures. The abnormal situation in the village of Carle and the time of the implementation of the measures in this area were short, the population was small, and the human beings were disturbed. In addition, the long-term dynamic monitoring of the soil erosion modulus of the poplar forest in the village of the village and the soil bulk weight of the village and the soil erosion modulus of the poplar forest in the county of Qu Shui county are also needed to be further studied and discussed.
【学位授予单位】:中国水利水电科学研究院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S157
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;水利部发布《水土保持生态环境监测网络管理办法》[J];中国水土保持;2000年05期
2 ;重庆市着手建设水土保持生态园区[J];中国水土保持;2000年11期
3 ;第二届水土保持生态环境研讨会暨第六届海峡两岸水土保持学术研讨会在京召开[J];北京水利;2001年06期
4 李永贵;建设北京山区水土保持生态村[J];北京水利;2002年05期
5 ;关于征集“全国水土保持生态修复研讨会”论文的通知[J];中国水土保持;2004年01期
6 洪双旌;水土保持生态的修复需要人工的合理干预[J];水土保持研究;2004年03期
7 ;水土保持生态修复[J];中国水利;2004年24期
8 郭凤红,张洪军,于洪军,侯占红;水土保持生态修复实践观念构建的探讨[J];现代农业;2005年07期
9 周秀国,王秀梅;山东省水土保持生态修复的实践及对策[J];山东林业科技;2005年05期
10 周秀国;杨永峰;;山东省水土保持生态修复的实践及对策[J];山东水利;2006年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 叶碎高;叶永棋;崔丹;;浙江省水土保持生态修复的探索与实践[A];全国水土保持生态修复学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
2 贾泽祥;;对新世纪水土保持生态建设指导思想的探讨[A];新世纪 新机遇 新挑战——知识创新和高新技术产业发展(下册)[C];2001年
3 方天纵;;水土保持生态修复理论依据初步分析[A];全国水土保持生态修复研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
4 杨爱民;刘孝盈;李跃辉;;水土保持生态修复的概念、分类与技术方法[A];全国水土保持生态修复研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
5 李敏;;黄河水土保持生态修复的理论与实践[A];第二届全国水土保持生态修复学术研讨会论文集[C];2010年
6 罗拥军;;荆门市水土保持生态补偿机制研究[A];河湖水生态水环境专题论坛论文集[C];2011年
7 ;水土保持生态管理体系的构建[A];2010煤炭企业管理现代化创新成果集(上)[C];2011年
8 卿太明;;实施水土保持生态自然修复工程应注意解决的几个问题[A];水土保持监督管理论文选编[C];2003年
9 胡建民;左长清;谢颂华;;水土保持生态修复效益监测探讨[A];全国水土保持生态修复研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
10 姚孝友;肖幼;;水土保持生态修复与生态重建[A];全国水土保持生态修复研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 马晓媛 通讯员 土小宁;北京延庆县通过“国家水土保持生态文明县”专家评审[N];中国水利报;2012年
2 记者 黄俊 通讯员 陈天长 卢晓香;长汀县通过全国水土保持生态文明县省级初评[N];闽西日报;2013年
3 ;2012年度国家水土保持生态文明工程名单[N];中国水利报;2013年
4 记者 黄俊 通讯员 陈天长 卢晓香;长汀加快创建国家水土保持生态文明县[N];闽西日报;2013年
5 记者 林阿玲 陈天长;长汀成为我省首个“国家水土保持生态文明县”[N];闽西日报;2013年
6 记者 胡争上;福建德化长汀两县获评“国家水土保持生态文明县”[N];中国水利报;2013年
7 记者 李玉林 通讯员 何英 朱德军;夷陵争创全国水土保持生态文明县[N];三峡日报;2014年
8 记者 倪金凤;宁东基地水土保持生态环境动态监测阶段成果通过审查[N];华兴时报;2008年
9 闫丽娟;天时、地利、人和促进水土保持生态修复[N];中国水利报;2004年
10 通讯员 马丽媛;龙门山水土保持生态示范园揭牌[N];济宁日报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 吴岚;水土保持生态服务功能及其价值研究[D];北京林业大学;2007年
2 杨永峰;基于多重分析的山东省水土保持生态功能区划研究[D];北京林业大学;2009年
3 杜丽娟;水土保持补偿机制研究[D];北京林业大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王洁敏;汉江源头水土保持生态补偿问题研究[D];西北大学;2015年
2 聂斌斌;水土保持生态修复区域差异研究[D];华中农业大学;2010年
3 苑涛;水土保持生态补偿机制研究[D];西南大学;2012年
4 常芳;水土保持生态补偿法律机制研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2011年
5 朱丹;国家水土保持生态修复云南大姚试点工程效益监测研究[D];昆明理工大学;2005年
6 邢先双;山东省水土保持生态修复工程效益监测与评价[D];山东农业大学;2006年
7 李中原;基于3S技术的水土保持生态工程可行性研究[D];大连理工大学;2003年
8 杨子峰;平邑县水土保持生态修复工程生态效益监测与评价[D];华中农业大学;2007年
9 徐海波;基于3S技术的北京市水土保持生态环境管理信息系统[D];清华大学;2003年
10 高智;浙江省临安市水土保持生态修复的实践[D];西北农林科技大学;2014年
,本文编号:2040732
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2040732.html