搜索引擎“网页快照”服务的著作权侵权相关问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-19 22:47

本文关键词： 网页快照著作权侵权系统缓存避风港默示许可合理使用　出处：《复旦大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“网页快照”技术是在数字化背景下,搜索引擎行业为确保其技术优势、丰富其服务方式、提高互联网用户对网络信息搜集的效率并且降低获取信息成本的一项新技术。“网页快照”的应用提高了互联网用户获取信息的效率、丰富了用户利用信息的途径,从技术的角度来说,对信息在网络环境传播起到了促进作用。但是从著作权法角度来说,互联网海量的信息中有相当一部分是属于享有著作权的数字化作品,“网页快照”技术在自动运行的过程中,直接侵害了这些数字化作品的著作权人的专有权利。对待“网页快照”这一本该中立的新技术的合法性,在国内外理论界和司法实务界都存在着很大的争议。在美国与网页快照有关的判例"Field诉Google"案中,确立了“系统缓存避风港”、“默示许可制度”和“合理使用制度”等网页快照的主要侵权抗辩以及免责事由。本文讨论之重点在于网页快照是否符合这些抗辩和免责事由的适用条件,以及对于诸如“网页快照”等新技术的对著作权制度的冲击,我国著作权法应当如何完善以应对挑战。本文一共分为引言和四个章节。引言介绍了网页快照产生的技术背景和中美关于“网页快照”的一些司法判例,从不同的判决结果中引出本文所要讨论的主题。第一章从网页快照的技术运行背景入手概括了网页快照的特征和技术效果,同时通过与传统搜索引擎服务的技术对比,明确了网页快照在我国著作权法中的定性；第二章在认定网页属于著作权法保护的客体的前提下,认为“网页快照”技术中复制、存储、传播行为构成对权利人复制权、信息网络传播权等著作权专有权利的侵害；第三章探讨“系统缓存避风港”、“默示许可制度”以及“合理使用制度”等著作权的侵权抗辩以及免责事由在网页快照中的适用,认为快照不适用“系统缓存避风港”、“默示许可制度”,可以分情况适用“合理使用制度”对其合法性进行分析；第四章提出网页快照行为的处理原则与我国著作权法合理使用制度的完善。在网络环境下,应将“三步检验标准”的法律地位确定为合理使用一般性判断标准,将其作为一个开放式的原则与著作权法第22条中合理使用行为的列举式立法结合,在涉及诸如“网页快照”等新技术合法性的判断中,给法官预留灵活的自由裁量的空间,这样才能更好平衡著作权人利益与信息技术发展和公共知识新技术传播。
[Abstract]:"Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the digital background, the search engine industry to ensure its technical advantages, enrich its service. A new technology to improve the efficiency of Internet users to collect network information and reduce the cost of obtaining information. The application of "Web Page Snapshot" improves the efficiency of Internet users to obtain information. It enriches the ways for users to use information, and promotes the dissemination of information in the network environment from the technical point of view, but from the perspective of copyright law. A considerable part of the massive information on the Internet belongs to the digital works that enjoy copyright. "Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the process of automatic operation. Direct infringement of the exclusive rights of copyright owners of these digital works. Treatment of "Web Snapshots" The legitimacy of this new technology, which was supposed to be neutral, has been controversial both in theory and judicial practice at home and abroad. In the case of Field v. Google, the United States case relating to web page snapshots, a "safe haven for system caching" was established. "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" and other webpage snapshots of the main tort defences and exemptions. The focus of this discussion is whether the web snapshot meets the applicable conditions of these defences and exemptions. As well as the impact of new technologies such as "web snapshot" on the copyright system, how should China's copyright law be perfected to meet the challenge? This article is divided into introduction and four chapters. The introduction introduces the technical background of web page snapshot and some judicial precedents about "web page snapshot" in China and the United States, and draws the theme of this article from different judgment results. The first chapter summarizes the characteristics and technical effects of web snapshot from the background of the technology operation of web snapshot, and compares with the traditional search engine service technology at the same time. The definition of web page snapshot in the copyright law of our country is clarified. In the second chapter, on the premise that the web page belongs to the object protected by copyright law, the author thinks that the reproduction, storage and dissemination behavior in the technology of "web page snapshot" constitute the right to copy to the obligee. Infringement of exclusive rights of copyright, such as the right of information network dissemination; The third chapter discusses the application of copyright infringement defences such as "system cache safe haven", "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" in the web page snapshot. The author thinks that snapshot is not suitable for "system cache safe haven", "implied license system", and can be applied to "reasonable use system" to analyze its legitimacy. Chapter 4th puts forward the handling principle of web page snapshot and the perfection of the reasonable use system of copyright law in our country. The legal status of the "three-step test standard" should be determined as the general judgment standard of rational use, which should be combined as an open principle with the enumerative legislation of the rational use behavior in Article 22 of the copyright Law. In judgments involving the legitimacy of new technologies such as "web snapshots," judges are given room for flexible discretion. Only in this way can the interests of copyright owners be balanced with the development of information technology and the dissemination of new technology of public knowledge.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】