施氮量对土壤微生物群落组成特征的影响研究
[Abstract]:Continuous and irrational fertilization measures may destroy soil physical structure and reduce soil microbial activity and richness, and then lead to the weakening of soil fertility. In the agro ecosystem, soil microorganism is the core of soil biological fertility and plays an important role in the circulation of agricultural materials. This paper is dealt with in 6 years of nitrogen fertilizer treatment in a continuous period. Soil, alluvial soil and aeolian sandy soil were studied by using fluorophore detection, phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA), Biolog-ECO microplate, Illumina Mi Seq sequencing, real-time quantitative -PCR and terminal restrictive fragment analysis (T-RFLP) and other modern molecular ecology research methods, and the soil microorganism was systematically analyzed at different levels. Three kinds of soil microbial community structure, carbon source utilization ability and ammonia oxidation process are studied. The microbiology driving mechanism of three fertilizer soils under different nitrogen application and the relationship with soil microecological environment are discussed. The management of rational fertilization and soil nutrient balance, the efficient transformation and distribution of nutrients and sustainable development of farmland are realized. The main results of this paper are as follows: 1. the microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activity in three types of soil were significantly affected by different fertilization treatments. Low nitrogen (168 kg/ha) treatment increased the microbial biomass carbon (SMB-C) content of black soil and alluvial soil, high nitrogen (312 kg/ha) treatment increased the content of SMB-C and SMB-N in the sandy soil; beta glucosidase, urea The activity of enzyme and peroxidase was in the black soil alluvial soil wind sand; nitrogen treatment significantly increased the urease of three kinds of soil (312 Kg/ha except wind sand) and peroxidase in the sand soil; it significantly inhibited the beta glucosidase in alluvial soil, and most of the enzyme activity in the aeolian sandy soil was inhibited (except for the wind sand soil 270 Kg/ha).2. different fertilizer application. The microbial community structure and metabolic function of the three types of soil showed different differences. Nitrogen treatment significantly reduced the total amount of PLFA in black soil and sandy soil, bacteria, fungi, Gram-positive bacteria / Gram-negative bacteria (G~+/G~-) and actinomycetes, which significantly increased the content of fatty acids in alluvial soils (except fungi); in alluvial soil, the content of fatty acids was significantly increased. The composition of the species was significantly different from the other two soils, and the microbial community composition of the black soil and the sandy soil decreased with the increase of nitrogen application, and the high nitrogen (312 kg/ha) treatment significantly reduced the utilization ability of three soil microorganisms to carbon source and changed the microbial microbial community structure of three soil bacteria by different fertilizer treatments. Three kinds of soil were changed. The soil OTUs accounts for the 94.5%-98.4% of the bacteria in the soil. In all the treatments, the dominant bacteria are similar, mainly deformable fungi, acid bacilli and actinomycetes, accounting for the 75%-87% of total OTUs; at the level of the gate, the relative abundance of acid bacilli and alpha deformia is: the black soil alluvial soil, the relative abundance of the alluvial soil is the alluvial soil wind The relative abundances of the gates and nitrifying spiracia were reduced in the sand, and the relative abundance of the Proteus doors, actinomycetes, buds and greenbers, the relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Pseudomonas and the Archaea gates were decreased compared with the treatment of low nitrogen (168 kg/ha), and the Beta diversity analysis showed that no fertilizer was applied to the soil of the high nitrogen (312 kg/ha) and low nitrogen (168). Treatment and low nitrogen (168 kg/ha) treatment and high nitrogen (312 kg/ha) treatment of microbial community composition distinctly, redundant analysis showed that soil P H, organic carbon, total nitrogen and quick acting N were important factors affecting the microbial community composition.4. different fertilization treatments changed the nitrification potential of three types of soil, the abundances of ammonia oxidizing microorganisms Nitrogen treatment improved the nitrification potential (PNA) ability of alluvial soil and black soil, significantly reduced the PNA capacity of sand soil, and the abundance of ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) in three soils was higher than that of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB), but with the increase of nitrogen application, the abundance of AOA and AOB in the sandy soil decreased, and the abundance of AOB in the black soil increased, while the alluvial soil was not in the alluvial soil. The T-RFLP analysis showed that the AOA community structure was more susceptible to different nitrogen application than AOB, especially in the wind sand soil, with the increase of nitrogen application, the community composition diversity of AOA decreased significantly, and the redundancy analysis showed that the AOA community structure was significantly related to the soil P H, TN, NH_4~+-N and NO_3~--N and soil nitrification potential.
