撤销论文制度及出版伦理建设问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 10:51

本文选题：期刊编辑出版 + 学术著作　；参考：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年05期

【摘要】：Elsevier的一桩撤销论文案引发了学术著作出版事后审理制度及出版伦理建设问题的讨论。一方面,我国的学术著作出版机制尚不健全,不论是在编辑出版实践环节还是在编辑出版学理论研究中,都还没有注意到出版伦理问题,这与我国学术出版的"走出去"战略是不相适应的;另一方面,现行的撤销论文制度被用于纠正同行评议审稿制度过失或处理学术不端行为时,具有很大的弹性,且效力有限,并会给出版者造成经济和名誉上的损失。在中国学术出版伦理建设过程中,应当正视这些问题,遵从学术界和出版界的共同期望,构建有实践效力的撤销论文制度,以完善我国的学术著作评价体系和学术出版规范。
[Abstract]:A case of Elsevier's withdrawal of papers has led to a discussion on the system of post-publication trial of academic works and the construction of publishing ethics. On the one hand, the publishing mechanism of academic works in our country is not perfect, neither in the practice of editing and publishing, nor in the theoretical study of editing and publishing, but also in the issue of publishing ethics. This is not compatible with the "going out" strategy of academic publishing in China. On the other hand, the current system of revocation of papers is used to correct errors in the peer review system or to deal with academic misconduct, with great flexibility and limited effectiveness. And would cause financial and reputational damage to the publisher. In the course of the construction of academic publishing ethics in China, we should face these problems squarely, comply with the common expectations of academic and publishing circles, construct a system of revocation of papers with practical effect, so as to perfect the evaluation system of academic works and academic publication norms in China.
【作者单位】：河南大学学报编辑部;河南大学新闻与传播学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中国学术论著出版业态与编审评价体制研究”(13AXW007)阶段性成果
【分类号】：G230

【参考文献】