当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 临床医学论文 >

中文版自我效能评定量表在社区居住老年人中应用的信效度研究

发布时间:2018-01-05 14:40

  本文关键词:中文版自我效能评定量表在社区居住老年人中应用的信效度研究 出处:《中国全科医学》2017年29期  论文类型:期刊论文


  更多相关文章: 自我效能 社会隔离 老年人 信度 效度


【摘要】:目的翻译并评价预防社会隔离的自我效能评定量表(CSES)在社区居住老年人中应用的信效度。方法 2017年1—4月,采用便利抽样法在辽宁省沈阳市、锦州市、鞍山市、辽阳市、盘锦市、大连市对1 023名符合要求的社区居住老年人发放问卷。采用中文版CSES、中文版社会网络量表(LSNS-6)、一般自我效能感评定量表(GSES)对其进行调查。评价中文版CSES的效度与信度。结果共发放问卷1 023份,回收1 009份,有效问卷982份,有效回收率为96.0%。CSES总分与LSNS-6总分的相关系数为0.79(P0.001);CSES总分与GSES总分的相关系数为0.83(P0.001)。各条目的内容效度指数(CVI)为0.750~1.000,平均CVI值为0.910。主成分分析法抽取2个维度,累积贡献率达67.67%。验证性因子分析显示,拟合指标近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.041,拟合优度指数(GFI)为0.985,调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)为0.972,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.990。平均条目-总分相关系数为0.71,量表总Cronbach'sα系数为0.86,社区网络Cronbach'sα系数为0.84,邻里守望Cronbach'sα系数为0.83,重测信度系数为0.90。结论中文版CSES具有较好的信效度,可用于社区居住老年人预防社会隔离的自我效能评估。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the reliability and validity of CSEs in the elderly living in community. Methods from 2017 to April. Convenience sampling method was used to distribute questionnaires to 1 023 elderly people living in communities in Shenyang, Jinzhou, Anshan, Liaoyang, Panjin and Dalian, Liaoning Province. The Chinese version of CSES was used. Chinese version of social network scale LSNS-6). General Self-efficacy scale (GSES) was used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of CSES. Results 1 023 questionnaires were sent out and 1 009 copies were recovered. The correlation coefficient between the total score of CSES and the total score of LSNS-6 was 0.79 P0.001; The correlation coefficient between the total score of CSES and the total score of GSES was 0.83g P0.0010.The content validity index (CVI) of each item was 0.750 / 1.000. The average CVI value was 0.910. Two dimensions were extracted by principal component analysis (PCA) and the cumulative contribution rate was 67.67.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that. The approximate error of fitting index RMSEAA was 0.041, the index of goodness of fit (GFI) was 0.985, and the adjusted index of goodness of fit (AGFI) was 0.972. The relative fitting index (CFI) was 0.990. The correlation coefficient of the average item-total score was 0.71, and the total Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of the scale was 0.86. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of community network was 0.84, and the Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of neighborhood watch was 0.83. Conclusion the Chinese version of CSES has a good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the self-efficacy of the elderly in community to prevent social isolation.
【作者单位】: 锦州医科大学护理学院;
【基金】:全国高等医学教育科学项目基金(GJHLZ160018)
【分类号】:R473.2
【正文快照】: 社会隔离,即缺乏社交网络,包括与他人的联系和社会支度方面:采用LSNS-6和GSES作为校标关联量表计算相关系持(情感、信息和帮助)不足[1]。老年群体社会隔离的风险数,评估校标效度;内容效度[16]由8名相关领域专家采用4较高,并且社会隔离已被确定为健康状况不佳,幸福感缺失和级评

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 姜岩石;安力彬;王晋荣;袁华;张冉;赵妍妍;;护理人员计算机能力前测量表的信效度研究[J];护理研究;2011年12期

2 邵亚;廖少玲;钟慧琴;卜淑娟;文若兰;;护士工作相关生活质量量表的信效度研究[J];护理学杂志;2014年13期

3 黄春平;刘彦慧;年庆婷;崔颖;;护士结构性授权测评工具中文版信效度研究[J];中华护理杂志;2011年12期



本文编号:1383580

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/1383580.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户99933***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com