当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 农业技术论文 >

基于BME和NNE法的农田土壤水分和养分空间插值

发布时间:2019-06-24 23:39
【摘要】:精准农业强调通过对农田资源的分布式调控,尽可能均衡、合理地利用其生产潜力,获取尽可能高的经济产量或显著的社会效益。掌握农田土壤水分和养分的空间分布规律是分布式调控的前提条件,而基于有限的采样数据进行空间插值则是掌握农田土壤水分和养分变异规律的有效途径,对于实现农田的精确灌溉和变量施肥具有重要意义。本文以江苏省扬州市北部某农田上161个采样点的含水量、全氮量、有机质、碱解氮、速效钾、速效磷含量为例,针对研究区土壤变量的空间变异特征,结合所采用的空间插值方法的特点,开展了如下研究:①利用研究区不同田块之间土壤特性差异显著、同一田块无显著差异的特点,用同一田块内土壤变量的分布特征表达待估点估值的不确定性(即构造软数据),并将此软数据和实测硬数据结合,利用现代地质统计学方法——贝叶斯最大熵法(BME)模拟土壤变量的空间分布(该方法以下简称MVBME法);②利用神经网络方法良好的非线性表达能力,借助集成神经网络系统估计待估点的不确定性(即构造软数据),并将其结果融入BME法中,用融入该软数据的BME法(以下简称NNEBME法)模拟土壤变量的空间分布。③采取多种随机抽样方案(建模样本和验证样本),将以上空间模拟结果分别与径向基函数神经网络法(RBF)、集成神经网络法(NNE)、普通克立格法(OK)、残差克立格法(RK)的估值结果进行比较。得出的主要研究结果如下:1)研究区内土壤含水量呈弱变异性,养分均属中等程度变异。且研究区内整个试验田的变异性比单块要大很多,不同田块之间土壤特性差异达到极显著,同一田块多属无显著性差异。2)特异值处理前,含水量、全氮量、有机质、碱解氮都近似服从正态分布,速效钾与速效磷不服从正态分布,处理特异值后土壤水分及养分的空间分布均近似服从正态分布。3)MVBME法对研究区内土壤水分与养分进行空间插值,并将结果与RBF法、RK法和OK法的插值结果进行比较得出:MVBME法的平均误差(ME)为四种插值方法中最小,估计方差(MSE)相较RBF法能降低23.77%-69.14%:相比较RE法,能降低0.41%-56.17%:与OK法相比,MVBME法能使有机质、碱解氮、速效钾、速效磷的MSE降低6.24%~52.37%,水分与全氮量在大部分情况下能降低10.25%-38.18%。四种插值方法里.MVBME法最接近于无偏估计,且对变量空间波动程度反映最精确。4)NNEBME法对研究区土壤含水量与养分进行空间差值,其结果与NNE法、RK法和OK法进行比较得出:对于不同的土壤变量,NNEBME法估值的ME最接近于零,近似无偏估计;与NNE法比较,MSE缩小1.64%~45.20%,与OK法、RK法比较,除土壤水分外,NNEBME法使MSE缩小0-40.05%:并且随着已知点(即建模数据样本容量)个数的减少,NNEBME法的插值优势更为突出;MSE的组成分析表明,NNEBME法对变量均值的估计与波动程度的描述更为精确。本文利用农田土壤变量的空间变异特征和估值方法的特点,构建了能为BME法有效利用的软数据,不仅拓展了现代地质统计学的BME方法在农业水土科学领域的应用范围,而且为农田土壤水分和养分空间分布模拟精度的改善提供了新思路。
[Abstract]:The precision agriculture emphasizes the distribution and regulation of the farmland resources, as well as possible balance and reasonable utilization of the production potential of the farmland resources, so as to obtain the highest possible economic output or remarkable social benefit. The spatial distribution of soil moisture and nutrients in farmland is a prerequisite for distributed regulation, and spatial interpolation based on limited sampling data is an effective way to master the law of soil moisture and nutrient variation of the farmland. It is of great significance to realize the precise irrigation and variable fertilization of the farmland. In this paper, the water content, total nitrogen content, organic matter, alkaline solution nitrogen, quick-acting potassium and quick-acting phosphorus content of 161 sampling points on a farmland in the northern part of Yangzhou city of Jiangsu Province are taken as an example. in that invention, the soil characteristic difference between the different field blocks in the study area is obviously different, the characteristic of no significant difference of the same field block is used, the uncertainty of the estimation of the point to be evaluated (i. e., the soft data is construct) is expressed by the distribution characteristic of the soil variable in the same field block, and the soft data and the measured hard data are combined, The spatial distribution of the soil variable is simulated by the modern geostatistical method _ Bayesian Maximum Entropy Method (BME) (this method is referred to as the MVBME method), and the nonlinear expression ability of the soil variable is good by using the neural network method. The uncertainty of the point to be evaluated (i.e., the soft data) is estimated by the integrated neural network system, and the result is integrated into the BME method, and the spatial distribution of the soil variable is simulated by the BME method (hereinafter referred to as the NNEBME method) incorporated into the soft data. The results of the above-mentioned space simulation are compared with the estimation results of the radial basis function neural network method (RBF), the integrated neural network method (NNE), the ordinary Kriging (OK) and the residual Kriging (RK). The main results of the study are as follows:1) The soil water content in the study area is weak and the nutrient is of medium degree variation. and the variation ratio of the whole test field in the study area is much larger than that of the single block, the difference of the soil characteristics between the different field blocks is very significant, and there is no significant difference in the same field block.2) Before the specific value is treated, the water content, the total nitrogen amount, the organic matter and the alkaline solution nitrogen are all approximately subject to normal distribution, The spatial distribution of the soil water and nutrients in the study area was estimated by MVBME method, and the results were compared with the results of the RBF method, the RK method and the OK method. The mean error (ME) of the MVBME method is the least in the four interpolation methods, and the estimated variance (MSE) can be reduced by 23.77%-69.14% compared with the RBF method. Compared with the OK method, the MVBME method can reduce the MSE of the organic matter, the alkaline solution nitrogen, the quick-acting potassium and the quick-acting phosphorus by 6.24% to 52.37%, Water and total nitrogen can be reduced by 10.25% to 38.18% in most cases. In four interpolation methods. The MVBME method is closest to the unbiased estimation, and the spatial difference of soil water content and nutrients in the study area is reflected by the NNEBME method. The results are compared with the NNE method, the RK method and the OK method. Compared with the NNE method, the MSE is reduced by 1.64% to 45.20%, compared with the OK method and the RK method, the MSE is reduced by 0-40.05% in addition to the soil moisture, and the interpolation advantage of the NNEBME method is more prominent with the reduction of the number of known points (i.e., the sample capacity of the modeling data); the analysis of the composition of the MSE shows that, The NNNME method is more accurate to estimate the mean value of the variable and the degree of fluctuation. By using the characteristics of the spatial variation and the estimation method of the farmland soil variable, the soft data which can be effectively utilized by the BME method is constructed, and the application range of the BME method of the modern geostatistics in the field of agricultural water and soil science is not only expanded, But also provides a new thought for improving the soil moisture and the distribution of the nutrient spatial distribution of the farmland.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S152.7;S158

