水旱轮作秸秆还田条件下氮肥调控和钾肥替代效应研究
[Abstract]:Straw is an important renewable resource in agricultural production. The method of straw returning can not only reduce the pollution of the agricultural ecological environment while the soil is fertilized, but also can maintain the effect of soil productivity and increase the yield and stable yield of grain. With the increasing of straw returning technology, it is based on the straw returning to the field. How to regulate the application of chemical fertilizer so as to ensure the efficient utilization of resources has become a hot spot of research. In this study, the nitrogen fertilizer regulation and potassium fertilizer replacement test under different crop rotation modes in Hubei province were carried out. The application of nitrogen fertilizer and different base chasing under straw returning conditions and straw replacement were studied. The effect of potassium fertilizer is expected to provide a theoretical basis for rational application of nitrogen fertilizer and potassium fertilizer under the condition of straw returning. The main results are as follows: 1. the results of nitrogen fertilizer regulation under the condition of returning straw to field under water and drought rotation have shown that the single season, 1 year rotation and 2 years of continuous rotation of straw under the condition of straw returning to the field have shown that the straw returned to the field compared with the straw. Rice yield, rape and wheat yield, aboveground biomass and nitrogen uptake increased in varying degrees. High application of nitrogen fertilizer (rice 195 kg N/hm2, rapeseed 210 kg N/hm2, wheat 180 kg N/hm2) under the single season straw returning condition compared with the normal nitrogen fertilizer used in rice, rape and wheat yield, aboveground biomass and nitrogen. There was no significant increase in the amount of absorption, while the 1 year rotation and 2 years of continuous rotation of straw had no significant effect on the rice oil rotation system, but there was a significant increase in the crop rotation system for rice and wheat crop rotation system, and the high nitrogen fertilizer applied 3 times to the straw return field for 3 times of application of rice under the.1 year rotation. The average yield increased by 632 and 564 kg/hm2, and the yield increased by 6.85% and 10.67%, respectively, and the average increase of nitrogen uptake by 11.54 and 23.57 kg N/hm2, respectively, was 7.88% and 21.28%, respectively, and the average increase of rice and wheat was 429 and 377 kg/hm2 respectively under the 2 year rotation, and the increase of yield was up to 4.71% and 7.63%, and the nitrogen uptake in the upper part of the ground was respectively. The average increase of 13.98 and 15.27 kg N/hm2 respectively, the increase of 8.81% and 13.10%.2. single season respectively, 1 years and 2 consecutive years of straw returning results show that the constant nitrogen fertilizer 2 combined with straw returning yield, the biomass and nitrogen absorption capacity of the upper ground can reach or better than the normal nitrogen fertilizer habits 3 application level; nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate, In the case of rice, rape and wheat, high nitrogen fertilizer partial productivity can be obtained by constant input. Under the input of nitrogen amount, the effect of straw returning is better than that of straw not returning to the field, and the nitrogen fertilizer application rate can be significantly increased by two application of nitrogen fertilizer under the straw returning condition. Therefore, under the condition of straw returning to the field, the 2 types of water and drought rotation modes can be reduced. The use of less nitrogen fertilizer (i.e., the forward shift of post fertilizer) so as to ensure the crops to achieve high or stable yield, and significantly improve the nitrogen utilization rate of.3. under the condition of straw returning under the condition of straw returning. The results of single season, 1 years and 2 consecutive years of straw returning show that potassium application and straw return can be compared with non potassium treatment (CK). The yield of rice, rape and wheat, aboveground biomass and potassium uptake were increased to different degrees. The effect of 3 kinds of potassium supply soil yield increase was lower potassium supply (12.51% - 126.33%) for potassium (5.57% - 24.54%) higher potassium supply (2.55% - 12.77%). The effect of yield increase of each treatment was better with straw combined with potash fertilizer. Under the condition of medium potassium supply, the yield of +S treatment could reach the level of +K treatment, and the yield of S+1/2K treated crop could reach the level of +K treatment under the condition of medium potassium supply, but under the condition of low potassium supply, S+3/4K treatment in rice season, and S+1/2K treatment in rape and wheat season could reach +K treatment yield. The utilization ratio of the potassium and the utilization rate of potassium in rice is higher than that of the dry land crops (rape, wheat), and the utilization ratio of potassium in higher potassium soil (0.7 - 4.5 kg/kg) and the absorption and utilization ratio (9% - 94.9%) are lower than that of moderate potassium supply (agronomic utilization rate of 0.8 - 12.2 kg/kg). The utilization rate of 11.9% - 119.3%) and low potassium supply soil (agricultural utilization rate 1.6 - 37.1 kg/kg, absorption and utilization ratio 19.7% - 119.3%).4. by calculating the apparent balance of soil crop system potassium found that the soil potassium in each treatment after the harvest of rice season was in the deficit condition, but the loss of straw returning to field was much less than that of straw returning. After the rape and the wheat season harvest, the straw returning to the field can turn to profit (the average of 21.83 - 103.15 kg K2O/hm2 for the rape season surplus, the average of the wheat season surplus is 23.50 - 95.93 kg K2O/hm2), which shows that the straw returning can obviously alleviate the condition of soil potassium deficiency; through the two times equation of one dollar The relationship between the amount of potassium fertilizer and crop yield was fitted with the linear equation, and the suitable amount of potassium fertilizer was compared with the yield of +K treatment. Under the condition of straw returning, the suitable amount of potassium fertilizer for 3 crops in rice, rape and wheat in high potassium, medium potassium and low potassium fields was 29 kg K2O/hm2,32 kg K2O/hm2,48 kg K2O/hm2. At present, compared with 60 kg K2O/hm2, potassium fertilizer can be reduced by 51.7% of potassium fertilizer and 46.7% of medium potassium massif is reduced. Under the condition of 20.0%. anniversary, the amount of potassium fertilizer in rice oil rotation is 31 kg K2O/hm2, the decrease is 48.3%, and the amount of potassium fertilizer in rice wheat rotation is 33 kg K2O/hm2, and the decrease is 45.0%.
