荷兰国家基础设施与空间规划战略的评估与启示
发布时间：2018-10-29 19:48
【摘要】：荷兰的空间规划作为公共政策的典型,其规划评估体系十分先进成熟,覆盖了规划的编制与运行的全过程。与此对照,我国城镇规划的实施评估刚刚起步,尚未形成连续动态的评估系统。本文介绍了荷兰于2012年出台的《国家基础设施与空间规划战略》的制定过程,并对其实施前后的规划评估体系进行了深入研究,重点评述了实施前评估中的预评估和战略环评的内容、方法及程序,探讨了各阶段评估的意义及对规划的影响,并对我国规划评估机制的完善提出若干建议。
[Abstract]:As a typical public policy, the planning evaluation system of Netherlands is very advanced and mature, covering the whole process of planning preparation and operation. In contrast, the implementation of urban planning evaluation in China has just started, and has not yet formed a continuous dynamic evaluation system. This paper introduces the development process of the National Infrastructure and Spatial Planning Strategy, which was published in the Netherlands in 2012, and makes an in-depth study of the planning and evaluation system before and after its implementation. The contents, methods and procedures of pre-evaluation and strategic environmental assessment in pre-implementation assessment are emphatically reviewed. The significance of each stage assessment and its impact on planning are discussed, and some suggestions for perfecting the planning evaluation mechanism in China are put forward.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学建筑与艺术学院城市规划系;
【基金】：住房和城乡建设部2013年科技计划软科学研究项目(2013-R2-43) 辽宁省社科联2014年度辽宁经济社会发展立项课题(20141slktzdian-12)
【分类号】：TU984;TU99
[Abstract]:As a typical public policy, the planning evaluation system of Netherlands is very advanced and mature, covering the whole process of planning preparation and operation. In contrast, the implementation of urban planning evaluation in China has just started, and has not yet formed a continuous dynamic evaluation system. This paper introduces the development process of the National Infrastructure and Spatial Planning Strategy, which was published in the Netherlands in 2012, and makes an in-depth study of the planning and evaluation system before and after its implementation. The contents, methods and procedures of pre-evaluation and strategic environmental assessment in pre-implementation assessment are emphatically reviewed. The significance of each stage assessment and its impact on planning are discussed, and some suggestions for perfecting the planning evaluation mechanism in China are put forward.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学建筑与艺术学院城市规划系;
【基金】：住房和城乡建设部2013年科技计划软科学研究项目(2013-R2-43) 辽宁省社科联2014年度辽宁经济社会发展立项课题(20141slktzdian-12)
【分类号】：TU984;TU99
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 欧阳鹏;;公共政策视角下城市规划评估模式与方法初探[J];城市规划;2008年12期
2 宋彦;江志勇;杨晓春;陈燕萍;;北美城市规划评估实践经验及启示[J];规划师;2010年03期
3 多米尼克·斯特德;文森特·纳丁;许玫;;欧洲空间规划体系和福利制度:以荷兰为例[J];国际城市规划;2009年02期
4 汪军;陈曦;;西方规划评估机制的概述——基本概念、内容、方法演变以及对中国的启示[J];国际城市规划;2011年06期
5 王秋元;汉克·欧文科;;承前启后发展荷兰整体性长期规划——专访荷兰住房、空间规划与环境部国土规划司司长汉克·欧文科[J];国际城市规划;2009年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张磊;王晨;;基于内容分析法的中美城市规划公共政策议题比较研究[J];城市发展研究;2011年11期
2 周金晶;李枫;陈景进;;省域城镇体系规划实施评估的框架构建设想[J];城市规划;2011年08期
3 魏广君;董伟;孙晖;;“多规整合”研究进展与评述[J];城市规划学刊;2012年01期
4 杨卡;;基于公共政策视阈的城市规划决策方法探析[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
5 郭W，
本文编号：2298640
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2298640.html
