关于“一稿多投”行为的案例分析

发布时间：2018-06-24 18:19

本文选题：一稿多投 + 审稿　；参考：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《中华人民共和国著作权法》(以下简称《著作权法》和《中华人民共和国著作权法实施条例》自颁布修订实施以来,至今已有近十年的时间了。它为保障智力成果和鼓励智力创作起到了积极作用。然而,近些年来学术界日益泛滥的“一稿多投”现象却屡禁不止,并且在出版社、作者和读者三方群体中产生了强烈争议,不由使我们对《著作权法》关于一稿多投问题的规定产生了一些思考。“一稿多投”不仅关系到出版社的利益,同时也关系到作者合法利益的保护和最大化。在知识经济和信息爆炸的时代,对此问题予以深入研究,对于完善现有立法和规范学术行为具有重要意义。本文以《著作权法》和《合同法》为视角,选取典型案例,通过对案例的分析提出“一稿多投”现象背后所隐含的法律问题,从而对这一现象的成因、法律性质、立法漏洞进行全面剖析,最终为这一问题提出解决对策。笔者认为要解决“一稿多投”问题,首先必须要对这一行为进行界定和分类,对固有的“一稿多投都是违法”这一观点进行澄清,才.能客观合理地解决该问题。在传统的《著作权法》角度分析“一稿多投”的基础之上,通过运用《合同法》原理,对“稿约”、“投稿行为”、“刊用作品”等行为进行法律性质界定,将作者和出版社双方的权利和义务明确化,有利于合理归责,从而使问题的解决合法合理。同时,《著作权法》第32条和《著作权法实施条例》第23条存在的立法漏洞造成了著作权的空洞化,更加强化了作者的弱势地位。因此,对于该问题的解决必须从法律、出版社和学术道德建设三个方面着手,将事前预防和事后惩罚相结合。应当完善现有法律,采用合同方式避免“一稿多投”,使作者和出版社双方的权利义务得到法定平衡；出版社在提高工作效率、加强与作者沟通的同时应当与作者签订书面合同。在此,出版社尤其应当参考借鉴国外优秀期刊的审稿制度,从而简化审稿程序和确保审稿的公正性。改革我国现有的学术评价体系,成立学术监督机构,通过加快学术诚信建设可以为这一问题的解决提供内在动力。
[Abstract]:The copyright Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the copyright Law) and the regulations for the implementation of the copyright Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the copyright Law") have been in force for nearly ten years since they were promulgated and revised. It plays a positive role in safeguarding intellectual achievements and encouraging intellectual creation. However, in recent years, the phenomenon of "more than one draft", which has become increasingly widespread in academic circles, has been repeatedly prohibited, and has generated strong controversy among the three groups of publishers, authors and readers. It makes us think about the regulation of "copyright Law". "one draft and more input" concerns not only the interests of the publishing house, but also the protection and maximization of the author's legitimate interests. In the era of knowledge economy and information explosion, it is of great significance to make a thorough study of this problem for perfecting the existing legislation and standardizing academic behavior. This paper, from the perspective of copyright Law and contract Law, selects typical cases and puts forward the legal problems behind the phenomenon of "one draft with more input" through the analysis of the case, so as to analyze the causes and the legal nature of this phenomenon. The legislative loophole carries on the comprehensive analysis, finally proposes the solution countermeasure for this question. The author thinks that in order to solve the problem of "one draft and more input", we must define and classify this behavior first, and clarify the inherent view that "one draft and more input is illegal". The problem can be solved objectively and reasonably. Based on the analysis of "one draft with more input" in the traditional copyright Law, this paper defines the legal nature of "manuscript agreement", "contribution act", "publication work" and so on by applying the principle of "contract Law". Making clear the rights and obligations of the author and the publishing house is beneficial to the reasonable imputation, so that the solution of the problem is legal and reasonable. At the same time, the legislative loopholes in Article 32 of the copyright Law and Article 23 of the implementation regulations of the copyright Law have resulted in the hollowing out of the copyright and strengthened the weak position of the author. Therefore, to solve this problem, we must start from the three aspects of law, publishing house and academic moral construction, and combine prevention and punishment after the event. The existing laws should be perfected and the contract method should be adopted to avoid "one draft with more input", so that the rights and obligations of both authors and publishers can be legally balanced, and publishers are improving their working efficiency. Strengthen communication with the author should be accompanied by a written contract with the author. In this paper, the publishing house should refer to the system of reviewing manuscripts of foreign excellent periodicals, so as to simplify the procedure of reviewing manuscripts and ensure the fairness of reviewing manuscripts. The reform of the existing academic evaluation system and the establishment of academic supervision institutions can provide an internal motive force for the solution of this problem by speeding up the construction of academic integrity.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】