作品署名权研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 02:33

本文选题：作品署名权 + 著作权　；参考：《河北经贸大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：署名权,即表明作者身份,在作品上署名的权利。作品作为创作者脑力劳动的产物,不仅具有财产价值,还反映作者的人格利益和身份利益。作者只有通过在作品上标记自己的姓名,以行使表示姓名的权利才能表明自己作为创作者的身份。作品署名权是精神权利的核心,是作者重要的人身权利,是著作权的一项基本权能。在著作权纠纷中,很多案例都涉及署名权,因此,对署名权的正确理解和深入认识,对著作权的保护有着重要意义。本文包括引言和结论在内,共六个部分。引言部分是对研究对象的和相关概念的简要说明,以及对本文选题背景、研究价值、研究方法的介绍和阐述。第一部分主要介绍了作品署名权的概念、沿革与比较研究。首先,通过界定作品署名权的概念,阐明署名权的积极权能与消极权能。作者有权决定在自己的作品上署真名、笔名、或者不署名；作者有权禁止未参加创作的人在其作品上署名。然后,探析署名权的起源,比较分析大陆法系和英美法系的沿革。最后,通过以上比较分析来阐述作品署名权的国际保护现状及问题。第二部分分析了作品署名权的性质及其价值。该部分从署名权的性质出发,分别阐述了这一精神权利的人身权属性、财产权属性。同时,对作品署名权的价值进行深入分析,分别从文化价值和经济价值的角度进行了比较细致的探讨。笔者认为作品署名权作为人身权利的重要组成部分,不仅具有人格权和身份权的属性,还在一定程度上影响和决定着作品的市场价值。在价值论部分,通过对署名权的精神文化价值和经济价值的分析,展现了署名权的精神实质和重要意义。第三部分在第一、二部分对作品署名权概念的界定和性质、价值分析的基础上,列举了署名权在行使中的一些问题。首先,阐述了在署名权转让与继承的问题,署名权的人身权性质决定了其具有不可转让的特性。其次,探析“冒名”行为的性质,大多数观点认为冒别人之名是对被冒名人署名权的一种侵犯。最后,探讨网络环境下的作品署名权,互联网的飞速发展给作品署名权带来了新的挑战。第四部分的主要内容是署名权行使的法律规制。一方面,阐述了我国有关作品署名权的法律规定,而后探讨了作品署名权的民事责任,包括归责原则、构成要件和侵权行为的认定。署名权侵权行为的归责原则应当实行过错责任原则,只要行为人尽到了合理的注意义务,就不应被课以赔偿责任。另一方面,根据文章上一部分讨论的问题,列举署名权正当行使的标准,并探讨对行使署名权的一些合理限制。结论部分将全文各章节的主要观点进行了概括和整理,对于其中的重点问题进行了归纳和总结。
[Abstract]:The right of authorship, that is, the right to express the identity of the author and to sign on the work. As the product of the creator's mental work, the work not only has property value, but also reflects the author's personal and identity interests. Only by marking his name on the work can the author exercise his right to express his name. The right of authorship is the core of spiritual right, the author's important personal right and the basic power of copyright. In the copyright dispute, many cases are related to the right of signature, therefore, the correct understanding and in-depth understanding of the right of authorship is of great significance to the protection of copyright. This paper includes six parts, including introduction and conclusion. The introduction part is a brief description of the research object and related concepts, as well as the introduction and elaboration of the background, research value and research methods of this paper. The first part mainly introduces the concept, evolution and comparative study of the right of authorship. First of all, by defining the concept of authorship, this paper clarifies the positive and negative power of authorship. The author has the right to decide whether to sign a real name, a pseudonym, or not to sign a name in his work; the author has the right to prohibit anyone who has not participated in the creation from signing the name of his work. Then, the origin of the power of signature is analyzed, and the evolution of the civil law system and the common law system is compared. Finally, through the above comparative analysis to explain the status quo and problems of the international protection of the right of authorship. The second part analyzes the nature and value of the right of authorship. Starting from the nature of the right of signature, this part expounds the attribute of personal right and property right of this spiritual right. At the same time, the author makes a thorough analysis of the value of the right of authorship, and probes into it in detail from the angle of cultural value and economic value. The author thinks that as an important part of personal rights, the authorship of works not only has the attributes of personality rights and identity rights, but also influences and determines the market value of works to a certain extent. In the theory of value, through the analysis of the spiritual, cultural and economic value of the right of authorship, the spiritual essence and significance of the right of authorship are shown. The third part lists some problems in the exercise of the right of authorship on the basis of the definition and nature of the concept of the right of authorship and the analysis of its value in the first and second parts. First of all, the transfer and inheritance of the right of signature are discussed. The nature of the personal right of the right of authorship determines its non-transferable characteristics. Secondly, by analyzing the nature of "impersonation", most people think that taking someone else's name is an infringement of the right to be impersonated. Finally, this paper discusses the authorship of works under the network environment, and the rapid development of the Internet brings new challenges to the authorship of works. The fourth part of the main content is the legal regulation of the exercise of the right of authorship. On the one hand, it expounds the legal provisions of the right of authorship of works in our country, and then discusses the civil liability of the right of authorship of works, including the principle of imputation, the elements of constitution and the determination of tort. The principle of imputation of the right of signature tort should implement the principle of fault liability, so long as the actor has fulfilled the reasonable duty of care, he should not be subject to compensation liability. On the other hand, according to the problems discussed in part of the article, the author enumerates the criteria for the proper exercise of the power of authorship, and probes into some reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the power of authorship. In the conclusion part, the main points of each chapter are summarized and summarized.
【学位授予单位】：河北经贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】