避风港规则下网络服务商版权间接侵权研究
发布时间：2019-02-14 21:29
【摘要】：“避风港规则”是最早确立于美国版权法中,并为世界各国著作权立法普遍采用的,适用于互联网领域,用以解决网络服务提供者版权侵权问题的一项规则。我国也在《网络司法解释》、《信息网络传播权保护条例》以及最近颁布的《侵权责任法》中规定了有关网络服务提供者的免责性条款,这些条款构成了我国网络服务商的“避风港”。在网络环境中,任何网络用户的直接侵权都不可能离开网络服务商的硬件设施和软件系统,所以如何适用“避风港规则”来免除网络服务商的间接侵权责任尤为重要。 本文主要就是研究在避风港规则之下网络服务商的版权侵权责任。让符合法律规定免责的网络服务商进入“避风港”,让不符合免责条款的网络服务商承担侵权责任,才能保证整个互联网行业健康、持久的发展。 第一章首先介绍了“避风港规则”产生的背景以及其具体内容,说明网络服务提供者在符合“通知与移除”规则的条件下可以免责。接着引出“红旗标准”,讨论在何种情况下网络服务提供者存在主观过错,需要承担侵权责任。 第二章本文按照法律出台的先后顺序来介绍我国法律对“避风港规则”的规定,分别针对各个法律条文中关于“避风港规则”的条款予以解释,指出法律规定越来越合理,更加有利于解决网络服务提供者与权利人之间的纠纷。 第三章本文进入“避风港规则”的司法实践研究,对网络服务商提供的服务进行分类,选择出现纠纷较多的信息存储空间服务、搜索或者链接服务等领域,通过典型案例分析如何适用“避风港规则”来认定信息存储空间服务、提供搜索或者链接服务等网络服务提供者的版权间接侵权责任。 第四章首先简单介绍了网络服务商版权侵权责任的归责原则,指明过错责任是网络服务提供者版权侵权责任的归责原则,最后分析了如何在“避风港规则”下认定网络服务提供者的主观过错,从而让其承担侵权责任。 最后,本文指出“避风港规则”为网络服务提供者提供了庇护,但同时也要求网络服务提供者必须尽到合理注意义务,目的是为了权利人与网络服务提供者之间的利益平衡。
[Abstract]:The "safe haven rule" is a rule established in the copyright law of the United States and widely used in copyright legislation of various countries in the world. It is applicable to the Internet field and is used to solve the copyright infringement problem of network service providers. China has also stipulated the exemption clauses of network service providers in the Internet Judicial interpretation, the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication and the recently promulgated Tort liability Law. These clauses constitute the "safe haven" of our country's network service providers. In the network environment, the direct infringement of any network user can not leave the hardware and software system of the network service provider, so how to apply the "safe haven rule" to avoid the indirect tort liability of the network service provider is particularly important. This article mainly studies the copyright infringement liability of network service provider under the safe haven rule. Only by allowing the network service providers that accord with the legal exemption to enter the "safe haven", and allowing the network service providers that do not comply with the exemption clauses to bear the tort liability, can the whole Internet industry develop healthily and sustainably. The first chapter introduces the background and content of the "safe haven rules", and explains that network service providers can be exempted from liability under the conditions of "notification and removal". Then the red flag standard is introduced to discuss the subjective fault of network service providers and the need to assume tort liability. In the second chapter, according to the order in which the law is issued, the article introduces the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in our country's laws, and explains the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in each legal provision separately, and points out that the legal provisions are becoming more and more reasonable. More conducive to the settlement of disputes between network service providers and right holders. In Chapter three, this article enters the judicial practice research of the "safe haven rules", classifies the services provided by network service providers, and selects information storage space services, search or link services, which have more disputes, and so on. Through the typical case analysis how to apply the "safe haven rule" to identify the information storage space services, provide search or link services and other network service providers copyright infringement liability. Chapter four introduces the liability principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider, and points out that fault liability is the imputation principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider. Finally, it analyzes how to identify the subjective fault of the network service provider under the "safe haven rules" so that it can bear the tort liability. Finally, this paper points out that the "safe haven rules" provide shelter for network service providers, but at the same time, it also requires the network service providers to do their fair duty of care, in order to balance the interests between the right holders and the network service providers.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2422627
[Abstract]:The "safe haven rule" is a rule established in the copyright law of the United States and widely used in copyright legislation of various countries in the world. It is applicable to the Internet field and is used to solve the copyright infringement problem of network service providers. China has also stipulated the exemption clauses of network service providers in the Internet Judicial interpretation, the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication and the recently promulgated Tort liability Law. These clauses constitute the "safe haven" of our country's network service providers. In the network environment, the direct infringement of any network user can not leave the hardware and software system of the network service provider, so how to apply the "safe haven rule" to avoid the indirect tort liability of the network service provider is particularly important. This article mainly studies the copyright infringement liability of network service provider under the safe haven rule. Only by allowing the network service providers that accord with the legal exemption to enter the "safe haven", and allowing the network service providers that do not comply with the exemption clauses to bear the tort liability, can the whole Internet industry develop healthily and sustainably. The first chapter introduces the background and content of the "safe haven rules", and explains that network service providers can be exempted from liability under the conditions of "notification and removal". Then the red flag standard is introduced to discuss the subjective fault of network service providers and the need to assume tort liability. In the second chapter, according to the order in which the law is issued, the article introduces the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in our country's laws, and explains the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in each legal provision separately, and points out that the legal provisions are becoming more and more reasonable. More conducive to the settlement of disputes between network service providers and right holders. In Chapter three, this article enters the judicial practice research of the "safe haven rules", classifies the services provided by network service providers, and selects information storage space services, search or link services, which have more disputes, and so on. Through the typical case analysis how to apply the "safe haven rule" to identify the information storage space services, provide search or link services and other network service providers copyright infringement liability. Chapter four introduces the liability principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider, and points out that fault liability is the imputation principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider. Finally, it analyzes how to identify the subjective fault of the network service provider under the "safe haven rules" so that it can bear the tort liability. Finally, this paper points out that the "safe haven rules" provide shelter for network service providers, but at the same time, it also requires the network service providers to do their fair duty of care, in order to balance the interests between the right holders and the network service providers.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 赵云;网络版权间接侵权民事责任研究[D];烟台大学;2012年
2 陈玲;我国视频分享网站的“避风港”规则研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
3 吴淑朋;《侵权责任法》第36条评析[D];华中师范大学;2013年
4 温静静;数字音乐网站中的音乐版权问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
，本文编号：2422627
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2422627.html
