RC框架结构整体抗震性能系数与综合反应修正系数研究
[Abstract]:The overall seismic performance factor (SPFs) of the structure is the general name of the "Structural response correction factor R", the "overall super-strong coefficient (RS)" and the "displacement amplification factor Cd". They are the key factors to determine the design earthquake force based on the seismic design of the bearing capacity, and also the main basis for determining the non-elastic response spectrum of the isoductility based on the performance anti-seismic design. The seismic design code of the countries such as the United States, Europe and Japan mainly uses the structural response correction factor to reduce the elastic response under the fortification intensity to determine the seismic force to take into account the shadow of the ductility of different types of structures. in that present world, however, the value of the seismic performance coefficient in the national seismic design code or standard of the world is mainly determined according to the experience, and the difference between the specifications is great, and therefore, in order to reasonably quantify the overall seismic performance of the structure, The number of FEMA P695 in the United States has put forward a scientific and reasonable probability-seismic performance evaluation method to evaluate whether the structure designed by the overall seismic performance coefficient specified in the current anti-seismic code can meet the expected anti-collapse performance. The seismic code before 1978 is defined by the structural influence coefficient (that is, the reciprocal of the structural response correction coefficient) and the elastic seismic force under the seismic fortification intensity to define the design earthquake. However, in the three versions of the anti-seismic code revised later in 1989, the concept of the structural influence coefficient is abandoned, and the total horizontal seismic effect is directly calculated by using the elastic design response spectrum under the mode of the public value intensity (small earthquake). For this reason, a lot of domestic scholars have made a reflection on the existing seismic force theory and the small-shock elastic design method of the current anti-seismic code, and the overall anti-seismic performance coefficient of the steel structure is in-depth. The research of the overall seismic performance coefficient of the reinforced concrete structure Therefore, the quantitative and evaluation of the overall seismic performance coefficient of the reinforced concrete structure is studied in-depth, which is the key scientific problem of the transformation of the elastic design force to the ductility design earthquake force, and is also an important basis of the performance-based seismic design theory. The solution of this problem is the scientific, reasonable and economical to improve the seismic design of the engineering structure in China. It is of great theoretical significance and present to promote the performance design theory as soon as possible in our country's application. In this paper, we design 17 typical reinforced concrete frame structures with different number of layers, and use OpenSees to carry out the finite element method. The model and analysis are carried out by using the vibration table test data of the research group and the test data of the Tsinghua University; for the typical structure designed, the demand value and the capability value of the integral anti-seismic performance coefficient are introduced into the system by using the nonlinear static method and the nonlinear dynamic method, respectively. In-depth analysis, the concept of capacity demand ratio is used to evaluate the overall anti-seismic performance coefficient from the definite angle, and the reasonable value of the anti-seismic performance coefficient is integrated by the combination of the adjustment collapse margin ratio and the displacement demand capacity coefficient method. The probability rating is finally given. In this paper, the robustness of the continuous collapse of the damage structure is seldom considered for the research of the seismic performance coefficient at home and abroad, and the structure is further proposed based on the traditional structural response correction factors. The concept of k> is introduced, and the seismic performance of the damaged structure is evaluated by introducing the anti-seismic robustness coefficient, so that the structure continuity under the earthquake action is considered in the anti-seismic design. The effect of the collapse. The content of the study is as follows:1) According to the current seismic design code in China, we have designed 17 RC frame structures with different levels, based on the seismic engineering simulation platform, OpenSees, and established 17 structures. The correctness of the OpenSees model in this paper is verified by the comparison and analysis of the structure vibration table test and the structure quasi-static collapse test. On the basis of this, the nonlinear static method and the nonlinear dynamic method are used to analyze the RC frame structure and obtain the overall seismic performance coefficient of the structure at the time of the "critical collapse state". 