著作权法上的收回权制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-23 04:05

本文选题：收回权　切入点：经济　出处：《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 著作权法上的收回权是指权利人在特定条件下,收回已经发表的作品,禁止他人复制发行其已经表示收回的作品的权利。广义的收回权包括三种类型:因不作为而引起的收回权,因观点改变、内容错误而引起的收回权,特定时间点的收回权。该制度主要存在于法国、德国、意大利等以保护作者精神权利为主的大陆法系国家,并被越来越多的国家和地区所接受和引入。但是,由于收回权本身的特殊性以及该权利的运行对市场交易秩序的冲击性,它从存在之初就存在着广泛的争议,而且对于其合理性和可行性的争议也从来没有停止过。我国《著作权法》未规定收回权制度。因此,长期以来,所看到的仅限于收回权制度的基本概念的介绍,而没有对各国相关制度及其理论和实践的深入了解和研究。但随着知识经济时代的到来,如何通过法律保护对知识产品的创造者提供顺应时代的充分保护就成为一个重要课题。收回权作为对作者提供高水平保护的权利,在这一时期就有了较高的研究价值。因此,本文拟通过对该权利相关知识的初步研究及探讨,以促进人们对著作权中收回权制度的认识和保护。本文共分为四部分。第一部分,收回权的总体介绍。在这一部分内容中,笔者通过对收回权广义、狭义概念,收回权的法律特征,收回权行使的一般条件以及收回权性质的介绍,使读者对该权利的整体面貌有个较为清晰地认识。第二部分,收回权的分类。在这部分中主要借鉴了各国比较成功的立法经验,根据收回权的三种类型的特征进行了较为详细的解构和分析。第三部分,收回权的理论分析。这一部分作为本文的重点,从经济、文化、法律这三个角度出发,说明了收回权制度存在的价值和意义,并就收回权制度目前在学界中所存在的论争的焦点问题提出了笔者的看法。该部分实际上是对学界中关于收回权存在的合理性和实践中的可行性的论证。第四部分,我国收回权制度的构建。笔者根据我国的法治现状同时借鉴外国的立法经验,就我国制定收回权制度提出了初步的立法构想。
[Abstract]:The right of restitution in copyright law refers to the right holder to recover his published work under certain conditions, The right to prohibit others from reproducing or distributing a work that they have indicated to be recovered. The broad right of restitution consists of three types: the right to retract due to omission, the right to retract due to a change of opinion, and the right to recover due to erroneous content, The system mainly exists in France, Germany, Italy and other civil law countries which mainly protect the spiritual rights of authors, and is accepted and introduced by more and more countries and regions. Due to the particularity of the right and the impact of its operation on the order of market transactions, there have been extensive disputes since the beginning of its existence, and the dispute on its rationality and feasibility has never stopped. The copyright Law of our country does not provide for the system of the right of restitution. Therefore, for a long time, what we have seen is only the introduction of the basic concepts of the system of the right of restitution. However, with the advent of the era of knowledge economy, there has been no in-depth understanding and study of the relevant institutions and their theories and practices in various countries. How to protect the creators of knowledge products by law becomes an important subject. As the right to provide high level of protection to the authors, the right of recovery has higher research value in this period. This paper intends to promote the understanding and protection of the system of the right of recovery in copyright through the preliminary study and discussion of the relevant knowledge of this right. This article is divided into four parts. The first part, the general introduction of the right of recovery. In this part, the author through the broad sense of the right of recovery, narrow sense concept, the legal characteristics of the right of recovery, The general conditions of the exercise of the right of restitution and the introduction of the nature of the right of restitution make the reader have a clearer understanding of the overall appearance of the right. Part two, the classification of the right of restitution. In this part, the author mainly draws lessons from the more successful legislative experience of various countries. According to the characteristics of the three types of the right of recovery, this paper makes a detailed deconstruction and analysis. The third part, the theoretical analysis of the right of recovery. This part as the focus of this article, from the economic, cultural, legal perspective, It explains the value and significance of the existence of the system of the right of recovery. The author also puts forward the author's opinion on the focus of the controversy in the academic circles. This part is actually a demonstration of the rationality of the existence of the right of restitution and the feasibility of the practice in the academic circles. According to the current situation of the rule of law in our country and drawing on the legislative experience of foreign countries, the author puts forward a preliminary legislative conception for the establishment of the system of the right of recovery in China.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】