当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 出版论文 >

论我国表达自由与著作权的关系及其协调

发布时间:2018-03-09 08:45

  本文选题:表达自由 切入点:著作权 出处:《安徽师范大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:在我国,随着现代科学技术的不断进步,作为宪法学领域概念的表达自由与作为民法学领域概念的著作权发生着越来越多的联系。虽然《中华人民共和国宪法》将表达自由这一基本人权用“言论、出版、结社、集会、游行、示威的自由”、“提出批评和建议的权利”、“申诉、控告或者检举的权利”等形式表现了出来,赋予了其至高无上的地位,但在现实中,,作为财产权的著作权却屡屡对作为基本人权和宪法性权利的表达自由发生着冲击和侵蚀。 如何正确认识表达自由与著作权的关系,如何妥善处理两者之间的冲突,是目前亟待解决的问题。对于此问题,当前学界研究甚少,国际上也缺乏完善的制度参考。要真正解决好这个问题,需要从以下方面着手:首先,应明晰有关表达自由与著作权的基础理论,尤其是价值理论,为正确处理两者关系在理念上树立参照系。其次,结合我国的相关法律规定,通过构建行为模式的观察视角,对表达自由与著作权的行为进行对应分析,并通过分类的方式,对两者的关系进行梳理,进而分为相容关系与冲突关系,再依据更加具体的原因,对相容关系和冲突关系作出进一步细分。最后,以价值理念为导向,对表达自由与著作权的冲突关系提出了协调规则,从对著作权保护进行宪法审查、通过设立第三方帮助机构明确对技术措施的限制、禁止标准合同规避著作权的限制及例外、扩大著作权的合理使用范围、缩短著作权的保护期限这五个方面来对表达自由与著作权的冲突关系进行协调。相信在正确理念的引导下,建立的一系列规则,有助于我国形成更为顺达、畅通的表达环境,而这不仅是实现表达自由的途径,同时也是著作权价值的真正回归。
[Abstract]:In China, with the continuous progress of modern science and technology, Freedom of expression, as a concept in the field of constitutional law, is increasingly linked to copyright as a concept in the field of civil law. Although the Constitution of the people's Republic of China uses freedom of expression as a fundamental human right, "speech, publication, association and assembly, The freedom to march and demonstrate, "the right to criticize and make suggestions," and "the right to complain, sue, or report," and other forms have given it a supreme status, but in reality, Copyright, as a property right, often impacts and erodes the freedom of expression as a basic human right and a constitutional right. How to correctly understand the relationship between freedom of expression and copyright, and how to properly handle the conflict between them, is a problem to be solved. In order to really solve this problem, we need to start from the following aspects: first, we should clarify the basic theory of freedom of expression and copyright, especially the theory of value. In order to correctly deal with the relationship between the two in the concept of establishing a reference system. Secondly, combined with the relevant laws and regulations of our country, through the construction of the behavior model of the observation perspective, the freedom of expression and copyright behavior of the corresponding analysis, and through the way of classification, Combing the relationship between the two, and then divided into compatible relationship and conflict relationship, and then according to more specific reasons, to make a further subdivision of the compatibility relationship and conflict relationship. This paper puts forward the coordination rules for the conflict between freedom of expression and copyright, including the constitutional review of copyright protection, the establishment of third-party help agencies to clarify the restrictions on technical measures, and the prohibition of standard contracts from circumventing the restrictions and exceptions of copyright. In order to coordinate the conflict between freedom of expression and copyright, we should expand the scope of fair use of copyright and shorten the duration of copyright protection. I believe that under the guidance of correct ideas, a series of rules will be established. It is helpful for our country to form a more smooth and unimpeded expression environment, which is not only a way to realize freedom of expression, but also a true return of copyright value.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 宋慧献;;财产权多元论与知识产权的非人权性[J];北方法学;2011年03期

2 吴汉东;李瑞登;;中国知识产权法学研究30年[J];法商研究;2010年03期

3 张岳峰;;作品的社会属性是作品的本质属性[J];河北学刊;2010年05期

4 刘莘,金石;政府对新闻自由管制标准管窥[J];行政法学研究;2004年03期

5 杜承铭;论表达自由[J];中国法学;2001年03期

6 宋慧献;;利益分配的工具:版权制度的价值论分析[J];知识产权;2009年03期

7 吴汉东;;知识产权的多元属性及研究范式[J];中国社会科学;2011年05期

8 樊百乐;;以真相为唯一出发点[J];中国报道;2011年11期



本文编号:1587811

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/1587811.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3076d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com