论搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制
发布时间:2018-06-08 19:54
本文选题:搜索引擎 + 侵权 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:搜索引擎技术是近些年来互联网发展中出现的一项新技术,其应用的目的是帮助互联网用户在浩如烟海的信息中快速地找到并显示其所需信息。随着网络信息的飞速增长,搜索引擎已成为现代人上网获取信息的必备工具。本文研究的目的就是想通过法律的手段给搜索引擎创造一个良好的运营环境。 搜索引擎的出现给我们带来了方便快捷的生活,但同时也带来了诸多的社会问题。本文第一章就要介绍搜索引擎的积极功能,及其带来的负面效应。 搜索引擎的积极功能表现在很多方面。首先,搜索引擎促进了信息传播。用户只要通过搜索引擎的用户接口输入关键字,界面上立刻显示出结果,这就是搜索引擎带来的快捷的信息时代,是任何信息传播方式都无法实现的。其次,搜索引擎促进了人际交流。大家可以通过搜索引擎相互交流思想观点、生活理念,从而增加彼此的理解,拉近彼此的关系。另外,搜索引擎还能促进知识积累和社会参与。搜索引擎在收集信息的过程中,实际上也在进行知识筛选、积累。透过搜索引擎“关键词”的搜索,民众还可及时了解社会问题,并积极的参与其中。 随着搜索引擎功能的逐渐强大,它带来的社会问题也日趋严重。民事侵权案件逐年增加,侵犯隐私权和侵犯知识产权的问题严重影响着搜索引擎的运营环境。更严重的是对公共利益的危害,通过搜索引擎加速传播的有害信息严重危害了公共利益。 面对如此严峻的问题,对搜索引擎功能运用加以进一步的法律限制就似乎势在必行,其实,对搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制是有其合理性的。本文的第二章就在于阐释搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制的合理性。 保护私人的合法权利是限制搜索引擎功能运用的合理性的首要所在。在搜索引擎功能运用的各个环节进行合理的限制,适当加重搜索引擎服务提供者的相关义务与责任,断开含有侵犯私人合法权利的信息的传播渠道,侵权纠纷也就无从引发,或者说至少可以大大降低侵权问题发生的可能性。这样侵犯私人合法权利的案件就大大减少,也就很好的保护了私人合法权利。另一方面的合理性表现在对社会秩序的维护。正当的程序是秩序的保障,如果对搜索引擎功能运用的程序做出合理的法律限制,那么有秩序的搜索引擎功能运用环境也就不再是期待。最后,,搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制的合理性是保障权利义务的同一性。对搜索引擎服务提供者设定合理的义务,对搜索引擎功能的运用进行合理的法律限制,是解决目前权利义务失衡问题的唯一办法,是契合权利义务同一性原则的。 既然目前搜索引擎功能的运用带来如此严重的负面效应,并且对其进行法律限制有合理性,那么接下来就要进入实施环节,第三部分就是阐述搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制的原则和方法。搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制是利益平衡原则的要求。只有对搜索引擎功能运用进行合理的法律限制,才能平衡个人之间的利益,平衡个人利益与公共利益。限制搜索引擎功能运用的具体方法要从四个方面考虑,分别是:明确搜索引擎服务提供者的权利义务;强化技术限制;健全隐私权保护立法;保障宪法权利。 通过发现问题,分析问题与解决问题三个环节对搜索引擎功能运用现状的解读,解释了对搜索引擎功能运用进行法律限制的意义。搜索引擎功能运用的法律限制有助于创建一个和谐的搜索引擎功能运营环境,有助于社会的健康发展。
[Abstract]:Search engine technology is a new technology in Internet development in recent years , and its application is to help the internet users find and display the information quickly in the information of the vast sea . With the rapid growth of network information , the search engine has become the necessary tool for the modern people to get information on the Internet . The purpose of this paper is to create a good operating environment for the search engine through the means of law .
The first chapter is about the positive function of the search engine and the negative effect brought by it .
The search engine promotes the communication of information . In addition , the search engine can promote knowledge accumulation and social participation . In addition , the search engine can promote knowledge accumulation and social participation . In addition , the search engine can promote knowledge accumulation and social participation . In addition , the search engine can also promote knowledge accumulation and social participation .
With the development of the function of the search engine , the social problems brought by it are becoming more and more serious . The civil tort cases increase year by year , the infringement of the right to privacy and the infringement of intellectual property seriously affect the operation environment of the search engine . More serious is the harm to the public interest , and the harmful information transmitted through the search engine accelerates the public interest seriously .
In the face of such a serious problem , it seems imperative to apply further legal restrictions on the application of the function of search engine . In fact , it is reasonable to apply the legal limit to the function of search engine . The second chapter of this paper is to explain the rationality of the legal limit of the application of the function of search engine .
The legal right to protect the private rights is the first place to limit the rationality of the application of the function of the search engine . The reasonable restriction is made in every link of the function of the search engine . The legal restriction on the function of the search engine can be greatly reduced and the private legal rights can be greatly reduced . The rationality of the legal restriction on the function of the search engine is not expected . Finally , the rationality of the application of the search engine function is the guarantee of the rights and obligations . Finally , the application of the search engine function is reasonable legal limit , which is the only way to solve the current imbalance of rights and obligations .
Since the present application of search engine function brings such a serious negative effect , and it is reasonable to carry on the legal limitation , the third part is to explain the principles and methods of the application of the function of the search engine . The third part is the requirement of the principle of the balance of interest . Only by applying reasonable legal restrictions on the function of the search engine can balance the interests of the individual and balance the personal interests and the public interest .
Strengthen technical restrictions ;
Sound Privacy Protection Legislation ;
The constitutional right is guaranteed .
By finding out the problems , analyzing the problems and solving the problem , the paper interprets the present situation of the function of the search engine , explains the meaning of the application of the function of the search engine . The legal limitation of the function of the search engine can help to create a harmonious search engine function operating environment , which can help the healthy development of society .
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 于立深;;正确对待政府义务和政府权力[J];长白学刊;2010年05期
2 邹平学;论法的六大基本价值[J];当代法学;2003年08期
3 倪朱亮;;摇摆的利益平衡——以“百度文库”之争为视角[J];法制与社会;2011年16期
4 杨佳;郑海味;;搜索引擎的著作权侵权形式及约束机制探讨[J];法制与社会;2011年33期
5 罗芹;;试论搜索引擎引发的著作权侵权问题[J];法制与社会;2012年12期
6 殷华;;网络搜索引擎侵权的事实认定和法律价值判断[J];人民司法;2010年10期
7 钟诚;罗小凤;;从百度文库搜索引擎侵权事件引发的法律思考——兼论网络侵权的规制[J];上海商学院学报;2011年03期
8 杜敬明;因特网与国家安全[J];网络安全技术与应用;2001年11期
9 孙国华;论法与利益之关系[J];中国法学;1994年04期
本文编号:1996999
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sousuoyinqinglunwen/1996999.html