再思族群:基于田野与阅读的启发

发布时间：2018-03-03 23:11

本文选题：族群　切入点：原生论　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：人类学对于族群的研究,历来被分为"原生论"与"建构论"两派。卡马洛夫(John L.Comaroff)提出将族群视为分类的观点,超越了原生论与建构论的二分,为理解族群问题提供了新的视角。在梳理并评述卡马洛夫观点的基础上,本文试图呈现一个反向的案例,即云南迪庆藏族自治州。在这里,族群并没有成为人与人之间首要的分类体系,多个族群在地域的基础上结合为了相互联结的共同体。迪庆的案例,促使我们重新思考"族群"与"民族"概念,并寻找在民族地区从事研究的新方法。笔者认为,费孝通先生当年提倡的社区研究,在今天的民族地区或许仍旧大有可为。
[Abstract]:Anthropology's study of ethnic groups has always been divided into two schools: "nativism" and "constructivism". The author, John L. Comaroff, puts forward the idea that ethnic groups are regarded as categories, which transcends the dichotomy between primordialism and constructivism. On the basis of combing and commenting on Kamarov's viewpoint, this paper attempts to present a reverse case, namely Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan. Ethnic groups have not become the primary system of classification between people. Many ethnic groups have been combined on a geographical basis to form an interconnected community. Diqing's case has prompted us to rethink the concepts of "ethnic group" and "nation". The author thinks that the community study advocated by Mr. Fei Xiaotong at that time may still be promising in the minority areas today.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学人类学研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“西部地区城镇化进程中的文化格局变迁:‘藏彝走廊’多个地点的历史、人文区位学考察”(14JJD840005)阶段性成果
【分类号】：C912.4

【相似文献】