网络著作权侵权损害赔偿案例研究
发布时间:2018-03-30 02:16
本文选题:网络著作权 切入点:侵权损害赔偿 出处:《上海交通大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:互联网络的迅猛发展改变了我们的生活,但也产生了很多新的冲突和纠纷,使得我们不得不考虑重新分配和调整权利和利益。新的技术带来的法律问题更多的集中在著作权领域。互联网改变了作品的传播方式,侵权形式日益复杂多样,较传统侵权更为隐蔽,使得对著作权的保护成了难题。网络著作权侵权是一种新的著作权侵权类型,它使传统的著作权理论面临严峻的考验与挑战,也使现存立法呈现出明显的滞后性,甚至造成司法实践无法可依,这不仅不利于鼓励作者创作创新,而且会阻碍互联网行业的健康发展。因此建立、健全我国的网络著作权侵权损害赔偿制度,促进我国网络著作权保护体系的完善,维护网络著作权人的权益,切实保障各方利益,显得尤为重要。 网络著作权是基于文学、艺术和科学领域内具有独创性并能以某种有形形式复制的智力成果,在网络环境下依法产生的权利。网络著作权物质载体无形,权利归属复杂,复制方便快捷,这些特点都决定了网络著作权与传统著作权有着很大的不同,所以网络著作权的侵权损害赔偿也有着自身的特点。在归责原则上,网络著作权应同时适用过错责任原则和无过错责任原则。在保护方式上,网络著作权人既可要求侵权人赔偿损害,也可要求其停止侵害、消除影响、赔礼道歉,还可以两者并用。网络著作权侵权损害赔偿范围包括合理费用和补偿性赔偿,在适度保护下,一般情况都可适用补偿性赔偿。侵权行为发生后,权利人实际损害与侵权人获利均难以计算时,当前法律规定的50万以下的法定赔偿范围在适用上没有统一的参照标准,需要法官以法律为准绳,根据客观侵权事实和法官自己的审判经验,仔细地分析和判断案情,全面综合解决当事人争议时要考虑的因素,最终确定合理的赔偿数额。网络著作权侵权损害赔偿还应考虑精神损害赔偿的适用,对于侵犯网络著作人身权,即纯粹体现人格利益的网络著作权,主要以赔礼道歉和消除影响为主,,辅以精神损害赔偿。而对于涉及财产利益的网络著作权,则主要以金钱赔偿为主。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet has changed our lives, but it has also created many new conflicts and disputes. We have to think about redistributing and adjusting rights and benefits. The legal issues brought about by the new technology are more concentrated in the area of copyright. The Internet has changed the way works are distributed, and the forms of infringement have become increasingly complex and diverse. The network copyright infringement is a new type of copyright infringement, which makes the traditional copyright theory face severe test and challenge. It also causes the existing legislation to show obvious lag, and even causes the judicial practice to be unable to follow, which is not only not conducive to encouraging the author to create and innovate, but also will hinder the healthy development of the Internet industry. It is very important to perfect the system of compensation for network copyright infringement in our country, to promote the perfection of network copyright protection system, to safeguard the rights and interests of network copyright owners and to protect the interests of all parties. Network copyright is a kind of intellectual achievement which has originality in literature, art and science and can be copied in some tangible form. It is a kind of rights produced according to law under the network environment. The material carrier of network copyright is intangible, and the rights belong to complex. These characteristics determine that the network copyright is very different from the traditional copyright, so the network copyright infringement compensation also has its own characteristics. Both the principle of fault liability and the principle of no-fault liability shall be applied to the copyright of the network. In the way of protection, the copyright owner of the network may request the infringer to compensate for the damage, or to demand that the infringer stop the infringement, eliminate the influence, and make an apology. The scope of network copyright infringement damages includes reasonable expenses and compensatory compensation. Under appropriate protection, compensatory compensation can be applied in general. When the actual damage of the obligee and the profit of the infringer are difficult to calculate, there is no uniform standard of reference in the application of the legal compensation scope below 500000 stipulated by the current law, which requires the judge to take the law as the yardstick. According to the facts of objective infringement and the judge's own trial experience, to carefully analyze and judge the case, and to comprehensively and synthetically consider the factors to be taken into account in the settlement of disputes between the parties, Finally determine the reasonable amount of compensation. Network copyright infringement damages should also consider the application of compensation for moral damage, for the infringement of the personal rights of network works, that is, purely reflect the personal interests of the network copyright, Mainly to apologize and eliminate the impact of the main, supplemented by compensation for moral damage, and for the property interests of the network copyright, mainly to the money compensation.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 焦和平;;论我国《著作权法》上“信息网络传播权”的完善——以“非交互式”网络传播行为侵权认定为视角[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年06期
2 ;北京市高级人民法院关于著作权侵权损害赔偿问题的调查报告(上)[J];电子知识产权;2005年05期
3 刘铁光;;法定赔偿在著作权司法适用中的变异[J];电子知识产权;2008年04期
4 陈加胜;;信息网络传播权与链接的关系[J];电子知识产权;2010年02期
5 王迁;;论“信息网络传播权”的含义 兼评“成功多媒体诉时越公司案”一审判决[J];法律适用;2008年12期
6 申建平;;俄罗斯精神损害赔偿制度的启示与借鉴[J];法学杂志;2011年11期
7 丛立先;;网络版权侵权行为构成要件探论[J];法学评论;2007年05期
8 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
9 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
10 王迁;论版权法中的间接责任[J];科技与法律;2005年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 华东政法学院 王迁 博士;[N];文汇报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 黄山;网络著作权侵权损害赔偿研究[D];湖南大学;2007年
本文编号:1683908
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/1683908.html