中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验摘要报告质量评估

发布时间：2018-05-28 08:36

  本文选题：随机对照试验 + 摘要　； 参考：《中国科技期刊研究》2017年12期

【摘要】：【目的】评估7种优秀中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验(RCT)摘要报告质量,为提高我国医学期刊RCT摘要报告质量提供依据。【方法】在万方数据库中检索7种临床医学期刊近年来发表的RCT文献,根据《期刊与学术会议论文摘要中报告随机对照试验的CONSORT声明》评估摘要报告质量。【结果】检索到RCT文献284篇,摘要条目总体报告率为41.10%~50.00%,平均报告率为46.03%。《中华儿科杂志》《中华内科杂志》《中华眼科杂志》2011—2013年稿约中无摘要CONSORT要求,RCT摘要条目报告率平均为45.38%,2014—2016年稿约中有摘要CONSORT要求,摘要条目报告率平均为45.11%。摘要条目中,目的和结论报告率最高,报告率为100%,分配隐藏方法、试验注册、标题、试验设计等条目报告率较低。【结论】我国医学期刊RCT摘要报告质量有待提高,尤其应当加强针对标题、试验设计、是否采用盲法、分析例数、试验注册等条目的报告。期刊编辑应当重视并且主动承担RCT摘要规范化的责任,保证RCT摘要的质量。
[Abstract]:[objective] to evaluate the quality of summary reports of seven excellent Chinese clinical medical journals in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). In order to provide the basis for improving the quality of RCT summary reports in Chinese medical journals. [methods] Seven clinical medical journals published in recent years were searched for RCT in Wanfang database. [results] 284 articles of RCT were retrieved according to the CONSORT statements of randomized controlled trials reported in the abstract of papers of journals and academic conferences, and the quality of summary reports was evaluated. The total reporting rate of items was 41.100.The average reporting rate was 46.03.No abstract CONSORT was required in the 2011-2013 draft of < Chinese Journal of Pediatrics > Chinese Journal of Medicine > Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, and the average reporting rate of summary items was 45.38%. The average item reporting rate was 45.11. Among the items, objective and conclusion report rate is the highest, the reporting rate is 100, the distribution of hidden methods, experimental registration, title, experimental design and other items reporting rate is relatively low. [conclusion] the quality of RCT summary report in Chinese medical journals needs to be improved. In particular, we should strengthen the report on the title, experimental design, blind method, analysis of the number of examples, test registration, etc. Periodical editors should take the responsibility of standardization of RCT abstracts and guarantee the quality of RCT abstracts.
【作者单位】： 中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所北京协和医学院《中华皮肤科杂志》编辑部;
【基金】：中国科协精品科技期刊工程项目第四期“期刊学术质量提升项目”(2015—2017)
【分类号】：G232
，

本文编号：1946033