伦理学容量与农业文明发展的史学启示
发布时间：2018-12-12 14:08
【摘要】：伦理学容量意指社会伦理观对各类社会组分的系统性包容,藉以保持社会稳定。社会在系统耦合中发生系统进化,释放生产潜力,推动社会进步。系统耦合与系统相悖并发。前者释放生产潜力,为社会进步的正值,后者反之,为系统进步的负值。中国农业社会为城乡二元结构,其系统耦合所生产正值,即社会效益,绝大部分为社会强势的城市占有,是为社会发展的受益方;而系统相悖发生的负值,则由社会弱势方农村全部承担,所获社会发展效益甚少,或根本不得效益,是为社会发展的少受益方,或受害方。因而城市与乡村形成利益对立的双方。以往对社会进化弱势群体关注不足,或阻碍社会发展,或发展为社会乱源。在皇权社会的农耕文明,勉强保持了伦理学容量的脆弱稳定。但在后工业化的今天,社会系统多元化迅速发展,多重系统耦合与系统相悖并存,其社会矛盾远非原来的农耕文明伦理容量所能包容。中国农民从西周以来所背负的不公正待遇,引发系列社会问题,严重阻碍社会发展。当前全球一体化的大潮下,社会发展势不可挡,实现农业现代化势所必然,与之相适应的伦理学容量势必巨大扩容,新的农业伦理学已经曙光初现。
[Abstract]:Ethical capacity refers to the systematic tolerance of social ethics to various social components in order to maintain social stability. In the system coupling, the society evolves systematically, releases the productive potential, and promotes the social progress. System coupling is incompatible with system concurrency. The former releases the potential of production for the positive value of social progress, whereas the latter is negative for the progress of the system. China's agricultural society is urban-rural dual structure, its system coupling production positive, namely social benefits, most of the strong social urban occupation, is the beneficiary of social development; However, the negative value of the system will be borne by the socially disadvantaged rural areas, and the social development benefits will be very little or no benefit at all. It is the less beneficiary or the aggrieved party of the social development. As a result, cities and villages form the interests of the two opposing sides. In the past, insufficient attention was paid to the social evolution of vulnerable groups, or hindered social development, or developed into a source of social disorder. In the imperial society, the farming civilization managed to maintain the fragile stability of ethical capacity. However, in the post-industrialization era, the social system is developing rapidly, and the coupling of multiple systems and the contradiction of the system coexist, and the social contradiction is far from the original ethical capacity of agricultural civilization. The unfair treatment of Chinese farmers since the Western Zhou Dynasty has caused a series of social problems and seriously hindered social development. Under the current tide of global integration, the social development is unstoppable, the realization of agricultural modernization is inevitable, the corresponding capacity of ethics is bound to be greatly expanded, and the new agricultural ethics has emerged at the dawn.
【作者单位】： 中国草业发展战略研究中心草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室农业部草牧业创新重点实验室;兰州大学哲学社会学院;
【基金】：中国工程院重点咨询项目“中国草业发展战略研究” 2016年国家社科基金西部项目“生态文明战略视域中的‘中国农业伦理学’研究”(16XZX013)
【分类号】：S-09
本文编号：2374713
[Abstract]:Ethical capacity refers to the systematic tolerance of social ethics to various social components in order to maintain social stability. In the system coupling, the society evolves systematically, releases the productive potential, and promotes the social progress. System coupling is incompatible with system concurrency. The former releases the potential of production for the positive value of social progress, whereas the latter is negative for the progress of the system. China's agricultural society is urban-rural dual structure, its system coupling production positive, namely social benefits, most of the strong social urban occupation, is the beneficiary of social development; However, the negative value of the system will be borne by the socially disadvantaged rural areas, and the social development benefits will be very little or no benefit at all. It is the less beneficiary or the aggrieved party of the social development. As a result, cities and villages form the interests of the two opposing sides. In the past, insufficient attention was paid to the social evolution of vulnerable groups, or hindered social development, or developed into a source of social disorder. In the imperial society, the farming civilization managed to maintain the fragile stability of ethical capacity. However, in the post-industrialization era, the social system is developing rapidly, and the coupling of multiple systems and the contradiction of the system coexist, and the social contradiction is far from the original ethical capacity of agricultural civilization. The unfair treatment of Chinese farmers since the Western Zhou Dynasty has caused a series of social problems and seriously hindered social development. Under the current tide of global integration, the social development is unstoppable, the realization of agricultural modernization is inevitable, the corresponding capacity of ethics is bound to be greatly expanded, and the new agricultural ethics has emerged at the dawn.
【作者单位】： 中国草业发展战略研究中心草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室农业部草牧业创新重点实验室;兰州大学哲学社会学院;
【基金】：中国工程院重点咨询项目“中国草业发展战略研究” 2016年国家社科基金西部项目“生态文明战略视域中的‘中国农业伦理学’研究”(16XZX013)
【分类号】：S-09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李镇清，，任继周;能网自组织与生态系统耦合[J];草业学报;1995年02期
2 万里强,李向林;系统耦合及其对农业系统的作用[J];草业学报;2002年03期
3 李奇睿;王继军;;退耕背景下安塞县商品型生态农业系统耦合关系[J];农业工程学报;2011年09期
本文编号：2374713
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2374713.html
