孤儿作品著作权问题研究
发布时间：2018-07-24 10:35
【摘要】：孤儿作品是指因难以找到权利人,利用人无法取得授权的作品。立法界和理论界对孤儿作品范围的争议主要集中在孤儿作品是否包括作者身份不明的作品和未发表的作品上,通过对孤儿作品定义的分析认为孤儿作品的范围包括作者身份不明的作品和部分未发表的作品。现存孤儿作品范围的确定方式主要包括合理勤勉查找的方式和强制许可使用的方式,前者以成本较低、对完善的著作权管理制度的依赖性不强的特点优于后者,但存在所确定范围不够明确的缺点,通过细化确定方式的步骤可以克服这一问题。 现存的孤儿作品使用模式主要包括限制救济模式与强制许可模式,两种模式各有所长,通过把已发表孤儿作品的使用人分为非营利使用人和营利使用人可将两种模式结合,即非营利使用人对应限制救济的使用模式,营利使用人对应强制许可的使用模式,此外拟通过时效取得方案解决未发表孤儿作品的使用问题。 限制救济的使用模式与强制许可的使用模式分别对应事后补偿的保护模式和事先提存的保护模式。事后补偿模式以其简便易行的特点更加适合非营利使用人,事先提存模式以其易获补偿的特点更加适合营利使用人。 著作权集体管理组织以其市场灵敏度强、效率高、成本低等特点使其相对于行政机构更加适合管理孤儿作品。孤儿作品的价值评估与备案都是孤儿作品管理活动中需要注意的方面。 我国著作权法在孤儿作品问题上存在漏洞与缺失,著作权法草案有关孤儿作品的规定尚有较多疏漏。针对这些不足,本文提出确立孤儿作品的确定方式、设立使用人义务、设定保护模式以及选择适当管理方式的完善建议。
[Abstract]:Orphan works refer to works that cannot be authorized because of difficulty in finding the right holder. The controversy over the scope of orphan works in the legislative and theoretical circles is mainly focused on whether the orphan works include works of unknown authors and unpublished works. Through the analysis of the definition of orphan works, it is concluded that the scope of orphan works includes unidentified works and some unpublished works. The methods of determining the scope of the existing orphan works mainly include the way of reasonable and diligent search and the way of compulsory license. The former is superior to the latter because of its lower cost and less dependence on the perfect copyright management system. However, there is the shortcoming that the defined range is not clear enough, and this problem can be overcome by the step of detailed determination. The existing modes of use of orphan works mainly include the limited relief mode and the compulsory licensing mode. The two models have their own strengths. By dividing the users of published orphan works into non-profit users and profit-making users, the two models can be combined. In other words, the non-profit user corresponds to the use mode of limiting relief, the profit user corresponds to the use mode of compulsory license, in addition, the problem of using unpublished orphan works is solved through the prescription obtaining scheme. The use mode of restricted relief and the use mode of compulsory license correspond to the protection mode of ex post compensation and the protection mode of advance deposit respectively. The ex post compensation model is more suitable for the non-profit user because of its simple and convenient characteristics, and the advance deposit mode is more suitable for the profit user because of its easily compensated feature. Because of its strong market sensitivity, high efficiency and low cost, the copyright collective management organization is more suitable for the management of orphan works than the administrative organization. The value evaluation and filing of orphan works are important aspects in the management of orphan works. There are loopholes and defects in the problem of orphans' works in China's copyright law, and there are still many omissions in the provisions of the draft copyright Law on orphans' works. In view of these shortcomings, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to establish the way of determining the orphan's works, how to set up the duty of the user, how to set up the mode of protection and how to choose the proper management mode.
【学位授予单位】：南京理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2141102
[Abstract]:Orphan works refer to works that cannot be authorized because of difficulty in finding the right holder. The controversy over the scope of orphan works in the legislative and theoretical circles is mainly focused on whether the orphan works include works of unknown authors and unpublished works. Through the analysis of the definition of orphan works, it is concluded that the scope of orphan works includes unidentified works and some unpublished works. The methods of determining the scope of the existing orphan works mainly include the way of reasonable and diligent search and the way of compulsory license. The former is superior to the latter because of its lower cost and less dependence on the perfect copyright management system. However, there is the shortcoming that the defined range is not clear enough, and this problem can be overcome by the step of detailed determination. The existing modes of use of orphan works mainly include the limited relief mode and the compulsory licensing mode. The two models have their own strengths. By dividing the users of published orphan works into non-profit users and profit-making users, the two models can be combined. In other words, the non-profit user corresponds to the use mode of limiting relief, the profit user corresponds to the use mode of compulsory license, in addition, the problem of using unpublished orphan works is solved through the prescription obtaining scheme. The use mode of restricted relief and the use mode of compulsory license correspond to the protection mode of ex post compensation and the protection mode of advance deposit respectively. The ex post compensation model is more suitable for the non-profit user because of its simple and convenient characteristics, and the advance deposit mode is more suitable for the profit user because of its easily compensated feature. Because of its strong market sensitivity, high efficiency and low cost, the copyright collective management organization is more suitable for the management of orphan works than the administrative organization. The value evaluation and filing of orphan works are important aspects in the management of orphan works. There are loopholes and defects in the problem of orphans' works in China's copyright law, and there are still many omissions in the provisions of the draft copyright Law on orphans' works. In view of these shortcomings, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to establish the way of determining the orphan's works, how to set up the duty of the user, how to set up the mode of protection and how to choose the proper management mode.
【学位授予单位】：南京理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑纳新;我国著作权集体管理组织建设若干问题的思考[J];编辑之友;2005年03期
2 阎冰清;;论“孤儿作品”的利用[J];编辑之友;2012年04期
3 周艳敏;;无主著作财产权:国有还是公有?——从《我的前半生》的权属争议到我国《著作权法》的修改[J];出版发行研究;2008年04期
4 刘友华;;利益平衡论:穿行于理想与现实之间——《知识产权法利益平衡理论》读后[J];电子知识产权;2006年11期
5 黄旭春;;浅析美国2008年孤儿作品议案[J];电子知识产权;2009年07期
6 金泳锋;彭婧;;孤儿作品保护大陆与香港之比较研究[J];电子知识产权;2011年03期
7 周艳敏;宋慧献;;关于孤儿作品著作权问题的立法设想[J];电子知识产权;2011年03期
8 吴汉东;;知识产权法的平衡精神与平衡理论——冯晓青教授《知识产权法利益平衡理论》评析[J];法商研究;2007年05期
9 万丽慧;;以交易成本理论分析数字著作权交易的困境与机会[J];出版发行研究;2012年06期
10 赵力;;孤儿作品法理问题研究——中国视野下的西方经验[J];河北法学;2012年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 董皓;多元视角下的著作权法公共领域问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年
，本文编号：2141102
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2141102.html
