沙质土壤改良剂对沙地改良效果的研究
[Abstract]:Horqin sandy land is one of the four largest sandy land in China. It is one of the most serious desertification areas in the agro pastoral ecotone of China. The land degradation is serious. The wind sandy soil is the main soil type in this area. The soil structure is poor, the leakage of water is serious and the land productivity is low, which seriously restricts the agricultural development in this area. The spatial and temporal changes of soil physical, biological and chemical properties in five years after the soil amelioration, the effect of sandy soil remodifier on the water conservation and the long-term mechanism of sandy land and its long-term mechanism, which provide theoretical basis and technical support for sandy land control in this area and sandy land to good farmland. Research results showed that (1) sandy soil improver improved soil substance. Rational form increased the water retention capacity of the soil, and increased with the increasing age of the modifier. After applying the sandy soil improver, the soil aggregate content of 0.25mm was increased, the increase in the 0-10cm soil layer was the largest, and the 37.16%-131.98% was increased in comparison with the control; the bulk density was reduced, the 0-1Ocm soil layer was the largest, and the 0.6%-8.4% was lower than the control, and 0-40cm was improved. Soil water conservation, in particular, significantly increased the water content of 20-40cm soil, increased 21.2%-39.19% compared with the control, and increased the soil water storage in 0-40cm soil layer, increased 25.28%-48.39% compared with the control, and the whole growth period was more 10.22mm. (2) than the control. The soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus content and enzyme activity were increased in the 0-40cm soil layer, and the content reached the maximum in the bell mouth stage, the content of 10-20cm reached the maximum in the soil layer and the greatest influence on the layer. The microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus increased 0.62%-32.54%, 5.97%-43.61%, 8.28%-56.23%, soil urease and sucrose. Enzyme and catalase increased 2.6%-12.37%, 2.82%-14.62%, 28.22%-46.65%. (3) sandy soil modifier, which improved soil chemical properties, increased soil fertility, and increased with the increase of fertilization years. The nutrient content in the control soil increased with the depth of soil layer, and reached the maximum in the 20-40cm soil layer. The treatment with the modifier reached the maximum in the 10-20cm soil layer. In the 0-40cm soil layer, soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium and available nitrogen, available phosphorus, and quick available potassium, respectively, increased 0.41%-14.11%, 0.57%-13.74%, 1.23%-36.27%, 2.23%-38.61%, 0.14%-42.2%, 0.75% -19.72%, 1.62%-20.51%, and all the treatment of alkaline solution by using the modifier during the whole growth period. The reserves of available phosphorus and potassium were increased by 4.26-13.34 