论中立帮助行为的处罚边界

发布时间：2018-06-10 05:32

本文选题：中立帮助行为 + 帮助犯　；参考：《中国法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：传统理论及司法解释一贯认为,只要行为客观上促进了他人的犯罪,行为人主观上也对此明知,就应作为帮助犯受到处罚。这种不加区别的做法可能导致过于限制公民日常生活中的交易、交往自由。近年来,中立的帮助行为原则上不应作为帮助犯受到处罚已经成为国外刑法理论的主流立场。除非行为人违反违禁品管制等相关规定,否则应认为其中立帮助行为并没有制造不被法所容许的危险,不具有帮助行为性,不成立帮助犯。《刑法修正案(九)》针对网络服务提供者责任的规定,并非意味着全面处罚网络中立帮助行为,相反,除非专门用于实施信息网络犯罪,否则,原则上应将提供互联网接入、服务器托管、网络存储、通讯传输、搜索引擎、软件、链接等技术支持的行为排除在刑罚处罚的范围之外。
[Abstract]:The traditional theory and the judicial explanation have always believed that as long as the behavior objectively promotes the crime of others, the perpetrator should be punished as an accomplice if he knows it subjectively. This indiscriminate approach may lead to excessive restrictions on citizens' freedom of trade and association in their daily lives. In recent years, neutral helping behavior should not be regarded as the main position of foreign criminal law theory. Unless the perpetrator violates relevant regulations, such as the control of contraband goods, he shall be considered that the act of aiding does not create a danger which is not permitted by the law and is not helpful, The provisions on the liability of network service providers under the Criminal Law Amendment (9) do not mean that the act of net neutral assistance is comprehensively punished. On the contrary, unless it is specifically used for the commission of information cybercrime, In principle, the provision of Internet access, server hosting, network storage, communication transmission, search engine, software, links and other technical support should be excluded from the scope of punishment.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：“江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”的成果之一
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】