网络中介服务提供者的版权间接侵权责任研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 17:44

本文选题：网络中介服务提供者　切入点：间接侵权责任　出处：《湖南师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着信息技术的迅猛发展,互联网的使用已经渗透到各个领域。大量信息和作品的传播在给人们带去便捷和愉悦的同时,各种版权侵权纠纷问题也日益凸显。作为互联网版权间接侵权主要行为人的网络中介服务提供者,其版权侵权责任成为了近年来的热点问题。网络服务提供者版权侵权责任存在着“直接侵权”和“间接侵权”之分。对于直接提供内容服务的网络服务提供者一般情况下承担直接侵权责任这一点,学界没有太大争议。但网络中介服务提供者由于其在法律地位、运营方式及技术模式等方面的特殊性,则可能由于其客观上帮助了直接侵权行为人而承担间接侵权责任。与美国等西方发达国家对“间接侵权”规则的完善规定相比,我国立法上仅出现了一些有关间接侵权责任认定的分散的零星的规定,这些规定很多情况下是在没有相关法理基础支撑的情况下照搬国外的立法或司法实践形成的,往往导致不能很好的适用于中国的司法实践中。对于有效保护版权人的合法权益还显得过于单薄,现实案例中往往是版权人的诉求和损失难以依照既有法律规定得到满足。正是由于我国版权法对版权间接侵权责任没有明确系统的规定,法院在司法实践过程中遇到间接侵权责任问题时,往往只能借用民法框架下的共同侵权制度来弥补版权法上的缺憾。这不但对法院的司法实践缺乏相应的指导,而且在理解适用的过程中容易产生歧义。尤其是对诸如“百度案”、“雅虎案”这样类似案件的不同判决所引发的争议,使得我们必须加快完善立法,进一步完善版权间接侵权责任制度。全文从网络中介服务提供者版权间接侵权责任的基本理论入手,分析了网络中介服务提供者承担间接侵权责任的合理性,对侵权责任的类型,间接侵权的构成要件及间接侵权与共同侵权的区别等进行了阐述。对我国现存立法中有关网络版权间接侵权的规定进行了详细介绍,同时结合我国司法实践,论述了我国网络版权间接侵权制度立法之不足,指出了明确规定网络版权间接侵权责任制度的必要性。在立足我国现状,借鉴外国先进立法的基础上,形成符合我国国情的平衡网络用户、网络服务提供者和版权人三者间利益的责任机制。具体而言,建议引入替代侵权并完善帮助侵权责任制度以构建系统的版权间接侵权责任制度,同时明确网络服务者“主观过错”的判定标准及其合理注意义务,明确已有法条的具体应用条件及标准,以期更好的指导司法实践,进一步探索出解决互联网版权纠纷的途径。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of information technology, the use of the Internet has penetrated into all fields. All kinds of copyright infringement disputes are also becoming increasingly prominent. As the main perpetrator of indirect copyright infringement on the Internet, the Internet intermediary service provider, The liability for copyright infringement has become a hot issue in recent years. There are "direct infringement" and "indirect infringement" between copyright infringement liability of network service provider. In general, to assume direct liability for tort, There is no great controversy in academic circles. However, because of its particularity in legal status, operation mode and technical model, network intermediary service provider, It may be because it objectively helps the direct tortfeasor to bear the indirect tort liability. Compared with the perfect regulations of the "indirect tort" rules in the United States and other western developed countries, In our legislation, there are only a few scattered provisions on the identification of indirect tort liability, many of which are formed by copying foreign legislation or judicial practice without the support of relevant legal theories. It often leads to not being well suited to the judicial practice in China. It is still too weak for the effective protection of the legitimate rights and interests of copyright holders. In real cases, it is difficult to satisfy the demand and loss of copyright owners in accordance with the existing laws and regulations. It is precisely because there is no clear and systematic regulation on the liability for indirect copyright infringement in China's copyright law. When the court encounters the problem of indirect tort liability in the course of judicial practice, it can only use the common tort system under the framework of civil law to make up for the defects in copyright law, which is not only lack of corresponding guidance to the judicial practice of the court. Moreover, it is easy to produce ambiguity in the process of understanding its application. In particular, disputes over different judgments in similar cases, such as the Baidu case and the Yahoo case, make it necessary for us to speed up the improvement of the legislation. Further improve the system of indirect copyright infringement liability. Starting with the basic theory of indirect copyright infringement liability of network intermediary service provider, this paper analyzes the rationality of network intermediary service provider's undertaking indirect tort liability, and the types of tort liability. The constitution of indirect infringement and the difference between indirect infringement and joint infringement are expounded. The provisions of the existing legislation on indirect infringement of network copyright in our country are introduced in detail, and combined with the judicial practice of our country, This paper discusses the deficiency of the legislation of indirect infringement of network copyright in our country, and points out the necessity of clearly stipulating the system of indirect tort liability of network copyright. Based on the present situation of our country, the author draws lessons from the advanced legislation of foreign countries. To form a liability mechanism to balance the interests of network users, network service providers and copyright owners in line with the national conditions of our country. It is suggested that the system of indirect liability for copyright infringement should be constructed by introducing alternative tort and perfecting the system of helping tort liability, and at the same time, the judgment standard of "subjective fault" and the reasonable duty of care of network server should be clarified. In order to guide judicial practice better and further explore the ways to solve Internet copyright disputes, we should clarify the specific application conditions and standards of the existing articles in order to guide judicial practice better.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】