【学位授予单位】:吉林农业大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S154.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李娜;张利敏;张雪萍;;土壤微生物群落结构影响因素的探讨[J];哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报;2012年06期
2 夏北成;土壤微生物群落中的无竞争多样性[J];中山大学学报(自然科学版);1998年S2期
3 张瑞福,崔中利,李顺鹏;土壤微生物群落结构研究方法进展[J];土壤;2004年05期
4 王光华;金剑;徐美娜;刘晓冰;;植物、土壤及土壤管理对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J];生态学杂志;2006年05期
5 姚晓华;;土壤微生物群落多样性研究方法及进展[J];广西农业生物科学;2008年S1期
6 龚明;王进;;甲胺磷影响下土壤微生物群落结构的动态平衡[J];南京林业大学学报(自然科学版);2011年03期
7 王方艳;王秋霞;颜冬冬;毛连纲;郭美霞;燕平梅;曹坳程;;二甲基二硫熏蒸对保护地连作土壤微生物群落的影响[J];中国生态农业学报;2011年04期
8 刘国华;叶正芳;吴为中;;土壤微生物群落多样性解析法:从培养到非培养[J];生态学报;2012年14期
9 乌兰图雅;赵建宁;李刚;红梅;刘红梅;王慧;杨殿林;;转双价基因抗虫棉对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J];生态学杂志;2012年10期
10 华建峰;林先贵;蒋倩;张华勇;陈茜;殷云龙;;砷矿区农田土壤微生物群落碳源代谢多样性[J];应用生态学报;2013年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 余素林;汤岳琴;吴晓磊;;土壤微生物群落对原油以及生物强化处理的响应[A];第五次全国土壤生物和生物化学学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
2 刘波;林营志;张秋芳;;土壤微生物群落脂肪酸生物标记分析方法的软件设计与应用[A];中国微生物学会《第二届全国农业微生物研究及产业化研讨会》和《第十一届全国杀虫微生物学术研讨会》暨《湖北省暨武汉市微生物学会和内蒙古微生物学会2008年会》论文摘要[C];2008年
3 马驿;陈杖榴;;恩诺沙星残留对土壤微生物群落碳代谢多样性的影响[A];中国畜牧兽医学会兽医药理毒理学分会第十次研讨会论文摘要集[C];2009年
4 刘波;林营志;张秋芳;;外来生物对土壤微生物群落影响的脂肪酸生物标记辅助分析软件的研制[A];第二届全国生物入侵学术研讨会论文摘要集[C];2008年
5 杨倩;王先之;沈禹颖;南志标;;黄土高原保护性耕作下麦田土壤微生物群落功能多样性特征[A];第八届博士生学术年会论文摘要集[C];2010年
6 华建峰;林先贵;蒋倩;张华勇;殷云龙;;砷矿区农田土壤微生物群落功能多样性研究[A];面向未来的土壤科学(中册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年
7 任改弟;朱春梧;张华勇;朱建国;Tokida Takeshi;Hasegawa Toshihiro;贾仲君;;大气CO_2浓度升高和土壤增温影响日本稻田微生物群落结构[A];面向未来的土壤科学(中册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年
8 马驿;陈杖榴;;恩诺沙星对土壤微生物群落代谢功能多样性的影响[A];微生物实用技术生态环境应用学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
9 焦少俊;单正军;葛峰;;四环素对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[A];中国毒理学会环境与生态毒理学专业委员会第二届学术研讨会暨中国环境科学学会环境标准与基准专业委员会2011年学术研讨会会议论文集[C];2011年
10 吴宇澄;张彩霞;王保战;林先贵;熊正琴;颜晓元;贾仲君;;长期施肥稻田土壤原核生物群落的高通量测序分析[A];面向未来的土壤科学(中册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 华南农大资环学院新肥料研究中心 刘可星 廖宗文;基于土壤生态调控的施肥防病新技术[N];农资导报;2010年
2 周飞 吴建平;森林健康成长与灌草相依相随[N];广东科技报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 于海玲;施氮量对土壤微生物群落组成特征的影响研究[D];吉林农业大学;2017年
2 程飞;秦岭火地塘林区主要森林类型微生物群落特征研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
3 孙盛楠;草甸草原土壤微生物群落结构与多样性对增氮增雨的响应[D];东北师范大学;2015年
4 于洋;两种农药对红松混交林、人工纯林土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[D];东北林业大学;2015年
5 洪丕征;氮添加对南亚热带不同树种人工幼龄林土壤温室气体排放和微生物群落结构的影响[D];中国林业科学研究院;2015年
6 宋超;聚乙烯地膜残留对作物产量、土壤质量以及土壤微生物群落组成的影响[D];兰州大学;2014年
7 王秀国;杀菌剂多菌灵高频投入对土壤微生物群落的影响及其生物修复[D];浙江大学;2009年
8 赵勇;应用分子生物学技术解析不同处理状况下土壤微生物群落结构的变化[D];南京农业大学;2005年
9 刘根林;转基因大豆对根际土壤微生物群落的影响及其多样性指数的度量[D];南京大学;2012年
10 Qaiser Hussain;土壤微生物群落结构及动态随水稻品种和生育期的变化及其农田温室气体释放意义[D];南京农业大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王月;三种外来菊科植物入侵对土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[D];河北科技师范学院;2015年
2 林黎;滩涂围垦和土地利用对土壤微生物群落结构和氨氧化功能群影响的研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
3 郭鹏鹏;两种相同碳链长度的咪唑类离子液体对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[D];山东农业大学;2015年
4 孙鹂;红壤地区三种母质土壤长期熟化条件下的土壤微生物群落分析[D];南京农业大学;2014年
5 王淼;黑龙江省东部林区耕作生态系统土壤微生物群落结构研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2015年
6 周小倩;黑龙江省不同经度耕作生态系统土壤微生物群落结构研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2016年
7 韩潼;不同恢复措施对高寒草甸土壤微生物群落结构的影响[D];兰州大学;2013年
8 郑乔舒;一年生草原土壤微生物群落对大气CO_2浓度升高的响应[D];清华大学;2015年
9 罗影;不同种植模式对胡麻田土壤酶活性和土壤微生物群落结构及多样性的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2016年
10 肖鸿光;两种外来植物共同入侵对土壤微生物群落结构的复合影响[D];江苏大学;2016年
,本文编号:2170252
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2170252.html