一起著作权侵权案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-03-21 05:59

本文选题：著作权　切入点：恶意诉讼　出处：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：当今社会中,以著作权遭受侵害而提起的诉讼屡见不鲜,而其中的一些不乏是披着诉讼的合法外衣实现非诉讼目的的民事恶意诉讼。目前我国与之相应的法律体系的框架和配套措施尚未出炉,学界对民事恶意诉讼的很多基础性问题还存在很多分歧,如对“恶意”如何界定、实践中应该如何认定和规制等。对民事恶意诉讼问题进行更深入、细致、系统的研究,有助于保护著作权人的权力和利益,同时对完善我国的民事诉讼体系有着积极的现实意义。本文采用案例研究的方法,对引发了广泛争议的华盖公司诉重庆二公司侵权案进行分析,详细分析案件所涵盖的具体信息以及案件的审理涉及的法律问题。恶意诉讼是指行为人为了追求不法、不当利益或其他非法目的,在缺乏合理的法律事实和理由的情况下,违反诉讼目的并基于故意而行使法律所赋予的各项诉讼权利,采取虚构事实、隐瞒真相的方法提起诉讼,侵犯相对人的合法权利,给相对人造成财产及精神方面损害的诉讼。通过阐述恶意诉讼的概念,构成要件,本文着重对案例中的主要争议进行分析,进而判断本案中原告的诉讼是否构成了恶意诉讼。从案例到法律规定,从法规到司法实践,案件审理中出现的问题以及社会舆论对案件的争议,折射出了我国现行法律对于恶意诉讼的认定以及如何更好地保护著作权方面存在一定的问题。我国现行法律中缺乏关于恶意诉讼的相关规定,没有定义,制裁规定不够清楚,致使关于恶意诉讼的争议不断。著作权维权诉讼成本较高,诉讼费用没有包括因为诉讼而付出的合理费用,严重地影响了权利人通过诉讼的方式进行维权。本文主要对以上问题进行了分析思索,通过对一些国家在法律方面对恶意诉讼和著作权保护相关问题应对做法的借鉴,提出了如何加强著作权保护和完善方面的几点建议。在法律上逐步明确恶意诉讼的定义以及与之对应的侵权损害赔偿制度,构建合理确定诉讼费负担制度以及在赔偿数额的确定上充分体现权利人利益全面维护原则可以减轻权利人维权的诉讼成本能够更有效地保障和维护著作权人的权力和利益,促进著作物及其相关事业地健康发展。
[Abstract]:In today's society, lawsuits brought against copyright infringement are common. And some of them are civil malicious litigation in the legal guise of litigation for non-litigation purposes. At present, the framework and supporting measures of the corresponding legal system in our country have not yet been published. There are still many differences in academic circles on many basic issues of civil malicious litigation, such as how to define "malice", how to identify and regulate it in practice, and so on. It is helpful to protect the rights and interests of copyright owners, and has positive practical significance to perfect the civil litigation system of our country. In this paper, the case study is used to analyze the infringement case of Huagai Company v. Chongqing No. 2 Company, which has caused widespread controversy. A detailed analysis of the specific information covered by the case and the legal issues involved in the trial of the case. Malicious litigation refers to the perpetrator's lack of reasonable legal facts and reasons for the pursuit of lawlessness, improper interests or other unlawful purposes, In violation of the purpose of the proceedings and on the basis of intent to exercise all the procedural rights conferred by the law, to institute a lawsuit by means of fictitious facts and to conceal the truth, thereby infringing the legitimate rights of the opposite party, By expounding the concept and elements of malicious litigation, this paper focuses on the analysis of the main disputes in the case, and then determines whether the plaintiff's action constitutes malicious litigation in this case. From cases to legal provisions, from laws and regulations to judicial practice, problems arising in the trial of cases and disputes over cases by public opinion, This reflects that there are certain problems in the identification of malicious litigation and how to better protect copyright in the current law of our country. There are no relevant provisions on malicious litigation in our current law, no definition, and no clear sanctions. The costs of copyright litigation are high, and the costs of litigation do not include the reasonable costs incurred as a result of the litigation. This paper mainly analyzes and ponders the above problems, through the legal aspects of some countries to malicious litigation and copyright protection related issues to learn from the practice. Some suggestions on how to strengthen the protection and perfection of copyright are put forward. In law, the definition of malicious lawsuit and the corresponding system of compensation for infringement damage are clarified step by step. To establish a reasonable system of determining the burden of litigation costs and to fully reflect the principle of full maintenance of the interests of the obligee in determining the amount of compensation can reduce the litigation costs of the right holders to protect and protect the rights and interests of the copyright owners more effectively. To promote the healthy development of works and related undertakings.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】