围手术期患者压疮评估及评估工具使用现状的调查研究

发布时间：2018-07-26 19:58

【摘要】：目的调查手术患者不同阶段压疮风险评估方法及评估工具使用情况。方法使用自行设计的调查问卷,对江苏省7所医院外科和手术室护士共210名进行调查。结果 7所医院手术室护士使用不同的压疮风险评估表进行手术压疮风险评估,手术不同阶段使用同一张评估表评估,评估频次(1~3次)和评估时间(术前访视到术后病房交接)各不相同;外科护士均使用Braden评估表评估患者压疮风险,认为术后评估需考虑术中因素,目前使用的评估表缺少针对性评估内容。结论目前围手术期患者压疮风险评估的频次、时间点不规范,评估内容局限且缺少针对性,整个围手术期压疮评估无连续性和动态性,缺乏术前、术中、术后专用的压疮风险评估表。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the risk assessment methods and evaluation tools of pressure sore in different stages of operation. Methods 210 nurses in surgery and operating room in 7 hospitals in Jiangsu province were investigated with self-designed questionnaire. Results the nurses of operating room in 7 hospitals used different risk assessment forms to evaluate the risk of pressure sore in operation, and the same assessment table was used in different stages of operation. The frequency of evaluation (1 / 3) and the time of assessment (from preoperative visit to postoperative ward handover) were different. The surgical nurses used Braden assessment form to evaluate the risk of pressure sore, and considered that intraoperative factors should be taken into account in postoperative evaluation. The assessment forms currently in use lack targeted evaluation content. Conclusion at present, the risk assessment of pressure sore in perioperative patients is not standardized, the content of evaluation is limited and lack of pertinence, the evaluation of pressure sore during the whole perioperative period is not continuous and dynamic, and it lacks of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation. Post-operative pressure sore risk assessment table.
【作者单位】：江苏大学医学院;江苏大学附属医院慢性伤口中心;江苏大学附属医院手术室;镇江市第一人民医院手术室;
【基金】：江苏省2014年度研究生教育教学改革研究与实践课题(JGLX14_088) 江苏省2016年普通高校专业学位研究生实践创新计划项目(SJZZ16_0201)
【分类号】：R473

【相似文献】