新型毒品成瘾者在不同情境下的决策特点

发布时间：2018-06-10 20:38

  本文选题：甲卡西酮成瘾 + 冰毒成瘾　； 参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:探讨甲卡西酮成瘾者和冰毒成瘾者的决策特点。方法:从某强制隔离戒毒所筛选出甲卡西酮成瘾者45人,冰毒成瘾者41人,从某大学后勤工作人员中招募对照组被试33人,分别使用冲动性量表(BIS-11)、杯子任务研究被试的冲动性水平和决策特点。结果:冰毒成瘾组的冲动性显著高于对照组和甲卡西酮成瘾组;在收益情境下,甲卡西酮成瘾组和冰毒成瘾组选择风险选项的比例显著高于对照组,甲卡西酮成瘾组和对照组比冰毒成瘾组选择更多的适应性选项;在损失情境下,三组被试选择风险选项和适应性选项的比例不存在显著差异。结论:在收益情境下,成瘾组比对照表现出更明显的风险决策偏好,只有冰毒成瘾组表现出非适应性决策。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the decision-making characteristics of methamphetamine addicts and meth addicts. Methods: a total of 45 methicarone addicts and 41 methamphetamine addicts were selected from a compulsory isolation drug treatment center, and 33 control subjects were recruited from the logistics staff of a university. Impulse scale (BIS-11) was used to study the impulse level and decision-making characteristics of the subjects. Results: the impulsiveness of methamphetamine addiction group was significantly higher than that of control group and megasone addiction group, and the proportion of choice of risk options in methamphetamine addiction group and meth addiction group was significantly higher than that in control group. Compared with meth addiction group, Mecca addiction group and control group chose more adaptive options, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of risk option and adaptive option between the three groups under the situation of loss. Conclusion: in the income situation, the addiction group showed a more obvious risk decision preference than the control group, and only the meth addiction group showed a non-adaptive decision.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;中国政法大学社会学院;长治大辛庄强制隔离戒毒所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(15BSH085) 北京市社会科学基金一般项目(15SHB019);北京市社会科学基金一般项目(14JYB018) 中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目;中国政法大学重点学科应用心理学;中国政法大学博士创新实践项目(2016BSCX17)资助
【分类号】：R749.64
，

本文编号：2004532