图书校对规范依据不足之探讨

发布时间：2018-05-02 06:09

本文选题：图书校对 + 语言文字规范　；参考：《四川师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：国家法律法规和国家标准、语言学者研究成果、社会习惯是图书校对的三大依据。文章通过实践,对校对工作中所遇到的语言文字规范例子进行分析,指出这三大校对依据的疏漏,提出现今在校对工作中难以解决的语言文字问题,试图对校对工作中尚不能参考现规范依据的语言问题提出解决之道。全文分六章,第一章主要说明校对是保证图书质量的重要环节；第二章介绍图书校对的规范依据,静态规范依据是国家法律法规和国家标准、语言学者研究成果,动态规范依据是社会习惯；第三章、第四章分别从字、词语、语法、标点符号、数字用法等方面提出静态规范依据的不足,同时对一些常见的而规范依据又尚未规定的语言文字问题进行了陈述；第五章例举了社会习惯和规范相出入的例子,并给出解决的方法；第六章回到图书校对本身,提出图书校对应对之策。
[Abstract]:National laws and regulations, national standards, linguists' research results, social habits are the three bases for proofreading. Through practice, this paper analyzes the examples of language and character norms encountered in proofreading work, points out the omissions of the three proofreading bases, and puts forward the problems of language and characters that are difficult to solve in the present school proofreading work. This paper attempts to put forward solutions to the language problems which can not be referred to the current normative basis in proofreading. The first chapter mainly explains that proofreading is an important link to guarantee the quality of books, the second chapter introduces the normative basis of book proofreading, the static normative basis is the national laws and regulations, the national standards, and the research results of linguists. Chapter three, Chapter four, respectively, puts forward the deficiency of static normative basis from the aspects of word, word, grammar, punctuation, numeral usage, etc. At the same time, it states some common language problems which have not been stipulated in the normative basis. Chapter five gives examples of social habits and norms, and gives the solutions. Chapter VI goes back to the proofreading itself. The countermeasures of book proofreading are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G232.2

【参考文献】