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵秀兰;利用土壤蓄水量研究区域农田土壤水分时空分布状况[J];新疆气象;2001年03期

2 郁进元;何岩;赵忠福;王栋;;农田土壤水分各种测量方法的比较与分析[J];浙江水利科技;2007年06期

3 刘芳;刘世亮;介晓磊;曾一民;化党领;;豫中沙薄农田土壤水分动态变化分析[J];中国农学通报;2008年07期

4 朱建强;刘会宁;耿显波;黄智敏;;易涝易渍农田土壤水分变化及分析[J];长江大学学报(自然科学版)农学卷;2008年03期

5 宗吉;落桑旺姆;;山南地区泽当站农田土壤水分变化特征分析[J];西藏农业科技;2009年01期

6 王仰仁;孙书洪;叶澜涛;韩娜娜;;农田土壤水分二区模型的研究[J];水利学报;2009年08期

7 马英;;农田土壤水分的研究[J];华北水利水电学院学报;2009年05期

8 张增林;郁晓庆;;基于无线传感器网络的农田土壤水分监测系统(英文)[J];Agricultural Science & Technology;2012年01期

9 王改兰;段建南;李栓怀;张进峰;;砖窑沟流域旱地农田土壤水分平衡研究初报[J];中国科学院水利部西北水土保持研究所集刊(黄土高原区域治理技术体系与效益评价专集);1989年01期

10 韩仕峰,李玉山,张孝中,史竹叶;提高黄土高原农田土壤水分利用的主要途径[J];水土保持通报;1990年06期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 王仰仁;孙书洪;王文龙;孙新忠;;农田土壤水分动态模拟研究[A];变化环境下的水资源响应与可持续利用——中国水利学会水资源专业委员会2009学术年会论文集[C];2009年

2 毛飞;刘晓宏;胡秋卷;张佳华;刘秀江;赵晓飞;;中子仪测定气候观测场和农田土壤水分的试验研究[A];新世纪气象科技创新与大气科学发展——中国气象学会2003年年会“农业气象与生态环境”分会论文集[C];2003年

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 中化化肥高级顾问 中国农业大学教授 曹一平;秋分:又到整地施肥时[N];农资导报;2013年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 邓天宏;河南省农田土壤水分变化规律及动态预报研究[D];南京信息工程大学;2005年

2 高凤莲;农田土壤水分时空变异特征及水量平衡分析[D];中国农业大学;2004年

3 张聪聪;气候变化对太湖地区典型农田土壤水分影响的研究[D];南京农业大学;2014年

4 王磊;石羊河流域农田土壤水分有效性评价及动态模拟[D];西北农林科技大学;2014年

5 魏国栓;农田土壤水分遥感反演及其时空变异特征分析[D];南京信息工程大学;2008年

6 李艳芳;西安地区苹果林地与农田土壤水分变化研究[D];陕西师范大学;2009年

7 李天霄;北方季节性冻土区农田土壤水分运动规律研究[D];东北农业大学;2010年

8 高瞻;基于光谱分析的农田土壤水分与养分测定方法研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2013年

9 张颀;灌区农田土壤水分运移模型研究与预测[D];新疆农业大学;2005年

10 夏冰;基于BME和NNE法的农田土壤水分和养分空间插值[D];扬州大学;2015年



本文编号:2505459

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2505459.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1620d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com