“垂直搜索”的著作权侵权问题研究——兼评“大众点评网诉爱帮网案”及“携程网诉趣拿网案”

发布时间：2018-04-13 14:15

本文选题：垂直搜索 + 独创性　；参考：《电子知识产权》2009年11期

【摘要】："垂直搜索"将从互联网网页中提取的信息内容存储在自身服务器中向公众提供,引发了著作权侵权问题。在"大众点评网诉爱帮网案"及"携程网诉趣拿网案"两案中,被"垂直搜索"引擎所提取的信息均为用户上传的点评。许多点评未达到"独创性"的要求,因此不构成作品。同时点评的集合也未在选择或编排方面体现出"独创性"。但在被提取的信息构成作品的情况下,"垂直搜索"直接复制并向公众提供信息的实质内容,将替代用户对来源网站的访问。这种行为无法被认定为合理使用,而是对来源网站作品著作权的侵权。"垂直搜索"服务提供者应合理地设计其商业模式,限制搜索结果中显示的作品长度,以避免代替用户对来源网站中作品的访问。
[Abstract]:"Vertical search" stores information extracted from Internet pages in its own servers to the public, causing copyright infringement.In "Dianping net v. Aipan net case" and "Ctrip net v. interest net case", the information extracted by "vertical search" engine are comments uploaded by users.Many reviews do not meet the requirements of originality and therefore do not constitute a work.At the same time, the collection of comments did not reflect "originality" in selection or arrangement.But in the case that the extracted information constitutes a work, "vertical search" directly duplicates and provides the public with the substance of the information, which will replace the user's access to the source website.This act cannot be considered as a reasonable use, but rather an infringement of the copyright of the works of the source website. "The vertical search service provider should reasonably design its business model and limit the length of the work displayed in the search results so as to avoid replacing the user's access to the work in the source site.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：上海市教育委员会曙光计划项目“网络环境下著作权保护国际比较研究”的初期成果
【分类号】：D923.41

【共引文献】