学术期刊评价对新增一级学科的影响——以公安学与其他新增一级学科比较为中心

发布时间：2018-04-22 20:47

本文选题：学术期刊 + 学术评价　；参考：《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：作为学术平台的学术期刊是学科构建和发展必备的要素,具有不可替代的作用,而学术期刊评价又直接关涉学术期刊作用的发挥。当前,新增人文社会科学各一级学科因各自不同的特点而面临着不同的发展使命,其中公安学是最年轻的新兴学科,具有应用性强、国家急需等特点,但现有学术期刊评价体系在应用性评价和新兴学科准入方面均存在一定缺陷,不利于新兴学科的发展。因此,针对公安学等新兴学科期刊的评价,应建立包含有学术性与应用性两个维度的评价指标体系,构建和运用这个指标体系的主体,当然是该学科学术共同体而不是其他。专业评价机构的作用在于为这样的评价做好基本数据服务。因此,作为评价工具的CSSCI等数据库在遴选来源期刊时,应做到对一级学科的全覆盖和数据的高质量,从而为通过公正的评价来推动公安学等新兴学科的良性发展发挥作用。
[Abstract]:As an academic platform, academic journals are essential elements for the construction and development of disciplines, and have an irreplaceable role, while the evaluation of academic journals is directly related to the exertion of the role of academic journals. At present, the newly added humanities and social sciences are facing different development missions because of their different characteristics. Among them, the police science is the youngest emerging discipline, with the characteristics of strong application and urgent need of the country. However, the existing evaluation system of academic journals has some defects in application evaluation and access to emerging disciplines, which is not conducive to the development of emerging disciplines. Therefore, in view of the evaluation of new subjects such as public security science, we should set up an evaluation index system with academic and applied dimensions. The main body of this index system is certainly the academic community of the subject rather than the other. The role of professional evaluation institutions is to do a good job in such an evaluation of the basic data services. Therefore, the database such as CSSCI, as an evaluation tool, should cover all the subjects of the first class and the high quality of the data when selecting the journals, so as to play an important role in promoting the benign development of the new subjects such as public security science through fair evaluation.
【作者单位】：《中国人民公安大学学报》;
【分类号】：D631.15;G237.5

【相似文献】