著作人身权制度研究
本文选题:一般人格权 + 著作人身权 ; 参考:《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:作为财产法制度中的特例,著作权法上专门的人身权制度使得著作权法区别于物权法、债权法等传统的民法,而著作人身权的转让可能性又模糊了这一界限,其本身仍然表现出一种区别于传统精神权利的特征。本文就是针对这一困惑,针对民法中的人格权、著作权法中的人身权,试图厘清两者的关系。同时,针对著作人身权在著作权交易市场中可否进行交易的理论困境,提出自己的建议。 本文正文分为七个部分: 第一部分通过对一般人格权与著作人身权的对比,著作人身权与一般人格权虽然都涉及精神人格利益,但是两者之间具有明显的差异,造成这些不同的原因可以归结为:著作人身权是与作品相联系的。另外,著作人身权与著作财产权有密切的联系,有时著作人身权需要结合著作财产权才能实现,如发表权与复制权、发行权结合行使;而一般人身权与财产权却没有这种关系。 第二部分将通过对大陆法系、英美法系以及国际公约的一般人格权与著作人身权的梳理,明确不同法系针对一般人格权与著作人身权的差异,在法理以及立法技术上的处理。 第三部分针对著作权法自身的著作人身权与著作财产权的关系,著作人身权与著作财产权之间的关系比一般的物权中财产权与人格权之间的关系不同。创作行为作为一种特殊的劳动,创作的作品作为作者的劳动成果,应当归劳动者所有。同时,作品一旦创作完成,就脱离了作者,与民法中的物没有什么不同,但是,民法基本理论从来没有发展或者试图创造出物权人身权、债权人身权,本部分这对这一问题,试图明确为什么物权法没有物权人身权,债法上没有债权人身权,而偏偏著作权法上产生了著作人身权。 第四部分在版权市场中讨论著作人身权,还是基于人身权的不可让与性与财产权的流转性之间的矛盾,以及主张版权法为财产法的学者的担忧,即著作人身权的存在是否影响了越来越繁荣的版权市场的交易的进行或合作方式的多元化,面对版权市场的发展,著作人身权制度应当如何进行积极的反应。 第五部分应对目前数字技术的发展,数字环境对传统著作人身权的冲击,以及在数字环境中,探讨著作人身权的放弃与保护。 第六部分以及第七部分通过前述部分的总结与分析,试图提出关于我国著作人身权制度的思考以及未来著作权发展的可能路径。
[Abstract]:As a special case in the property law system, the special personal right system in the copyright law distinguishes the copyright law from the traditional civil law, such as the property law, the creditor's rights law, and so on. It itself still shows a characteristic which is different from the traditional spiritual right. In view of this confusion, this paper tries to clarify the relationship between the two rights in view of personality rights in civil law and personal rights in copyright law. At the same time, in view of the theoretical dilemma of whether the personal right of the author can be traded in the copyright trading market, the author puts forward his own suggestions. The text of this paper is divided into seven parts: In the first part, through the comparison between the general personality right and the author's personal right, the author's personal right and the general personality right are both related to the interests of spiritual personality, but there are obvious differences between them. The reasons for these differences can be summed up as: the author's personal right is related to the work. In addition, the personal right of a work is closely related to the property right of a work, sometimes the personal right of a work can be realized by combining the property right of a work, such as the right of publication and the right of reproduction, and the right of circulation, but the general right of person and the right of property have no such relationship. In the second part, by combing the general personality right and the author's personal right of the civil law system, the common law system and the international convention, it is clear that the different legal systems deal with the difference between the general personality right and the author's personal right in the legal theory and the legislative technique. The third part aims at the relationship between personal right and property right in copyright law. The relationship between personal right and property right is different from that between property right and personality right in real right. As a special kind of labor, the creation behavior should be owned by the laborer as the result of the author's labor. At the same time, once the work has been created, it is divorced from the author, which is no different from the thing in the civil law. However, the basic theory of civil law has never developed or attempted to create the personal right of the real right, the personal right of the creditor, this part of this question, This paper tries to find out why there is no personal right in real right law, and no personal right of creditor in debt law, but in copyright law there is personal right in works. In the fourth part, the author discusses the contradiction between the personal right of the author or the non-transferability of the personal right and the transference of the property right in the copyright market, as well as the concern of the scholars who claim that the copyright law is the property law. That is, whether the existence of the personal right of the author has affected the transaction of the more and more prosperous copyright market or the diversification of the cooperation mode. In the face of the development of the copyright market, the author's personal right system should react positively. The fifth part deals with the development of digital technology, the impact of digital environment on the personal rights of the traditional works, and discusses the abandonment and protection of the personal rights of the works in the digital environment. The sixth part and the seventh part, through the summary and analysis of the foregoing part, try to put forward the thinking about the system of personal right of the author in our country and the possible path of the development of copyright in the future.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D923.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 袁煌;侯瀚宇;;版权价值评估对象及其价值影响因素探讨[J];中国资产评估;2011年08期
2 潘佳浔;;我国著作权侵权精神损害赔偿必要性研究[J];知识经济;2011年13期
3 刘志芳;齐峰;;知识共享许可协议在高校机构知识库著作权管理中的应用研究[J];图书馆学研究;2011年18期
4 刘璐;;利益平衡—著作权法之精髓[J];湘潮(下半月);2011年05期
5 凌潇;云虹;;罪与罚——私权视角下的侵犯知识产权犯罪问题拓补[J];法制与社会;2011年22期
6 熊琦;;著作权法定许可的正当性解构与制度替代[J];知识产权;2011年06期
7 覃炳文;;征集广告语的著作权保护——以“天高几许问真龙”案为例[J];知识经济;2011年18期
8 祝建军;;信息网络传播行为的判断[J];中国版权;2010年01期
9 王迁;;《版权法中私人复制问题研究——从印刷机到互联网》评介[J];中国版权;2010年02期
10 冯晓青;付继存;;著作权法中的复制权研究[J];法学家;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 张雪雁;;论委托作品著作财产权法定归属的社会效益——评《著作权法》第17条[A];2007年全国法经济学论坛论文集[C];2007年
2 任全明;;平面设计的知识产权保护[A];首届中国高校美术与设计论坛论文集(下)[C];2010年
3 ;《明史研究论丛》稿约[A];明史研究论丛(第九辑)[C];2011年
4 连毅;;浅议网络环境下著作权的保护[A];第三届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2010年
5 丁鹏;;论我国民族民间文化的法律保护——以蒙古族服饰艺术为例[A];民族法学评论(第七卷)[C];2010年
6 吴春岐;;效率视野中的委托作品著作权归属分析——兼评《著作权法》第十七条[A];《制度经济学研究》第二辑[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 陈原;剽窃?还是“被署名”?[N];人民日报;2010年
2 毕荣建邋李浩;著作人身权权利定性引发的思考[N];人民法院报;2008年
3 本报记者 黄星航 费文彬 本报通讯员 关秀献;广西“真龙”之争[N];人民法院报;2005年
4 吉林大学法学院 毕荣建;应承认法人享有著作人身权[N];检察日报;2009年
5 周 s,
本文编号:1885944
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/1885944.html