2) The static capacity spectrum method, the power capability spectrum method and the time history analysis method are respectively used for analyzing the designed RC frame structure, and the structure is obtained under the action of different intensity demand spectrum. The paper puts forward the concept and calculation method of the capacity demand ratio of the structural anti-seismic performance coefficient, and from the certainty angle to the RC frame structure implied by the anti-seismic code of China. The seismic performance coefficient is evaluated. On the basis of this, the demand value of the structural reaction correction coefficient under the effect of the rare earthquake in this paper is further adopted, and the multi-meeting earthquake is given in the seismic code of China. The influence coefficient curve is modified.3) The combined application adjusts the collapse margin ratio (ACMR) and the displacement demand capacity factor method (DCFM) to determine whether the designed structure has a consistent risk level and structure of anti-collapse probability and whether the structure meets the "trunk>" critical collection " un K> The performance objective is comprehensively evaluated, and the overall anti-seismic performance coefficient of the RC frame structure is evaluated from the angle of uncertainty and given. The proposed value of the structural response correction factor (4) is based on the "lateral continuous collapse" failure mode, and adopts the Pushover method based on the backup load path, the static capacity spectrum method, the IDA method and the displacement demand capacity coefficient method, and the designed structure is respectively obtained from the angle of the strength, the energy consumption and the deformation, The anti-lateral continuous collapse capability is studied, and the robustness index based on the bearing capacity is expanded to Robustness index based on spectral acceleration and deformation is obtained. The structural response correction coefficient is modified by the structure anti-lateral continuous collapse robustness coefficient, and the side-to-side continuous collapse is obtained. In view of the failure mode of the "vertical continuous collapse", a Pashdown analysis method considering the failure loading scheme of the component and a vertical IDA analysis method considering the failure time of the component are adopted to analyze the damage structure in the initial yield state, the overall yield state and the bearing. The ability to resist vertical continuous collapse when the capacity is in a limit state and is obtained and the corresponding anti-vertical continuous collapse robustness index is adopted, and the vertical continuous collapse robustness coefficient is adopted, In this paper, the comprehensive response correction coefficient of the structure is modified. On this basis, the structure synthesis reaction correction coefficient is adopted to obtain the structure design earthquake action, and the seismic design is realized. The effect of the failure mode of the continuous collapse of the structure is considered in this paper. Through the research of the above-mentioned contents, it is found that the structure designed by using the overall seismic performance coefficient of the structure implied by the current anti-seismic code can meet the expected anti-collapse performance target. However, the value of the overall seismic performance coefficient of the structure is more conservative, and the recommended value of the structural response correction coefficient is given in this paper, so as to promote the design and performance of the shock-resistant standard from the small earthquake to the middle-shock ductility design and the performance design. In this paper, the theoretical reference for the application of the seismic code in China is provided. At the same time, the influence of the structure's anti-lateral continuous collapse and the robustness of the anti-vertical continuous collapse can be considered in a unified way, and the influence of the structure's anti-lateral continuous collapse and the robustness of the anti-vertical continuous collapse can be considered in a unified way, so that the
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:TU352.11;TU375.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙国华;何若全;顾强;郁银泉;方有珍;;半刚接钢框架内填RC墙结构超强及强度折减系数研究[J];北京工业大学学报;2009年10期
2 卓卫东,范立础;结构抗震设计中的强度折减系数研究[J];地震工程与工程振动;2001年01期
3 李英民,白绍良,赖明;不同地震水准反应谱之间的关系和罕遇地震作用设计反应谱的确定[J];地震工程与工程振动;2003年06期
4 翟长海,公茂盛,张茂花,谢礼立,张敏政;工程结构等延性地震抗力谱研究[J];地震工程与工程振动;2004年01期
5 吕西林,周定松;考虑场地类别与设计分组的延性需求谱和弹塑性位移反应谱[J];地震工程与工程振动;2004年01期
6 李国强;孙飞飞;;关于钢结构抗震存在的问题及建议[J];地震工程与工程振动;2006年03期
7 季静;韩小雷;郑宜;王建区;陈勇;杨坤;;基于能力设计原理的双肢剪力墙极限承载力研究[J];地震工程与工程振动;2006年04期
8 白绍良;李刚强;李英民;韦锋;;从R-μ-T关系研究成果看我国钢筋混凝土结构的抗震措施[J];地震工程与工程振动;2006年05期
9 李英民;吴雪萍;韦峰;白绍良;;按中、欧规范设计的钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性态的对比分析[J];地震工程与工程振动;2007年06期
10 李英民;刘兰花;韦锋;白绍良;;钢筋混凝土框架体系R-μ关系的分析验证[J];地震工程与工程振动;2008年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨俊芬;中心支撑钢框架的结构影响系数和位移放大系数研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙亚民;抗震结构非弹性位移估计研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2006年
本文编号:2477578
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2477578.html