论编辑“工匠精神”的失落与复归

发布时间：2018-05-13 05:28

本文选题：工匠精神 + 编辑　；参考：《出版发行研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：本文立足于语言与历史的双重演化逻辑,系统考察了"工匠""匠人"精神以及编辑"匠心"的失落与复归,旨在为这些引起广泛关注的议题发掘深层次的理论根基。在词源学/语义学层次上,"工匠"和"编辑"都起源于社会底层的手工技艺性活动,其行业精神和"匠心"天然具足,只是随着社会历史的进展其本真内涵被逐渐淡化、遮蔽,乃至于沦为次要甚或贬义义项,直到德里达的"语言学革命"才为其"正名";在历史层面上,工匠和编辑活动作为手工业时代的重要代表,伴随着福特主义和商品经济的到来迅速衰落,又伴随着后福特主义的盛行而重新回归,而且后者与理论界所谓的后现代主义、消费社会和"审美资本主义"的来临同步演进。
[Abstract]:Based on the dual evolutionary logic of language and history, this paper systematically examines the spirit of "craftsman" and the loss and reversion of "craftsman" as well as the "heart of craftsman", in order to explore the deep theoretical foundation for these issues which have aroused widespread concern. At the level of etymology / semantics, both "artisans" and "editors" originated from the craftsmanship activities at the bottom of the society. The spirit of the trade and the heart of the craftsmen are naturally sufficient, but with the development of social history, their true connotations are gradually desalinated and obscured. It was not until Derrida's "linguistic revolution" that he became a minor or even derogatory term; at the historical level, artisans and editors were an important representative of the handicraft age, Along with the arrival and rapid decline of Ford doctrine and commodity economy, and with the prevalence of post-Ford doctrine, the latter has evolved synchronously with the so-called post-modernism, consumer society and "aesthetic capitalism" in the theoretical circle.
【作者单位】：重庆大学新闻学院;
【分类号】：G230

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前1条

1 王振铎;;中国文化传媒的宗师——论孔子对中国文化传播媒介的编辑创构[J];寻根;2005年06期

【共引文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前1条

1 李金正;;论编辑“工匠精神”的失落与复归[J];出版发行研究;2017年04期

【相似文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前1条

1 ;《劳动的解放:工会、左派和福特主义的危机》[J];国外理论动态;2004年05期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库前2条

1 陈佳奇;共享式创新：众创空间的创客及其互动[D];中央民族大学;2016年

2 相青梅;以麦当劳为例探讨美国社会文化发展与企业经营之间的相互作用[D];外交学院;2011年