从语言对文化的意义观“族群边缘论”的神话——对王明珂《华夏边缘》的辩驳

发布时间：2019-04-10 18:15

【摘要】：结构主义或后结构主义的出现似乎渗透了社会/文化人类学所有的方法论和研究范式,社会/文化人类学从二元对立观到二元融合的兼容并蓄成为真正意义上的多元学科。尤其在心理学、认知理论等后结构主义流派出现后,语言、文本、历史对文化之研究变得更加复杂和多维。以王明珂著《华夏边缘—历史记忆与族群认同》一书的学术脉络和研究范式——"透过边缘见‘中心’"来看,其学术思想无不受到后结构主义的严重影响。因此,考察其试图运用二元对立与兼容史观来构架一个有着客观和历史文化特征、主观认同、相互指认并跨越边界、以"华夏"和"异族"千年互动庞大案例为叙事主体的"概念化族群"研究,一定要放在后结构主义方法论之下才可能从根源上去理解和释疑,并藉以辩驳一个没有"中心"意涵的"族群"和没有结论的"民族史族群边缘理论",其实只是一个历史先验论的神话。
[Abstract]:The emergence of structuralism or post-structuralism seems to permeate all the methodologies and research paradigms of social / cultural anthropology. The compatibility of social / cultural anthropology from dualistic opposites to dualistic integration has become a multi-discipline in the true sense. Especially after the emergence of post-structuralism schools such as psychology, cognitive theory and so on, the study of culture in language, text and history becomes more complex and multidimensional. According to the academic context and research paradigm of Wang Mingke's book "the Edge of China-Historical memory and ethnic identity"-"through the Center of marginal View", his academic thought has been seriously influenced by post-structuralism. Therefore, it tries to use dualistic opposites and compatible views of history to construct a framework with objective and historical and cultural characteristics, subjective identity, mutual identification and cross-border. The study of the "conceptualized ethnic group", which is based on the case of the thousands of years of interaction between "Huaxia" and "Alien", must be put under the methodology of post-structuralism before it can be understood and explained from the root causes. In fact, it is only a myth of historical transcendental theory to argue against a "ethnic group" without "center" meaning and "the marginal theory of ethnic historical group" which has no conclusion.
【作者单位】：云南财经大学;
【基金】：2010年度国家社会科学基金一般课题“西部苗族的历史迁徙及族群记忆研究”(10BMZ009)中期成果之一
【分类号】：C95

【相似文献】