浅析思想表达二分法在文学作品侵权纠纷中的运用——以琼瑶诉于正案为视角

发布时间：2018-04-18 17:21

本文选题：思想表达二分法 + 实质性相似　；参考：《甘肃政法学院学报》2017年05期

【摘要】：学界一直对著作权中思想与表达的区分持有多种观点,直至"琼瑶诉于正案"中法官对此案的分析与判决,司法实践中终于确定了对这一问题的标准。本文通过阐释思想表达二分法的法理基础,分析对比多种适用方法,探究现阶段存在的问题,最终提出建设性意见,建议司法实践中法官通过分析是否接触、界限位置及受众感受,综合多种方法确认两部作品是否具有实质性相似,使侵权行为无法再存留于思想与表达的模糊边界。
[Abstract]:The academic circles hold various views on the distinction between thought and expression in copyright until the judge's analysis and judgment in Qiong Yao v. the right case, and the standard of this problem has finally been determined in the judicial practice.By explaining the legal basis of the dichotomy of thought expression, this paper analyzes and compares various applicable methods, probes into the problems existing at the present stage, finally puts forward constructive suggestions, and suggests that judges should contact with each other in judicial practice by analyzing whether they are in contact with each other.The boundary position and the audience's feeling, synthesizes various methods to confirm whether the two works have substantial similarity, so that the tort can no longer exist in the vague boundary of thought and expression.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;东北财经大学;
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】