【学位授予单位】:华中农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S141.4;S143
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶培韬;水旱轮作的农业生态效应探讨[J];农村生态环境;1986年01期
2 叶培韬;对水旱轮作农业生态效应的探讨[J];生态学杂志;1988年02期
3 Kwon,T.R,陈德刚;不同水旱轮作系统的产量和收益比较[J];绵阳经济技术高等专科学校学报;1995年04期
4 辽宁省盐碱地利用研究所水旱轮作课题组;辽河下游沿海稻区水旱轮作的研究(1)[J];垦殖与稻作;1998年02期
5 张邦定;菜──菜──稻 水旱轮作套种栽培[J];四川农业科技;2000年08期
6 建农;;水旱轮作田机械化保护性耕作创新项目通过验收[J];农业装备技术;2010年04期
7 ;日本水旱轮作研究简况[J];广西农业科学;1964年03期
8 沈鸣鼎;水旱轮作试验示范初步总结[J];湖北农业科学;1979年03期
9 ;浅谈水旱轮作[J];棉花;1980年03期
10 李德芳;水旱轮作 养地增产[J];新农业;1981年19期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 ;四川省农业科学院&中国农业大学理论与实践结合的水旱轮作研究小组[A];第九届中国青年土壤科学工作者学术讨论会暨第四届中国青年植物营养与肥料科学工作者学术讨论会论文集[C];2004年
2 吴建凤;;稻-毛豆水旱轮作高产栽培技术[A];福建省科协第五届学术年会提高海峡西岸经济区农业综合生产能力分会场论文集[C];2005年
3 高文玲;卞新民;吴洁;郭伟;孙金福;李胜;杜磊;石建福;;沟埋还田不同埋草量对冬季稻田CO_2排放的影响[A];发展低碳农业 应对气候变化——低碳农业研讨会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 邢定生;农民自发水旱轮作给我们什么启示[N];玉溪日报;2012年
2 本报通讯员 郑兴法;杜桥镇探索稻菜水旱轮作种植新模式[N];台州日报;2012年
3 东台市农科所 周传珠 林红梅 周小燕;早春大栅豇豆与荸荠水旱轮作[N];江苏农业科技报;2012年
4 记者 周澜源;中欧试验田“飞出”女状元[N];苏州日报;2011年
5 扬中市蔬菜技术指导站 陆阳平 王华;大棚浅水菱、秧草水旱轮作[N];江苏农业科技报;2014年
6 余宏章;良种不可没有良田[N];江苏农业科技报;2007年
7 江苏里下河地区农科所 张瑛 李爱民 惠飞虎 周如美 祁建波 张永泰;青花菜与慈姑或荸荠水旱轮作(下)[N];江苏农业科技报;2011年
8 徐莲;莲藕腐败病 还需从根治[N];云南日报;2003年
9 詹存钰 孔有利 吴爱民;水旱轮作——设施大棚连作障碍的克星[N];江苏农业科技报;2012年
10 安徽省化肥工业协会 张乐彬;安徽低浓度磷肥占磷肥总量60%[N];农资导报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 林陶;汞在水旱轮作系统的释放特征及其影响因素[D];西南大学;2007年
2 石孝均;水旱轮作体系中的养分循环特征[D];中国农业大学;2003年
3 范明生;水旱轮作系统养分资源综合管理研究[D];中国农业大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘永亮;水旱轮作对设施连作番茄土壤特性的影响研究[D];宁夏大学;2015年
2 陈洪俊;稻田水旱轮作系统生产力、生态环境效应及可持续性评价[D];江西农业大学;2015年
3 黄杰;水旱轮作体系下水—旱转换过程中土壤养分变化规律研究[D];四川农业大学;2015年
4 李程;水旱轮作条件下水旱转换过程对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[D];四川农业大学;2015年
5 郑雁宾;江苏省农药生产与应用及水旱轮作区农户农药使用现状研究[D];南京农业大学;2013年
6 卓福昌;四川省主要稻作区水旱轮作模式调查与综合评价[D];四川农业大学;2015年
7 张沁怡;水旱轮作和腐殖酸对水稻生物学特性的影响研究[D];湖南农业大学;2015年
8 张维乐;水旱轮作秸秆还田条件下氮肥调控和钾肥替代效应研究[D];华中农业大学;2016年
9 廖世鹏;水分和氮肥相互作用对水旱轮作体系氮素转化的影响[D];华中农业大学;2016年
10 仲建锋;水旱轮作模式效益分析与推广研究[D];浙江农林大学;2012年
,本文编号:2171288
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2171288.html