我国学术期刊评价体系服务期刊发展刍议

发布时间：2018-03-22 08:13

本文选题：学术期刊　切入点：期刊评价体系　出处：《出版科学》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过梳理我国9个期刊数据库,研究其对我国科技期刊发展所产生的影响。结果表明,9个数据库之间相对独立,数据样本差距较大,数据遴选方法和评价结果有一定差异,其学术导向性有待商榷。结果还显示,我国学术期刊评价体系中存在一些评价指标滞后于学术期刊发展的情况,如载文量、基金论文比等指标权重过大等,评价活动被扭曲等功能异化问题逐渐显现。通过分析现有期刊评价体系中存在的问题和风险,如"市场"目的性较强、利用学术期刊评价结果来"操刀"学术评价过程等,对我国期刊评价体系提出一些建议和意见,以期对优化我国学术期刊评价体系有所借鉴,推动学术期刊健康、有序地发展。
[Abstract]:By combing 9 periodical databases in China and studying their influence on the development of sci-tech periodicals in China, the results show that the 9 databases are relatively independent, the data sample gap is large, and the data selection methods and evaluation results are different to a certain extent. The results also show that some evaluation indexes lag behind the development of academic journals in the evaluation system of academic journals in China, such as the amount of papers published, the weight of fund papers and so on. By analyzing the problems and risks existing in the existing periodical evaluation system, such as "market" with a strong purpose, the evaluation results of academic journals are used to "manipulate" the academic evaluation process, etc. This paper puts forward some suggestions and suggestions on the evaluation system of Chinese journals in order to optimize the evaluation system of Chinese academic journals and promote the healthy and orderly development of academic journals.
【作者单位】：《武汉交通职业学院学报》编辑部;《国际煤炭科学技术学报(英文版)》编辑部;《岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)》编辑部;
【基金】：2016年全国高等学校文科学报研究会立项项目(ZC08)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：G237.5

【相似文献】