汇编作品版权保护的法理基础探究
发布时间：2019-02-12 19:18
【摘要】：汇编作品在各国的著作权法上都是作为一种独立的作品类型进行保护的。各种形式的作品或者不构成作品的数据材料都有可能成为汇编作品，只要在对这些内容的选择和编排上体现了独创性。然而各国对“独创性”标准的要求并不一致。“独创性”标准本身也经历了从最初的“额头流汗原则”到“最低限度的智力创造”的变化。除了可以受版权保护的汇编作品外，还有一些在选择和编排方面不具有独创性的汇编物（非独创性数据库）不能受版权法保护，但是在实践中它们也有很强的利用价值，如何对这类汇编物提供法律保护也是我们所要讨论的问题。本文主要围绕着汇编作品“独创性”的标准变化以及其与数据库保护的关系展开讨论，除引言和结语外主要分为四章： 第一章：额头流汗原则的扬弃对汇编作品版权保护的影响。本章主要以美国Feist案为线索，分析额头流汗原则对汇编作品的保护状态，，来进一步分析额头流汗原则的弊端。 第二章：独创性原则下汇编作品的版权保护。本章笔者主要分析汇编作品独创性的特殊所在（即不问内容，只看对内容的选择和编排），并通过案例来展开讨论在独创性原则下汇编作品版权保护的范围的局限性及解决办法。 第三章：非独创性数据库的法律保护。在舍弃额头流汗原则后原来被视为汇编作品的非独创性数据库出现了保护空白，可见光对数据库提供版权保护是有局限性的，必须另寻他途来解决。本章主要讨论对这些非独创性数据库的保护（欧盟的数据库权思路、美国的反不正当竞争思路、德国将其纳入邻接权保护）以及我国该何去何从。 第四章：汇编作品版权保护中的利益平衡考量。汇编作品，特别是事实性汇编作品提供版权保护是否会造成版权人对事实的垄断而侵犯公众的利益，这是汇编作品版权保护无法回避的利益平衡之虑。
[Abstract]:Compilation works are protected as an independent type of works in the copyright laws of various countries. Any form of work or data material that does not form a work can become a compilation, provided that the selection and arrangement of the content is original. However, countries' requirements for "originality" standards are not consistent. The "originality" standard itself has undergone a change from the original "forehead sweating principle" to the "minimum intellectual creation". In addition to copyrighted compilations, there are other non-original compilations (non-original databases) that are not protected by copyright law in terms of selection and layout, but they are also highly useful in practice. How to provide legal protection to this kind of compendium is also the question that we will discuss. This paper focuses on the standard changes of "originality" of the compilation work and its relationship with database protection. Besides introduction and conclusion, it is divided into four chapters: chapter one: the influence of sweating principle of forehead on copyright protection of compilation works. This chapter mainly takes the American Feist case as the clue, analyzes the frontal sweat principle to the compilation work protection state, further analyzes the frontal sweat principle malpractice. Chapter two: copyright protection of compilation works under the principle of originality. In this chapter, the author mainly analyzes the originality of the compilation works (that is, regardless of the content, only the selection and arrangement of the content), The limitations and solutions of copyright protection in compiling works under the principle of originality are discussed through cases. Chapter three: legal protection of non-original database. After abandoning the principle of sweat on the forehead, the non-original database, which was originally regarded as a compilation of works, has a protection gap. The visible light has limitations in providing copyright protection to the database, and must find another way to solve it. This chapter mainly discusses the protection of these non-original databases (the idea of database rights in the European Union, the idea of anti-unfair competition in the United States, and the protection of neighboring rights in Germany) and the future of our country. Chapter four: the balance of interests in copyright protection of compilation works. Whether the copyright protection provided by the compilation works, especially the factual compilation works, will cause the copyright owners to monopolize the facts and infringe upon the public interests is an unavoidable balance of interests for the copyright protection of the compilation works.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2420710
[Abstract]:Compilation works are protected as an independent type of works in the copyright laws of various countries. Any form of work or data material that does not form a work can become a compilation, provided that the selection and arrangement of the content is original. However, countries' requirements for "originality" standards are not consistent. The "originality" standard itself has undergone a change from the original "forehead sweating principle" to the "minimum intellectual creation". In addition to copyrighted compilations, there are other non-original compilations (non-original databases) that are not protected by copyright law in terms of selection and layout, but they are also highly useful in practice. How to provide legal protection to this kind of compendium is also the question that we will discuss. This paper focuses on the standard changes of "originality" of the compilation work and its relationship with database protection. Besides introduction and conclusion, it is divided into four chapters: chapter one: the influence of sweating principle of forehead on copyright protection of compilation works. This chapter mainly takes the American Feist case as the clue, analyzes the frontal sweat principle to the compilation work protection state, further analyzes the frontal sweat principle malpractice. Chapter two: copyright protection of compilation works under the principle of originality. In this chapter, the author mainly analyzes the originality of the compilation works (that is, regardless of the content, only the selection and arrangement of the content), The limitations and solutions of copyright protection in compiling works under the principle of originality are discussed through cases. Chapter three: legal protection of non-original database. After abandoning the principle of sweat on the forehead, the non-original database, which was originally regarded as a compilation of works, has a protection gap. The visible light has limitations in providing copyright protection to the database, and must find another way to solve it. This chapter mainly discusses the protection of these non-original databases (the idea of database rights in the European Union, the idea of anti-unfair competition in the United States, and the protection of neighboring rights in Germany) and the future of our country. Chapter four: the balance of interests in copyright protection of compilation works. Whether the copyright protection provided by the compilation works, especially the factual compilation works, will cause the copyright owners to monopolize the facts and infringe upon the public interests is an unavoidable balance of interests for the copyright protection of the compilation works.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周智军;;从美国对数据库保护的进程看我国对数据库的保护[J];法制与社会;2009年06期
2 戴建志,夏辉;汇编作品的创作特征[J];法律适用;2000年03期
3 王建芳;;论大众点评网站的著作权保护——大众点评网诉爱帮网侵犯著作权案评析[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2010年08期
4 陈惠珍;;汇编作品著作权和版式权的界定及权利范围——《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》系列著作权案评析[J];科技与法律;2009年04期
5 陶舒亚;;汇编作品著作权相关问题探析[J];中国政法大学学报;2010年05期
6 王迁;;论我国《著作权法》中“汇编权”的重构[J];法学论坛;2008年06期
7 顾微微;徐慎莉;;从美国Feist案看汇编作品的法律保护[J];新疆社科论坛;2006年04期
8 卢海君;;辛勤收集原则在汇编作品版权保护中的地位和影响[J];中国出版;2011年03期
9 杨巧;汇编作品,抑或民间文学艺术作品?——“仿古迎宾入城式”著作权纠纷一案的评析[J];知识产权;2005年05期
10 黄振中;;使用汇编作品的内容是否构成对汇编作品著作权的侵犯——对一起侵犯汇编作品著作权案的思考[J];知识产权;2010年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陈军;著作权保护中的利益平衡[D];西南政法大学;2002年
2 赵成艳;汇编作品的著作权保护[D];中国政法大学;2007年
本文编号：2420710
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2420710.html
