SF-36应用于中国期刊编辑人员健康评价的信度和效度研究

发布时间：2018-01-05 00:12

  本文关键词：SF-36应用于中国期刊编辑人员健康评价的信度和效度研究　出处：《韶关学院学报》2016年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 编辑 健康评价 SF-量表 信度 效度

【摘要】：评价SF-36量表在测量中国期刊编辑人员健康中的信度和效度,为编辑人群选择适宜的健康测量工具并进行人群间的健康比较提供科学依据.采用整群抽样的方法抽随机取全国200家期刊编辑部1 200名编辑人员进行测试.结果表明:SF-36的Cronbach'sα系数为0.905,生理、心理两个子量表的总Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.846、0.888;8个维度的Cronbach'sα系数均大于0.77.两个分半量表的Spearman-Brown分半信度为0.768;效度分析中,各维度分与所属子量表分的相关系数均较大.因子分析提取出8个因子,累积贡献率为66.38%;旋转后各因子载荷与量表的设计结构基本吻合.因此,SF-36量表在测试中具有较好的信度和效度,适于评价编辑人群的健康状况.
[Abstract]:To evaluate the reliability and validity of SF-36 scale in measuring the health of Chinese periodical editors. To provide scientific basis for editing population to select suitable health measurement tools and to compare the health among people. Random sampling of 200 Journals editorial boards in China by Cluster sampling. The results showed that the Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of 1: SF-36 was 0.905. The total Cronbach's 伪 coefficients of physiological and psychological subscales were 0.846 and 0.888 respectively. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficients of the eight dimensions were all greater than 0.77.The Spearman-Brown split-half reliability of the two split-half scales was 0.768; In the validity analysis, the correlation coefficients between each dimension score and the sub-scale score were higher. Eight factors were extracted by factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 66.38%. Therefore, the SF-36 scale has good reliability and validity in the test, and is suitable for evaluating the health status of the editorial population.
【作者单位】： 南方医科大学学报编辑部;南方医科大学护理学院;
【基金】：广东省科技计划项目(2016A030303010) 南方医科大学青年科技人员培育项目(RW2015PY04) 广东省高校学报研究会项目(2014201)
【分类号】：G238
【正文快照】： 期刊编辑人员的健康问题是影响期刊发展的重要因素.编辑人员有自己独特的思维方式、生活方式、工作方式和行为方式,如长时间伏案工作,因此他们的心身健康也有非常明显的职业特点,如强迫症状、胃炎、十二指肠溃疡、神经性头痛、神经衰弱、腰椎尖盘突出、颈肩关节病、痔疮等[1-3，

本文编号：1380717