生物医学学术图书出版规律探讨与对策研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 13:31

本文选题：生物医学 + 学术图书　；参考：《中国人民解放军军事医学科学院》2011年博士论文

【摘要】：当前,我国的出版事业空前繁荣,图书出版品种和数量逐年增加,版权贸易活跃,从每年图书出版品种、数量等方面看,我国已步入世界出版大国的行列。学术图书出版是出版产业的重要组成部分,生物医学学术图书出版是学术出版最活跃的领域之一。但是,在我国出版的生物医学学术图书中,影印、翻译、编译等出版形式占了较大比重,原创性的学术图书很少,尤其缺乏经典的学术著作。欧美等发达国家所出版的英文生物医学学术图书占据了世界生物医学学术图书出版的主流,代表了当前国际生物医学学术图书出版的趋势和方向。本研究通过对欧美发达国家出版的英文生物医学学术图书的分析,探求生物医学学术图书的出版规律;并通过中外生物医学学术图书出版比较研究,发现我国与发达国家的差距,进一步寻找缩小差距的对策,对提高我国生物医学学术图书出版水平具有重要意义。本研究首先采用计量研究、案例研究、专家咨询等方法,针对生物医学发展与学术图书出版之间的关系,对生物医学学术图书出版规律进行了研究;其次,通过对中外围绕同一主题出版的生物医学学术图书进行了比较研究,以发现中外生物医学学术图书出版的差距;最后,基于以上研究得出的出版规律对生物医学学术图书选题策划进行了预测研究,基于中外比较结果针对缩小中外生物医学学术图书出版差距、提升我国生物医学学术图书出版国际竞争力提出了对策和建议。本论文共分四个部分: 第一部分是生物医学学术图书出版规律探讨。首先,在对生物医学发展历程做了大量文献调研的基础上,选取3个重大事件作为研究对象:“重组DNA”或“分子克隆”技术发明与应用、“聚合酶链式反应”技术发明与应用、“基因组”研究与应用。其次,采用案例研究方法,分别通过对围绕以上3个重大事件的论文发表数量与相关英文学术图书出版品种关系的文献计量学分析、图书出版时间及出版形式分析、图书主题分化分析、图书出版机构分析,得到以下生物医学学术图书出版规律:学术图书出版品种的高峰一般在论文发表数量高峰后的2~5年出现;首部学术图书通常出现在知识源出现后的1~4年,出版形式以论文集为主;经典专著出版的时间一般是在知识源出现后10年左右;实验技术类图书出版具有周期性,目前周期为3年左右;技术手册是生物医学图书出版的永恒主题,随着研究进展出版主题越来细化;在生物医学学术图书出版领域,商业性出版社仍占有重要地位,学术出版社也可以依托母体优势形成出版特色。第二部分是中外生物医学学术图书出版比较研究。采用比较研究方法,对中外以“重组DNA”或“分子克隆”、“聚合酶链式反应”、“基因组”为主题的学术图书出版品种、首部学术图书出版时间、图书出版方式、图书出版机构进行了比较研究,得出以下结论:中外生物医学学术图书出版在品种上存在巨大差距;中国首部同样主题的生物医学学术图书比国外首部图书出版时间要晚;国外出版的生物医学学术图书以原创性著作为主,中国出版的生物医学学术图书中影印、翻译或编译等出版方式占了较大比重,原创性著作较少;在生物医学学术图书出版领域,国外学术出版社和商业出版社各有特色,中国出版企业战略不明确,选题策划能力较低。为了探求以上差距的深层次原因,根据迈克尔·波特提出的产业国际竞争力“钻石模型”,从出版资源要素、出版产业政策要素、出版企业经营战略和组织要素、出版技术要素四个方面对中外生物医学学术图书出版国际竞争力进行了比较研究,并得出结论:与发达国家相比,我国生物医学学术图书出版国际竞争力较低。第三部分是对策研究。首先,基于第一部分研究发现的出版规律,通过对2006 2010年美国《科学》杂志年度“十大”科学突破和《时代》杂志年度“十大”医学突破中有关生物医学内容的分析,预测了当前及今后一段时期内生物医学学术图书的重点选题领域:①基因测序与基因治疗;②蛋白质组研究;③干细胞研究;④细胞重新编程技术;⑤合成生物学。其次,基于第二部分发现的中外生物医学学术图书出版差距,为缩小中外差距,提出了发展我国生物医学学术图书出版的对策:加大出版力度,增加出版品种;抢占优势资源,提高原创水平;发展版权贸易,引进优秀图书;依托自身优势,形成出版特色。最后,基于中外生物医学学术图书国际竞争力的差距,提出了提升我国生物医学学术图书出版国际竞争力的策略:国家要加大生物医学科研投入;对生物医学学术图书出版给予优惠的税收和财政补贴政策;鼓励组建以专业化为特色的出版集团;出版企业要制定国际化战略;大力发展数字出版技术。第四部分是主要研究结论与讨论。简要概括了本论文的主要研究结论,并提出了研究中存在的不足和以后需要进一步研究的问题。
[Abstract]:At present, the publishing industry of our country is unprecedentedly prosperous, the variety and quantity of book publishing are increasing year by year, the copyright trade is active. From the aspects of the variety and quantity of books and publications every year, our country has entered the ranks of the world's publishing country. Academic books publishing is an important component of the publishing industry, and the publication of biomedical academic books is the most active academic publication. However, in the biomedical academic books published in China, the publishing forms, such as photocopying, translation and compilation, have accounted for a large proportion. There are few original academic books, especially the lack of classical academic books. English biomedical books published by developed countries such as Europe and America occupy the world biomedical academic books published. The mainstream represents the trend and direction of the current international biomedical academic books publishing. This study seeks to explore the publishing laws of biomedical academic books through the analysis of English biomedical academic books published in developed countries in Europe and the United States, and to find the difference between China and the developed countries through comparative research on the publication of biomedical academic books in China and foreign countries. It is of great significance to further explore the countermeasures to narrow the gap in order to improve the publication level of biomedical academic books in China.
First of all, this research adopts the methods of measurement, case study, and expert consultation. In view of the relationship between the biomedicine development and the academic book publishing, this paper studies the law of the publishing of biomedical academic books. Secondly, through the comparative study of the biologic medical books published around the same topic in China and foreign countries, the Chinese and foreign students are found to be found. In the end, based on the law of publication above, this paper makes a prediction and Research on the topic planning of biomedical academic books. Based on the comparison between China and foreign countries, some countermeasures are put forward to reduce the gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books and promote the international competitiveness of biomedical academic books in China. Suggestion.
This paper is divided into four parts:
