知识领域的公共悖论与学术评价的伦理可能

发布时间：2018-10-19 14:06

【摘要】：知识领域是社会总分工、总运行体系中的一个领域和环节。知识的不断地去神圣性、日常化,以及公共性的不断增加,是知识与学术发展的历史趋势。但在现实中,学术领域往往表现出具体的准私人性。学术领域、学术评价、学术活动具有深刻的政治性、行政性、社会性、情感性。增加学术评价的标准和过程的公开度,推进评价委员会及其人员的定期流动,对推进学术评价的伦理化,实现学术评价的公平、公正,具有基础意义。我国的学术期刊承担了重要的学术评价功能,提升学术期刊的质量与水平,对推进学术评价的伦理化具有重要作用。日益复杂的办刊语境,对学术期刊发展是挑战,也为未来的期刊领袖提供了难得的创新与发展机遇。
[Abstract]:The domain of knowledge is a field and link in the general division of labor and operation system of society. The historical trend of knowledge and academic development is the unceasing desecration of knowledge, the daily nature, and the increasing of publicity. However, in reality, the academic field often shows a specific quasi-private nature. Academic field, academic evaluation, academic activities have profound political, administrative, social, emotional. It is of fundamental significance to increase the openness of the standards and processes of academic evaluation and to promote the regular flow of evaluation committee and its personnel to promote the ethics of academic evaluation and to realize the fairness and fairness of academic evaluation. The academic journals in our country play an important role in academic evaluation, and improve the quality and level of academic journals, which plays an important role in promoting the ethics of academic evaluation. The increasingly complex context of running journals is a challenge to the development of academic journals and provides a rare opportunity for future periodical leaders to innovate and develop.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院哲学所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“社会主义核心价值观的传统文化根基研究”(14AZD005);国家社会科学基金重点项目“城市哲学与城市批评史研究”(11AZD058)
【分类号】：G239.2

【相似文献】