论非法作品的著作权保护

发布时间：2018-02-27 13:29

本文关键词： 非法作品权利范围程序违法性作品内容违法性作品侵权救济　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：从中美知识产权争端开始,非法作品的保护问题逐渐引起知识产权学界的关注,2010年2月26日对《著作权法》第四条第一款进行了修改,非法作品更是成为学界的焦点问题。本文主要是对非法作品的分类标准、其权利范围和非法作品受到侵权时如何进行救济,加以研究和探讨,以期对司法实践提供一些切实可行的建议。导言部分,笔者认为非法作品应该分为两种类型,即程序违法性作品和内容违法性作品。同时本文指出,这两类非法作品的分类依据主要是根据司法实践和现行《著作权法》第四条的规定,而对非法作品进行的分类。并且本文指出这两种非法作品中存在着诸如作品分类不明确、权利范围不清晰以及侵权救济不确定等等方面的问题。第一章为“非法作品的类型及其分类标准”。依据司法实践中的典型例子和现行《著作权法》第四条,可以将非法作品分为程序违法性作品以及内容违法性作品两种类型。对于程序违法性作品而言,它们的相同之处是在出版、传播该类作品的过程中违反了国家的出版监管法规的有关规定。而对于内容违法性作品,它们又可以进一步细分。第二章为“对非法作品的权利范围的界定”。程序违法性作品的著作权人不但享有消极的专有权利而且享有今后通过合法方式利用、传播作品的自由。因为该类作品在出版和传播的过程中,仅仅是违反了国家的出版监管法规,而出版监管法规并不能否定著作权人享有的消极的专有权利以及利用、传播作品的自由。而对于内容违法性作品的著作权人而言,他们仅仅享有消极的专有权利,而不能享有利用、传播作品的自由。第三章为“对非法作品的侵权救济”。法院在进行司法审判之前,必须对涉案作品进行审查,审查其作品的内容是否违反宪法和法律、损害公共利益,对涉案作品进行内容审查是司法审判过程中的一个前置性条件,一个必不可少的关键性环节。对于程序违法性作品而言,当其受到侵权损害时,其著作权人不仅可以请求侵权人停止侵权,而且可以请求侵权人要求获得赔偿损失。对在我国传播的未经批准的涉外影视作品进行司法审判时,首先要进行内容审查,审查其内容中是否含有违反宪法和法律、损害公共利益的成分。而对于违反宪法和法律、损害公共利益的作品而言,其著作权人虽然可以请求侵权人停止侵权,但并不能因此而要求获得损害赔偿。第四章是结论部分,笔者对全文进行了概述性的总结。再次强调了对两类非法作品的权利范围的界定和它们遭受侵权时可能获得的救济方式。
[Abstract]:From the beginning of Sino US intellectual property rights disputes, protection of intellectual property rights of the illegal works gradually aroused the concern of academics, February 26, 2010 on "the copyright law > the first paragraph of article fourth was amended, illegal work is to become the focus of academic circles. This paper is mainly about the classification standard of illegal works, how to carry out the scope of rights and remedies the illegal infringement of works, to study and discuss, in order to provide some practical suggestions for the judicial practice.
The introduction part, the author thinks that the illegal works should be divided into two types, namely the illegal procedure of work and illegal works. At the same time, this paper points out that, according to the classification of these two types of illegal works are mainly based on the judicial practice and the current "Copyright Law shall > Fourth, and the classification of the illegal works and this paper. Pointed out that the two kinds of illegal works such as the existence of work classification is not clear, the scope of rights is not clear and tort relief is uncertain problems.
The first chapter is "the types of illegal works and classification standards. Based on typical examples in judicial practice and the current" Copyright Law > Fourth, can be divided into procedural illegality of illegal works and works of the two types of illegal works. For illegal procedure of works, and their similarities in publishing, the process of communication work in violation of the relevant provisions of the state publishing regulatory. As for the content of illegal works, they can be further subdivided.
The second chapter is "the rights of the illegal works. The scope of illegal procedure of the copyright of the works of people not only enjoy the exclusive rights and enjoy the future through the legal way using the works. Because of this kind of works in the publishing and dissemination process, is only in violation of state regulations and publishing. Publishing regulations does not negate the copyright owner has the exclusive right to use and negative, the works. As for the content of illegal copyright people, they just enjoy the exclusive rights, and can not enjoy the use of the works.
The third chapter is "the judicial relief of illegal works. Before the court of justice, must examine the work involved, whether to review its work in violation of the Constitution and the law, damage the public interests, are involved in the work of censorship as a pre condition of judicial process, a key link essential. Procedures for illegal works, when the infringement damage, the copyright owner can request the infringer to stop the infringement, and may request the infringer to claim damages. The judicial trial in China spread without the approval of the foreign film and television works, the first to censorship whether the review of its content contained in violation of the Constitution and the law, damage the public interests of the components. To violate the Constitution and laws and damage the public interests of the works, the copyright owner can The infringer shall be requested to stop the infringement, but it can not therefore claim damages.
The fourth chapter is the conclusion. The author summarizes the whole article. It emphasizes the definition of the two categories of illegal works and the way of relief they may receive when they are infringed.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】