便携式手臂托架的设计及其在PICC置管中的应用

发布时间：2018-08-23 20:10

【摘要】：目的验证便携式手臂托架在PICC置管中应用的效果。方法选取2016年8月—11月PICC置管患者98例作为实验组,使用便携式手臂托架进行PICC置管;2016年4月—7月PICC置管患者82例作为对照组,使用简易木板进行PICC置管,评价两组置管时的舒适度、置管成功率、多次进针和送导丝例数、并发症发生情况。结果实验组1级舒适度高于对照组,实验组2、3、4级舒适度均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。实验组的置管成功率(98.0%)高于对照组(93.9%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.31)。实验组多次进针和送导丝的例数比对照组少,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。实验组3例(3.1%)出现并发症,对照组6例(7.3%)出现并发症。结论便携式手臂托架的托举和抬高功能提高了置管舒适度和置管成功率,减少并发症发生。
[Abstract]:Objective to verify the effect of portable arm bracket in PICC tube placement. Methods from August to November 2016, 98 patients with PICC tube were selected as experimental group, and 82 patients with PICC tube placed by PICC from April to July 2016 as control group, and 82 patients with PICC tube were placed PICC tube with simple plank from April to July 2016. The degree of comfort, the success rate of tube placement, the number of cases of multiple needle and wire feeding, and the occurrence of complications were evaluated in the two groups. Results the first degree of comfort of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and that of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P0.001). The success rate of tube placement in the experimental group (98.0%) was higher than that in the control group (93.9%), but there was no significant difference (P0. 31). The cases of multiple needle feeding and wire feeding in the experimental group were less than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Complications occurred in 3 cases (3.1%) in the experimental group and in 6 cases (7.3%) in the control group. Conclusion the lifting and raising function of portable arm bracket can improve the comfort and success rate of tube insertion and reduce the incidence of complications.
【作者单位】：上海中医药大学附属普陀医院呼吸科;
【基金】：上海市普陀区卫生管理课题项目(2016PTGL17)
【分类号】：R472

【相似文献】