糖尿病教育者培训效果及其影响因素的调查研究

发布时间：2019-03-21 18:23

【摘要】：目的对我国糖尿病教育者培训后的效果进行调查,并分析其影响因素,旨在为完善糖尿病教育者的考核认证模式提供依据。方法选择2008年—2014年参加糖尿病学院培训并通过考核的314名糖尿病教育者,采用自行设计的培训考核表进行调查。结果考核总分为(76.64±22.24)分,得分最高的前3个项目为开展护士培训(93.36±62.81)分,健康教育形式(84.27±23.09)分和教育者工作职责及流程(82.07±32.43)分,60分的项目依次为随访管理(56.16±31.74)分,发表论文(38.47±47.75)分和参与科研(26.11±44.00)分。多元线性回归分析发现糖尿病专科工作年限(t=3.515,P=0.001)、是否在糖尿病教育者岗位工作(t=3.404,P=0.001)和是否为一线医务工作者(t=-2.589,P=0.001)是考核成绩的影响因素。结论糖尿病教育者常规教育工作得分较高,科研相关工作得分较低;糖尿病专科工作时间长、在糖尿病教育者岗位工作和非一线医务工作者的考核得分较高。
[Abstract]:Aim to investigate the effect of diabetic educators training in China and analyze its influencing factors in order to provide evidence for improving the assessment and certification model of diabetic educators. Methods 314 diabetic educators from 2008 to 2014 who had been trained and tested in Diabetes Institute were investigated by self-designed training examination form. Results the total score was (76.64 卤22.24), the first three items with the highest score were (93.36 卤62.81), (84.27 卤23.09), (82.07 卤32.43), and (82.07 卤32.43), respectively. The items with 60 scores were (56.16 卤31.74) in follow-up management, (38.47 卤47.75) in published papers and (26.11 卤44.00) in scientific research. Multivariate linear regression analysis found that diabetes specialist years (t = 3.515, P < 0.001), whether to work in a diabetic educator position (t / a 3.404, P < 0.001) and whether to be a first-line medical worker (t / a 2.5899, P = 0.001) were found. P < 0. 001) is the influencing factor of the assessment results. Conclusion Diabetic educators have higher scores in routine education, lower scores in scientific research related work, longer working hours in diabetes specialties and higher scores in post work and non-first-line medical workers in diabetic educators.
【作者单位】：四川大学华西医院内分泌代谢科;北京大学第一医院内分泌代谢科;东南大学医学院附属中大医院内分泌代谢科;中日友好医院内分泌代谢科;南京中医药大学附属江苏省中西医结合医院健康教育中心;北京大学人民医院内分泌代谢科;北京清华医院内分泌科;中南大学附属湘雅医院护理部;
【分类号】：R473.5

【相似文献】