从“更正”内容管窥学术期刊的编校质量管理——以CSSCI收录的新闻传播学期刊为例

发布时间：2018-05-23 11:33

本文选题：更正 + 编校质量管理　；参考：《中国科技期刊研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：【目的】研究新闻传播学期刊中更正的内容特征与存在的问题,为学术期刊编校出版质量的提高提供参考。【方法】以2014—2015年中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)新闻传播学期刊中的更正内容为例进行内容分析。【结果】新闻传播学期刊更正内容的特征为:事实型错误比例大,人名更正占主导;文字型错误类型集中,错别字现象严重;专业知识型错误更正条数少,对期刊质量影响大。在更正过程中主要存在更正栏目不规范,更正滞后、效果差,致歉少、责任归属不明确的问题。【结论】需要从加强编辑团队建设、完善编校环节,同行专家审查与作者自查并行、规避学术硬伤,常设更正栏目、完善公开更正制度这三方面强化学术期刊的编校质量管理。
[Abstract]:[objective] to study the characteristics and problems of the corrected contents in the Journals of Journalism and Communication. To provide reference for improving the quality of editing and publishing of academic journals. [methods] taking the corrected contents of CSSCI (Chinese Social Science Citation Index) in 2014-2015 as an example, the content analysis is carried out. [results] News Communication. The characteristics of the corrected contents of periodicals are: large proportion of factual errors, The correction of personal names is dominant; the typology of typesetting errors is concentrated, and the phenomenon of typesetting is serious; the number of correction items of professional knowledge errors is small, which has a great influence on the quality of periodicals. In the correction process, there are some problems, such as the correction column is not standardized, the correction is lagging behind, the effect is poor, the apology is less, and the responsibility is not clear. [conclusion] it is necessary to strengthen the construction of the editorial team and perfect the editing and correction links. In parallel with the author's self-examination, the peer expert review strengthens the quality management of academic journals in three aspects: avoiding academic harms, standing correction columns and perfecting the system of open correction.
【作者单位】：重庆大学新闻学院;中国人民大学新闻学院;
【分类号】：G232

【参考文献】