kg/hm2,0.52-0.87 kg/hm2,6.37-17.05 kg/hm2. (4) and the effect of increasing production and harvest was increased by the application of sandy soil modifier, while the water output rate and water use efficiency were increased. Compared with the control, 3.46%-6.91% and 7.10%-11.41% were improved; the corn grain yield of 2013 and 2014 was increased by 15.10%-59.62% and 22.75%-41.42% compared with the control. The application of sandy soil reformer could recover the cost at fourth years, the net income reached 3603.49 yuan /hm2 in fourth years, and the net income reached 8827.16 yuan in fifth years. / hm2. It can be seen that the application of sandy soil amendment has obvious improvement effect and long-term effect on sandy land, which is an effective way to increase the soil income in sandy land.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S156.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邵玉翠,张余良,李悦,严晔端,安玉钗;天然矿物改良剂在微咸水灌溉土壤中应用效果的研究[J];水土保持学报;2005年04期
2 伊力哈木;郭华;曹金芬;;土壤盐碱改良剂效果对比试验[J];新疆农业科技;2007年05期
3 王意锟;郝秀珍;周东美;方升佐;朱强根;张焕朝;;改良剂施用对重金属污染土壤溶液化学性质及豇豆生理特性的影响研究[J];土壤;2011年01期
4 卢槰林;;土W探峁垢牧技羀J];科学大众;1962年10期
5 杨卫东;吴永健;刘春光;;盐碱土改良剂的研究和应用进展[J];天津科技;2014年02期
6 顾国平;章明奎;;重金属污染农地土壤治理的改良剂选择[J];现代农业科技;2008年17期
7 郭和蓉,陈琼贤,彭志平,林翠兰;荔枝施用营养型酸性土壤改良剂的增产改土效果[J];长江大学学报(自科版);2005年08期
8 ;盐碱改良剂施地佳的试验效果[J];农村科技;2007年12期
9 邵玉翠;任顺荣;张玉连;廉晓娟;李玉鹏;;潮土施用改良剂与长期灌溉微咸水模拟试验研究[J];土壤通报;2009年04期
10 曹直昌;盐碱土的改良剂──磷石膏[J];新疆农垦科技;1997年05期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 王清博;窦森;冯程程;许敬海;;生物改良剂对参后地修复作用的研究[A];土壤资源持续利用和生态环境安全——中国土壤学会第十一届二次理事扩大会议暨学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 邢世和;熊德中;许茜;;不同改良剂对烟区土壤改土效果及烤烟产量和质量的影响[A];第八届全国青年土壤暨第三届全国青年植物营养与肥料科学工作者学术讨论会论文集[C];2002年
3 雷鸣;唐贞;杨仁斌;宋正国;唐世荣;;改良剂修复Cd污染稻田的研究[A];农业环境与生态安全——第五届全国农业环境科学学术研讨会论文集[C];2013年
4 邢世和;周碧青;熊德中;许茜;;不同改良剂对烟区土壤生化性质的影响及其与烤烟产量的关系[A];中国地壤学会第十次全国会员代表大会暨第五届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会文集(面向农业与环境的土壤科学专题篇)[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 德州市园林处绿化工程公司 石军;盐碱改良剂“改水有方”[N];中国花卉报;2004年
2 闻广;面包改良剂将制定行业标准[N];经理日报;2009年
3 记者顾政 通讯员赵欣;上海研发出新型豆制品改良剂[N];中国食品报;2010年
4 水清;专用改良剂能显著降低土壤盐分[N];江苏农业科技报;2011年
5 张建宁;YNEC土壤坪床改良剂[N];中国花卉报;2003年
6 何颖思 李婧;面包改良剂未纳入QS管理[N];中国食品质量报;2009年
7 吴立龙;用煅烧高岭土作电性能改良剂[N];中国国土资源报;2003年
8 记者 伍华余;《沙质土壤改良剂及生产应用技术研究》被科技部列为2013年重大科技支撑项目[N];通辽日报;2012年
9 天津市园林部门专家 姜世平 袁东升 赵万苓 王正祥;天津破解绿色禁区的方法(中)[N];中国花卉报;2012年
10 记者 于莘明;新型生化改良剂研制成功[N];科技日报;2000年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 矫威;不同改良剂对作物生长发育及酸性土壤理化性状的影响[D];华中农业大学;2014年
2 逯娟;三种改良剂对蔬菜镉积累及养分吸收的影响[D];四川农业大学;2011年
3 陈志明;不同改良剂修复重金属铬污染土壤的研究[D];山东农业大学;2010年
4 刘丽娟;不同改良剂对镉污染土壤的修复作用及其机理研究[D];南京农业大学;2012年
5 赵晓姝;改良剂对锌铬复合污染水稻土微生物特征的影响[D];四川农业大学;2011年
6 郭丽;重度盐碱土改良剂配方及改良效果的研究[D];吉林农业大学;2007年
7 周磊;沙质土壤改良剂对沙地改良效果的研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2015年
8 汪榕;酸性土壤改良剂在水稻—油菜轮作上的应用效果[D];华中农业大学;2014年
9 毛文娟;不同改良剂对宁夏平罗盐碱土改良研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2010年
10 杨全刚;改良剂组合对盐碱土改良机理及对植物耐盐性影响的研究[D];山东农业大学;2004年
,本文编号:2158496
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2158496.html