外语学习者信息素养策略使用的调查
[Abstract]:In today's society, with the rapid development of information and the emergence of the Internet, people are surrounded by different forms of information. Therefore, information literacy has become a basic requirement for many occupations as a kind of location and recognition, and the ability to solve problems effectively in the information society. Eagleton and Roy (2007) have made an empirical study. The QUEST model for processing information process in the network environment, namely, problem, understanding, evaluation, synthesis and conversion strategy, is used as an ideal carrier to measure information of different sources. Based on the QUEST model, the purpose of this study is to explore the use of foreign language learners in the network environment. The use of information literacy strategies. Specifically, this study tries to answer the following three questions: what strategies do 1. English learners often use? Which strategies are used less? 2. whether there is a correlation between the use of the 2. Information Literacy Strategy and the slide score? What is the correlation between the strategy and the score? 3. the high score group and the high score score What are the differences in the use of information literacy strategies among the lower groups? The study selected 57 college students as subjects. They asked to search for information on "sea level rise" on the Internet, and then make a slide of no less than 9 pages on the theme of "sea level rise", and students used the Internet to find, evaluate and synthesize the information needed, The whole process is completed within 150 minutes. According to the "performance evaluation" of Krantz (2003), the slide file scoring standard is made. The scoring standard includes four parts, namely, integrity, language, content and structure. Each part is graded according to "low -1" "medium -2" and "high -3", so the total score of the slide file is from 4 to 12. In addition, a questionnaire based on the QUEST model was also made by the researchers to investigate the usage of the subjects. In order to answer the above questions, four methods were used to collect data. First, the information literacy of the subjects was estimated by their slides. Secondly, the data of the information literacy strategy use was collected by the questionnaire. In addition, the process of collecting information by the subjects was monitored by the software of the My Screen Recorder recording desktop activity as a supplement to the use of information literacy strategies. Finally, after the questionnaire was completed, the corresponding interviews would be carried out to understand the idea of making slides. The results of the use of the strategy can be obtained by analyzing these data. Finally, SPSS 20 is used to analyze these data by describing data, Pearson settlement and single tail analysis. The results show that, first, five strategies are frequently used in the process of locating, evaluating and using information. Specifically, problem policy Second, there is no significant correlation between the information strategy used by the subjects and the total score of their slides, but it has a significant correlation with the score standard neutron score. Specifically, the use of the evaluation strategy and its Zi Celve website is related to the language score. Use evaluation strategies (targeted click URLs and annotated sources) and content points; match a variety of information and research problems with the score of the structure. Finally, the subjects are divided into three groups of high, medium, and low scores based on the total score, integrity, language, content and structure of their slides. There is no obvious difference between the high and low groups in the use of five major categories. However, the difference is obvious when exploring the relationship between the score and the use of the strategy. There are significant differences in language scores between the two groups of new keywords and the change of the search engine to obtain the required information. The use of the translation URL and the domain name and the two groups of information sources are distinctly different in the content score. The operating computer and the two groups of information and research problem matching are distinctly different in the structure score. The significance of the research is to help us better understand information literacy and to further indicate the direction of how to teach Chinese EFL learners' information literacy.
【学位授予单位】:国防科学技术大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 莫新语;;大学生英语学习策略使用变化趋势调查与分析[J];重庆三峡学院学报;2012年01期
2 雷春华;;论二语(外语)学习策略使用的专业差异[J];科教文汇(中旬刊);2013年09期
3 黄清贵;;跨文化交际中的假象——外语学习者交际中Back-channeling策略使用情况及其启示[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
4 杨淑娴;英语写作成功者与不成功者在策略使用上的差异[J];外语界;2002年03期
5 周花平;章晋新;;大学生英语听力高分者与低分者的策略使用研究[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
6 李恬静;王金柱;;影响学生学习策略使用的因素[J];中国成人教育;2009年23期
7 张绪扬;关于智力概念的思考和实验研究[J];心理发展与教育;1989年01期
8 丁朝霞;;本科生在大学英语分级学习中学习策略使用情况调查与研究教法探究[J];校园英语;2012年09期
9 林伟杰;;阅读中学习策略使用的调查与探索[J];黑龙江科技信息;2010年34期
10 孙敏;;中西方面子言语策略使用差异的文化解析[J];海外英语;2012年22期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 毕有余;张向葵;;儿童在编码与提取过程中策略使用的意识性对回忆成绩的影响[A];第十二届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2009年
2 衣新发;林崇德;俞国良;;小学学习不良儿童在电脑问题解决过程中的策略使用[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 江发荣;影响阅读考试策略使用之因素的研究[D];广东外语外贸大学;2006年
2 苗萌岩;外语学习者信息素养策略使用的调查[D];国防科学技术大学;2013年
3 薛志红;大学生英语课堂互动观念和策略使用调查[D];中北大学;2010年
4 李芳娜;壮族大学生英语学习策略使用的调查研究[D];西南大学;2012年
5 杨琳琳;学习者的个体差异对学习策略使用的影响[D];辽宁师范大学;2009年
6 李萍;归因对艺术专业大学生英语学习策略使用的影响[D];西南大学;2010年
7 陈大莲;英语专业学生一外和二外学习策略使用对比研究[D];西南交通大学;2009年
8 买可昂;对防御性悲观策略使用者的应对方式和反思性的研究[D];北京林业大学;2014年
9 张朝霞;维吾尔大学生英语学习策略使用情况调查研究[D];华中师范大学;2009年
10 邵静;时间限制对EFL写作者认知策略和元认知策略使用的影响[D];苏州大学;2012年
,本文编号:2144610
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sousuoyinqinglunwen/2144610.html