《中华医学杂志英文版》与三大医学期刊近三年刊文的对比分析

发布时间：2018-12-23 09:04

【摘要】：【目的】研究《中华医学杂志英文版》(CMJ)和《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEJM)、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)以及《柳叶刀》(The Lancet)杂志刊文的差异,探索我国医学期刊的发展途径。【方法】基于科睿唯安数据库,比较2014—2016年CMJ与三大医学期刊载文情况,分析期刊载文被引频次排名前10的作者来源分布情况。【结果】CMJ的即年指标与被引半衰期都与三大医学期刊存在着巨大的差距;同时,CMJ本国作者载文的比例明显偏高,整体引用率较低,载文国外作者大部分源于亚洲国家与其他发展中国家。【结论】CMJ国内论文总量很大,但影响力不高。需要积极与国外出版商合作,加大吸引国际稿源的力度,在提高期刊国外稿件刊登比例的基础上,进一步提高国外稿件的质量,真正实现期刊关注程度的国际化,使CMJ真正成为引领国内英文期刊迈向国际化品牌的排头兵。
[Abstract]:[objective] to study the differences of the articles published in the English edition of the Chinese Medical Journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, the (JAMA) of the American Medical Association and the Lancet (The Lancet). To explore the way of development of medical journals in China. [methods] based on Ke Rui Wei'an database, this paper compares the papers published by CMJ and three major medical journals in 2014-2016. [results] there is a huge gap between the annual index and the cited half-life of CMJ and the three medical journals. At the same time, the proportion of papers published by domestic authors of CMJ is on the high side, and the overall citation rate is relatively low. Most of the authors published abroad originate from Asian countries and other developing countries. [conclusion] the amount of domestic papers published by CMJ is very large, but the influence is not high. It is necessary to actively cooperate with foreign publishers to attract more international manuscripts, to further improve the quality of foreign manuscripts on the basis of increasing the proportion of foreign manuscripts published in periodicals, and to truly internationalize the degree of concern of periodicals. Make CMJ really lead the domestic English periodicals to the international brand of the vanguard.
【作者单位】：中华医学会《中华医学杂志英文版》编辑部;
【基金】：中国科技期刊登峰行动计划中国科技期刊国际影响力提升计划(PIIJ2-B-38)
【分类号】：G237.5;G353.1

【相似文献】