战争类建筑遗产的警示性价值与保护研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 09:25

本文选题：战争　切入点：建筑遗产　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：作为历史事件的物质载体，建筑遗产不仅承载了在史学家或公众眼中被界定为符合历史发展主流方向，积极的、正面的、荣耀的历史事件，，同时还承载着那些有悖于历史发展的主流方向，消极的、甚至耻辱的负面历史事件。实际上，建筑只是事件的载体，真正富有历史意义、带有可评判性色彩的是建筑所承载的历史事件，而非建筑物本身。战争类建筑遗产所承载的历史事件正是所谓的负面事件。虽然战场上存在正义的战争，然而只要有人类的牺牲，就是消极事件，值得警示。由于人类对于民族荣耀性的追求，导致承载正面事件的遗产备受关注，而承载负面事件的战争类遗产却难以得到人们一致的认可，这正是源于人们习惯于将对负面事件的情绪转嫁到建筑遗产之上。在一些人眼中，似乎对这类建筑遗产价值的接受，就意味着对那些黑暗的历史事件的政治认同，甚至意味着对那段不光彩的过去的缅怀。正是因为人们对战争类建筑遗产认识的不足，导致这类遗产曾经长期处于一种尴尬的、窘迫的困境之中。基于建筑遗产的不可再生性，该类建筑遗产在很长一段时间里遭到不同程度的损坏甚至流失。随着社会的进步，人们对于战争类建筑遗产的认识正在不断加深。事实上，这些具有负面性、屈辱性的事件依附在建筑遗产上，随着人类历史的发展进程，已经逐步转化成为警示性事件，进而赋予建筑遗产以警示性价值。本文对该类遗产的警示性价值研究，正是要深化人们对于该类遗产所包含的警示性价值的认识，并指出这一警示性价值对民族、对国家、对社会所发挥的正面历史作用。本文结合交叉研究法、定性分析法、个案研究法和信息总结法全面展开研究。全文共分为四个部分，在对哲学价值和建筑价值体系研究的基础之上，以战争类建筑遗产为切入点，从建筑遗产的事件性出发，通过对现有该类建筑遗产的分类、比对和分析，探究战争类建筑遗产的警示性价值体现，并以此为基础分析我国与柏林等地区的警示性建筑遗产在国际范围内所获得的不同待遇，其目的在于总结当前我国建筑文化遗产保护事业在针对具有警示性价值的遗产保护工作上的不足。进而，提出对于具有警示性价值的建筑遗产的保护标准及保护模式。希望借此研究，可以明确战争类建筑遗产警示性价值的内涵和意义，摆正具有警示性价值的建筑遗产的历史位置，为它们提供一个安全的社会平台，同时为我国此类建筑遗产的保护工作提供可资借鉴的理论以及实践依据。
[Abstract]:As a material carrier of historical events, architectural heritage not only carries historical events that are defined in the eyes of historians or the public as being in line with the mainstream direction of historical development, positive, positive and glorious historical events. At the same time, it also carries negative historical events that are contrary to the mainstream direction of historical development, negative and even humiliating. In fact, architecture is only the carrier of events, and it is truly of historical significance. It is the historical events that the architecture carries, not the building itself, that are judgmental. The historical events carried by the architectural heritage of war are the so-called negative events. Although there is a just war on the battlefield, as long as there is human sacrifice, it is a negative event, which is worth warning because of the pursuit of national glory by mankind. The legacy that leads to positive events is the focus of attention, while the legacy of war, which carries negative events, is difficult to obtain unanimous recognition. This is because people are used to passing on negative emotions to architectural heritage. In the eyes of some, an acceptance of the value of such a building heritage means a political acceptance of those dark historical events. It even means a memory of the disgraced past. It is precisely because of people's lack of understanding of the architectural heritage of war that such heritage has been in an awkward, awkward predicament for a long time. Based on the non-renewable nature of the architectural heritage, This kind of architectural heritage has been damaged or even lost in different degrees for a long time. With the progress of society, people's understanding of the architectural heritage of war is deepening. In fact, these negative and humiliating events are attached to the architectural heritage, and with the development of human history, The research on the warning value of this kind of heritage is to deepen people's understanding of the warning value of this kind of heritage. It also points out that this warning value plays a positive historical role to the nation, the country and the society. This paper, combined with cross-research, qualitative analysis, case study and information summarization, is divided into four parts, which are based on the study of philosophical value and architectural value system. Taking war architectural heritage as the breakthrough point, starting from the event of architectural heritage, through the classification, comparison and analysis of the existing architectural heritage, this paper explores the warning value of war architectural heritage. And on the basis of this analysis of China and Berlin and other regions of the warning architectural heritage in the international scope of the different treatment, Its purpose is to sum up the deficiency in the protection of architectural cultural heritage in our country at present, aiming at the protection of heritage with cautionary value. This paper puts forward the protection standard and protection mode of architectural heritage with cautionary value. It is hoped that the connotation and significance of war-related architectural heritage warning value can be clarified, and the historical position of architectural heritage with warning value can be straightened out. It provides a safe social platform for them and provides theoretical and practical basis for the protection of this kind of architectural heritage in China.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：TU-87

【相似文献】