艺术“挪用”引起的法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-05-31 15:07
本文选题:挪用 + 著作权 ; 参考:《中央美术学院》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 艺术法的形成、发展离不开二十世纪七十年代欧美各国的艺术品投资热潮,法律工作者和艺术家在实践基础上不断进行总结。但在以往发表的研究成果中,他们依照已有的法律条款、司法解释来处理艺术市场中出现的问题。由于艺术法的跨学科性,以法律工作者为主导的艺术法研究往往忽视了艺术创作自身的规律、特点。 随着艺术史发展,“挪用”作为艺术家表达思想的一种重要创作手法被频繁运用。但在法律领域内,这一行为却不容易被理解:“挪用”这一词在法律里的使用语境,涉及的是《刑法》“挪用公款”等条款;即便涉及到保护智力劳动成果的《著作权法》,由于“挪用”产生的艺术作品不符合法律里关于作品需要具备的“独创性”要件,这使得在以往的司法判例中,基于“挪用”进行创作的艺术家处于非常不利的位置。从中,我们也可以看到,仅依照原有的研究角度是难以处理好此问题。 本文将从艺术创作自身的规律出发,对“挪用”引起的法律问题进行研究。通过对有关案例的艺术社会学和法学的分析,厘清“挪用”在艺术与法律中的不同涵义,并对艺术中的“挪用”行为面临的法律困境,做出分析、提出解决策略。
[Abstract]:The formation of art law can not be separated from the upsurge of art investment in Europe and the United States in the 1970s, and legal workers and artists continue to sum up on the basis of practice. But in the past published research results, they deal with the problems in the art market according to the existing legal provisions. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of art law, the law of art, led by legal workers, often ignores the laws and characteristics of art creation itself. With the development of art history, misappropriation is frequently used as an important creative technique for artists to express their ideas. However, in the field of law, this act is not easy to understand: "misappropriation" in the context of the use of the law, involving the "misappropriation of public funds" and other provisions; Even when it comes to the copyright Law, which protects the fruits of intellectual labor, because the works of art produced by "misappropriation" do not meet the requirements of "originality" in the law concerning the work, this makes it possible in previous judicial precedents. Artists who create based on "misappropriation" are in a very disadvantageous position. From this, we can also see that it is difficult to deal with this problem according to the original research angle. Based on the law of artistic creation, this paper studies the legal problems caused by misappropriation. Through the analysis of the art sociology and the jurisprudence of the relevant cases, this paper clarifies the different meanings of "misappropriation" in art and law, and analyzes the legal dilemma of the "misappropriation" in art, and puts forward some countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:中央美术学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D924.3;D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 金渝林;论作品的独创性[J];法学研究;1995年04期
,本文编号:1960213
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/1960213.html