话语基调下的学术期刊编辑两面性研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 03:22

本文选题：话语基调 + 学术编辑　；参考：《中国编辑》2017年11期

【摘要】：文章从系统功能语言学话语基调视角对学术期刊编辑的性质进行了讨论。研究发现,学术期刊编辑具有两面性特征,既有学术性的一面,又有技术性的一面。文章进而通过内容和形式的辩证关系分析了学术编辑的学术性和技术性之间的关系,要想正确认识学术编辑的性质,就不能只看其形式,忽略其内容,将二者结合起来才全面、客观和科学。那种认为编辑只是整理加工稿件,是中介、守门人、文字裁缝等观点,以及在对学术编辑进行考评时只看其编辑方面成果等做法,都是形式主义的观点和做法。文章最后讨论了使学术编辑隐性的学术性显性化的途径和方法,希冀为学术编辑主体地位的确立提供有力理论支撑,为编辑学的深入发展打下坚实基础。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the nature of academic journal editors from the perspective of the discourse tone of systemic functional linguistics. It is found that the editors of academic journals have dual characteristics, both academic and technical. The article further analyzes the relationship between academic and technical nature of academic editors through the dialectical relationship between contents and forms. If we want to correctly understand the nature of academic editors, we should not only look at their forms and ignore their contents, but also combine the two together in an all-round way. Objectivity and science The idea that editors are just finishing manuscripts, are mediators, gatekeepers, text tailors, and so on, and that they only look at their editorial achievements when evaluating academic editors, are all formalistic views and practices. Finally, the paper discusses the ways and methods to make academic editing recessive, hoping to provide a strong theoretical support for the establishment of academic editorial subject status and lay a solid foundation for the further development of editorial science.
【作者单位】：北京科技大学期刊中心;
【基金】：北京市社会科学基金项目“语域理论视阈下的儒家典籍核心概念词英译研究”(16YYB014)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：G230

【相似文献】