一次性密闭式中段尿留取装置的研制与应用

发布时间：2018-04-05 04:14

本文选题：尿标本收集　切入点：一次性设备　出处：《中华护理杂志》2017年09期

【摘要】：目的解决传统中段尿采集杯存在容器易污染、不易持拿且密封性欠佳等问题,降低中段尿标本留取的不合格率。方法选取2016年7月—12月126例未留置导尿管患者为实验组;2017年1月—5月112例未留置导尿管患者为对照组,两组在常规治疗、护理的基础上,实验组应用自行设计制作的一次性密闭式中段尿留取装置收集标本(以下简称中段尿留取装置),对照组采用传统尿杯收集标本。评价两组收集标本不合格率、患者满意率及依从性。结果两组中段尿留取依从性比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.505,P0.001)。两组中段尿留取标本合格率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.115,P=0.024)。实验组和对照组的满意度评分分别为(4.3±0.2)分和(2.8±0.6)分。结论中段尿留取装置能够降低中段尿留取不合格率,提高患者满意率及依从性。
[Abstract]:Objective to solve the problem that containers are easy to be polluted, not easy to hold and sealed in the traditional urine collection cups, and to reduce the unqualified rate of urine samples collected in the middle section.Methods from July to December 2016, 126 patients without indwelling urethral catheter were selected as experimental group and 112 patients without indwelling catheter as control group from January to May 2017.In the experimental group, the specimen was collected with a single closed middle segment urine retention device (hereinafter referred to as the middle segment urine retention device), while the control group was collected with the traditional urine cup.The rate of nonconformity, satisfaction and compliance of the two groups were evaluated.Results there was a significant difference in compliance between the two groups (蠂 ~ 2 = 16.505U, P 0.001).There was significant difference between the two groups in the qualified rate of urine samples (蠂 2 = 5.115, P 0.024).The satisfaction scores of the experimental group and the control group were 4.3 卤0.2 and 2.8 卤0.6, respectively.Conclusion the mid-segment urine retention device can reduce the non-qualified rate of mid-segment urine retention and improve the satisfaction rate and compliance of the patients.
【作者单位】：连云港市第一人民医院泌尿外科;南通医科大学临床医学院;
【分类号】：R472

【相似文献】