First, on the basis of a large number of literature research on the history of biomedicine, 3 major events are selected as the research object: "recombinant DNA" or "molecular cloning" technology invention and application, "polymerase chain reaction" technology invention and application, "genome" research. Secondly, using the case study method, the bibliometric analysis of the relationship between the number of papers published around the 3 major events and the related English academic books, the analysis of book publishing time and the form of publication, the analysis of book theme differentiation, the analysis of book publishing institutions, and the following biomedical academics The law of book publishing: the peak of the variety of academic books is generally appeared in 2~5 years after the peak of the publication of the paper. The first academic books usually appear in the 1~4 years after the emergence of the source of knowledge, and the form of the publication is mainly on the anthology; the time of the publication of the classic monograph is generally about 10 years after the source of knowledge; the book of experimental technology books is published. Periodicity, the current cycle is about 3 years, the technical manual is the eternal theme of biomedical books publishing. With the progress of research, the publishing theme is becoming more and more detailed. In the field of biomedical academic books, commercial publishing houses still occupy an important position, and academic press can also form the publishing characteristics according to the advantages of the parent body.
The second part is the comparative study of biomedical academic books and publications in China and foreign countries. By means of comparative study, the publication of "recombinant DNA" or "molecular cloning", "polymerase chain reaction", "genome" as the subject of academic books, the time of publication of the first academic books, the way of book publishing, and the publishing institution of books have been carried out. The following conclusions are drawn: there is a huge gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books published in Chinese and foreign academic books; the first biomedical academic books with the same theme in China are later than the first books published in foreign countries; the biomedical academic books published abroad are the principal and the Chinese published biomedical academic books are photocopied. In the field of biomedical academic books publishing, foreign academic publishing houses and commercial publishing houses have their own characteristics. The strategy of Chinese publishing enterprises is not clear, and the planning ability of the selected topics is low. In order to explore the deep reasons of the above gap, according to Michael Porter The "Diamond Model" of industrial international competitiveness is a comparative study of the international competitiveness of Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books publishing from four aspects of publishing resource elements, publishing industry policy elements, publishing enterprise management strategy and organizational elements, and publishing technical elements, and draws a conclusion: compared with developed countries, China's biomedical academic map is compared. Book publishing has a low international competitiveness.
The third part is the countermeasure research. First, based on the publication rule of the first part of the study, the biomedical academic books in the previous and future period are predicted through the analysis of the 20062010 year "ten big" scientific breakthroughs of the American Journal of science and the "ten big" medical breakthroughs of the times magazine. The key topics are: (1) gene sequencing and gene therapy; (2) protein group research; (3) stem cell research; (4) cell reprogramming technology; (5) synthesis biology. Secondly, the gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books published on the basis of the second part is found to reduce the gap between China and foreign countries, and puts forward the development of biomedical academic books in China. Policy: increase the intensity of publishing, increase the variety of publishing, seize the dominant resources, improve the original level, develop the copyright trade, introduce excellent books, and rely on their own advantages to form the publishing characteristics. Finally, based on the gap of international competitiveness of Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books, the strategy of promoting the international competitiveness of biomedical academic books in China is put forward. The state should increase the input of biomedical scientific research; give preferential tax and financial subsidy policies to the publishing of biomedical academic books; encourage the formation of a publishing group characterized by specialization; the publishing enterprise should formulate an international strategy and vigorously develop the digital publishing technology.
The fourth part is the main research conclusion and discussion. It briefly summarizes the main conclusions of this paper, and puts forward the shortcomings in the study and the problems that need further study in the future.
【学位授予单位】：中国人民解放军军事医学科学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：R-5;G232

【参考文献】